| Author |
Message |
|
PanAm
|
Posted: Nov 23, 2009 - 07:21 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: May 23, 2006 - 10:18 PM
Posts: 46
Status: Offline
|
What are the current super hornet T/W ratio in clean configuration and what is it when it's fully loaded?
Thanks
Brad |
_________________ PAnam
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 24, 2013 - 6:18 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
avon1944
|
Posted: Dec 03, 2009 - 08:51 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Nov 24, 2004 - 02:03 AM
Posts: 394
Status: Offline
|
| I must apologize that I don't have the specific information you seek but, (to my knowledge) the Hornet is one of the few fighters that does not have a forums! Information about the Hornet is less available to many of us civilians. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
darkvarkguy
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2009 - 02:20 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 05, 2009 - 06:01 AM
Posts: 366
Location: Raleigh, NC
Status: Offline
|
| I thought with the -414 engines it was close to, if not 1:1. |
_________________ FB-111A Pease AFB 82-87
A-10A Suwon AB ROK 87-88
FB-111A/F-111G Pease AFB 88-90
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2009 - 06:45 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1193
Location: Phoenix, Az
Status: Offline
|
| the actual performance of the 414 is less than the 22K specified, so more like 0.92 when clean. Its not a boom and zoom plane, but its squared loop as to be seen to be believed. |
_________________ James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
bjr1028
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2009 - 06:49 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 07, 2009 - 04:34 AM
Posts: 503
Location: Dubuque, IA
Status: Offline
|
| Aerodynamics are just as if not more important than thrust to weight ratio when it comes to how an aircraft performs. The F414 and its EPE variant have very similar numbers to the TF30 and F110 used in the Tomcat while both the engine and airframe are lighter. If it was just t/w the Super Hornet would have much better performance than it actually does. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|