Forum: Military Aircraft of the Cold War

A-10 engine upgrade



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
goatmilk
PostPosted: Aug 03, 2005 - 11:17 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Mar 03, 2005 - 12:43 AM
Posts: 190

Status: Offline
Any "engine-eers" or anyone up in here that can give some input on turbofan engines? I was interested on which or what type of engine is going to replace the current engines on the A-10 with the supposed future engine upgrade plan. Anyone know the limitations to turbofan engines as far as speed or thrust and how a more powerful engine will affect low-speed maneuverability? I can't remember the source, but I read somewhere that there was already a (possible) engine proposal. The engine is being used in another type of aircraft, but again, the name escapes me. I'd like to see the A-10 with more thrust/top speed. Would it be possible to let's say double its current top speed of 400mph with turbofan technology? What are your thoughts and opinions....
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 22, 2013 - 3:16 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Safetystick
PostPosted: Aug 03, 2005 - 01:05 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 13, 2005 - 12:46 PM
Posts: 156
Location: Sussex, UK
Status: Offline
I seem to recall the Turbofan off the Viking was a contendor.

S-3 Viking: TF34-GE-2 with 9275lbf thrust each.
A-10 Thunderbolt II:TF34-GE-100 with 9065lbf thrust each.

I guess installation would be fairly easy, both belonging to the same family but a 400lbf total thrust increase seems a tad underwhelming. Guess it all makes a difference in hot conditions though.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Aug 03, 2005 - 06:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496

The A-10 will never be supersonic with the wing it has, no matter how big its engines are.

On a side note, the F-16's engine is a turbofan as well, the difference being it is a low bypass engine versus the A-10's high bypass engines.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
FlightDreamz
PostPosted: Nov 28, 2008 - 08:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 18, 2007 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 646
Location: Long Island, New York
Status: Offline
I believe they are CIVILIAN versions of that GE engine with higher thrust (nothing against General Electric) and like SafetyStick mentioned the S-3 Viking had a higher thrust version of basically the same engine. If won't make the A-10 supersonic but it would improve it's ability to operate "hot and heavy".

_________________
A fighter without a gun . . . is like an airplane without a wing.— Brigadier General Robin Olds, USAF.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
TC
PostPosted: Nov 28, 2008 - 09:40 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 4006

Status: Offline
Remember also, that the S-3 is a bigger bird, and it needed a little more power in order to cope with the demands of carrier ops.

I don't really see anything wrong with the Warthog's engine. It doesn't really need to fly faster. It is well suited for the job it performs. Plus, a lot of the A-10's missions are now geared towards performing from a standoff position anyway.

_________________
"He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Nov 30, 2008 - 01:16 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2198
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
I agree with FlightDreamz...

From what I've heard, the "upgrade" simply brings the Warthog's TF34 engine back to "standard" with it's Civilian counterpart the CF34. Military engines don't always get the "upgrades" in parts/technologies that the civilian world receives. (Mostly due to funding) GE has essentially been producing parts for two "different" engine specifications.(TF34/CF34) By the USAF "upgrading" the TF34 to "standard" it won't have to pay "extra" for outdated parts that GE no longer wants to produce do to the limited quantities of the A-10 flavor. There are far more Regional jets using this motor than A-10s...

This "upgrade" is most likely being pushed by GE's pricing on original specification parts costing more than "newer specification" parts in mass production. Two Cents

Keep 'em flyin' Thumb
TEG
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
ATC
PostPosted: Nov 30, 2008 - 02:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Nov 17, 2005 - 01:06 AM
Posts: 245

Status: Offline
I could be wrong, but I believe Canadair Regional Jets use the same engines.

_________________
Lord bless Charlie Mops
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
cobzz
PostPosted: Nov 30, 2008 - 03:38 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 12:56 PM
Posts: 111

Status: Offline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_CF34

Looks like more powerful variants weigh a whole lot more. Maybe their could be a new variant developed? The only other engine in the 10k thrust class in my (2 minute) research is the Pratt & Whitney Canada PW810... 10k thrust class.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
StolichnayaStrafer
PostPosted: Nov 30, 2008 - 10:05 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 20, 2008 - 04:50 PM
Posts: 854
Location: Dodge City, Moscowchusetts
Status: Offline
I take it that the Powers that be probably shelved this proposal, especially since some squadrons were disbanded and their birds reshuffled and/or mothballed. Anyone know how many are still flying, and how long do you think they will keep them around?

I sure miss the 131st here. Crying or Very sad

_________________
Why is the vodka gone?
Why is the vodka always gone... oh- that's why!
Hide the vodka!!!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TC
PostPosted: Dec 01, 2008 - 03:08 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 4006

Status: Offline
Existing birds are being upgraded to C model standard. There is also a fleet-wide wing inspection in progress. The older, thin-wing birds are having their wings replaced. After that, the avionics upgrade will continue, so that all existing flyable jets will be converted to C's.

_________________
"He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
maddog2840
PostPosted: Dec 13, 2008 - 06:25 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Mar 26, 2004 - 01:40 PM
Posts: 778

Status: Offline
TC wrote:
Existing birds are being upgraded to C model standard. There is also a fleet-wide wing inspection in progress. The older, thin-wing birds are having their wings replaced. After that, the avionics upgrade will continue, so that all existing flyable jets will be converted to C's.


The C's here at Nellis are having the ol' gun gas ingestion stalls again. 234 kept "visiting" us at Creech until it finally cracked it's wing.

_________________
Vipers Fight while Raptors Train.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic