Forum: F-16 versus XYZ

Su-27 vs F-16



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
skyhigh
PostPosted: Apr 17, 2009 - 03:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 27, 2009 - 11:01 AM
Posts: 467

Status: Offline
ROCAF F-16A pilots may have the skill to knock down PLAAF J-11Bs, but it's either easy or hard, depending on the skill of the ChiCom pilots (watch out for the elite PLAAF squadrons).
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 23, 2013 - 8:59 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
DarkDuke
PostPosted: Jul 14, 2009 - 02:39 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Aug 07, 2008 - 02:27 PM
Posts: 8

Status: Offline
Clearly concerning the maneuverability, Su-27 is really surpass F-16.



Comparison of turn rate characteristics for the F-15C and Su-27.jpg
 Description:
We got final conclusion now
 Filesize:  33.82 KB
 Viewed:  10654 Time(s)

Comparison of turn rate characteristics for the F-15C and Su-27.jpg


 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sprstdlyscottsmn
PostPosted: Jul 15, 2009 - 05:13 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1193
Location: Phoenix, Az
Status: Offline
okay so you are showing a 9-G chart for two non-9G (under combat conditions) aircraft and comparing the results to a true 9G aircraft. The F-15 was known for it maneuverability, yes, but it was its SUSTAINED turn performance that came from it extreamely high thrust and low wing loading. The F-16 is known for being the first 9-G fighter, with lessons learned from the F-15 that allow it to mainatain a 9-G turn and lose speed less rapidly than even an F-15, forget about the heavy Sukhoi. In a sub-400 knot sea level 2 heater only 3/4 tank of gas turnbing fight the Su might, MIGHT, get a great initial turn rate, but it will soon slow down and its turn will too. As for the chart, there is no source so its validity comes into question. I used to make charts like that years ago, and my older charts will tell you that the F-14B was the best dogfighter ever, which its not. Sukhois are very maneuverable for what they are, a long range interceptor. Nothing that weighs in at 30 tons with no weapons is a true dogfighter.

_________________
James,

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
F16guy
PostPosted: Jul 19, 2009 - 08:54 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Apr 22, 2004 - 03:08 PM
Posts: 366

Status: Offline
DarkDuke

Your graph says Su-27 vs F-15 not F-16. Next, having actually seen the graphs used to compare jets,...this one is not accurate for either aircraft mentioned in the title, no matter what you think...did this come from your copy of a Russian flight simulator product.

Lastly, your english translator is good but still it is not entirely correct.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
callsignthumper
PostPosted: Nov 07, 2009 - 06:20 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 03, 2009 - 01:21 AM
Posts: 78

Status: Offline
LMAO GO GET EM FELLAS Slap
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic