Forum: F-16 Armament & Stores

Laser guidance limitations



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
_Viper_
PostPosted: Jan 28, 2009 - 03:58 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 02, 2006 - 11:53 AM
Posts: 91

Status: Offline
I went on the internet and read that moving the laser spot when illuminating the target could greatly reduce the accuracy of the weapon.

However this seems a bit odd because I also know tha laser guidance is effective against moving targets like tanks or vechiles on the ground.

Could somebody explain this or is it just a spelling mistake?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 23, 2013 - 3:17 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
renatohm
PostPosted: Jan 28, 2009 - 05:06 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Dec 27, 2004 - 08:49 PM
Posts: 125

Status: Offline
It is a mitake and is not... Confused Moving the laser will reduce its accuracy, but that is the reason why most laser targeting pods, ie Sniper XR, LANTIRN and the like, have a stabilisation system. So yes, move the laser and you will miss, but targeting pods will track even moving targets.

_________________
Cool
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Jan 28, 2009 - 05:50 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496

I would submit that steadily tracking a moving target and waving the laser around like a laser pointer that a cat is chasing are two different things.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Loomis
PostPosted: Jan 28, 2009 - 08:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 31, 2005 - 08:10 PM
Posts: 76

Status: Offline
As Guysmiley notes, it depends on how the spot is moved. If the spot is moved rapidly from one point to another, the weapon would have to acquire the new target position, reset its guide filters (if the location difference was large enough) and begin guiding to the new spot. If it doesn't have sufficient energy to reach the new spot, it will miss. If the spot is moved rapidly back and forth between two or more points, the weapon is going to have to make a decision: choose one targeted position and go for it or choose a targeted position that splits the difference among all the spots it's seeing (the latter is called centroiding). Again, the accuracy is affected.

If there is a smooth movement of the spot, e.g., a moving vehicle is being targeted, the weapon can actually build a velocity vector and aim to where the target will be.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
_Viper_
PostPosted: Feb 04, 2009 - 11:12 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 02, 2006 - 11:53 AM
Posts: 91

Status: Offline
Loomis wrote:
As Guysmiley notes, it depends on how the spot is moved. If the spot is moved rapidly from one point to another, the weapon would have to acquire the new target position, reset its guide filters (if the location difference was large enough) and begin guiding to the new spot.

Yes this explanation makes sense to me. I was also wondering that is it possible that a pilot could steer two or more lgbs during a single pass? For example two bombs against one or two separate targets.

I do know that laser designators and seekers use a pulse coding system to ensure that a specific seeker and designator combination work in harmony. But does each LGB seeker unit has the same pulse code or does it depend on the bomb?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Loomis
PostPosted: Feb 04, 2009 - 05:43 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 31, 2005 - 08:10 PM
Posts: 76

Status: Offline
<i>...is it possible that a pilot could steer two or more lgbs during a single pass?</i>
Two bombs against one target is a no-brainer (in both senses of the word) because both bombs would guide to the same spot. However, the first bomb there would tend to either obliterate the target or to put up so much stuff in the air that the laser point would become unusable.

Two bombs, two targets might be theoretically possible, but I don't see it happening in practice. Shifting the laser spot from target to target means less time that the spot would be on the target and the bomb guidance would suffer accordingly. If the bombs were dropped together, there's no assurance that each bomb would select a separate target.

First rule of LGB Club: Don't talk about pulse code logic.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
_Viper_
PostPosted: Feb 04, 2009 - 07:54 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 02, 2006 - 11:53 AM
Posts: 91

Status: Offline
By the way has this F-15E Strike Eagle driver gone nuts when he's dropping 4 GBU-12s together? Twisted Evil

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... bu-12s.jpg

If I understood correctly each bomb or guidance unit has the same code so if the F-15E pilot uses the laset to paint the target every single (4) bomb is heading to the same target? Or am I still wrong?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
StolichnayaStrafer
PostPosted: Feb 04, 2009 - 08:47 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 20, 2008 - 04:50 PM
Posts: 854
Location: Dodge City, Moscowchusetts
Status: Offline
Maybe it is just a test for multiple LGB release/target drops or something. Isn't WA the tail code for test/training aircraft at Nellis and/or a base in Arizona at one time? They are dummy bombs as well, so that would be my guess.

I'm sure somebody else out there has a better/correct explanation than I do.

_________________
Why is the vodka gone?
Why is the vodka always gone... oh- that's why!
Hide the vodka!!!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
_Viper_
PostPosted: Feb 04, 2009 - 09:11 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 02, 2006 - 11:53 AM
Posts: 91

Status: Offline
StolichnayaStrafer wrote:
Maybe it is just a test for multiple LGB release/target drops or something. Isn't WA the tail code for test/training aircraft at Nellis and/or a base in Arizona at one time?
Yes it is. USAF Weapons School flies from Nellis AFB and other bases too various aircrafts, F-15s, F-16s, Ac-130s, B-52s etc.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Roscoe
PostPosted: Feb 05, 2009 - 03:08 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jun 29, 2004 - 09:14 PM
Posts: 1279
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
Weapons school teaches, they don't test. It's possible however thet they may loan jets on occasion since they all belong to the same wing.

_________________
Roscoe

<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic