| Author |
Message |
|
ATFS_Crash
|
Posted: Jul 16, 2008 - 06:42 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 15, 2006 - 12:28 AM
Posts: 760
|
|
Loomis wrote:
<i>I’m not wrong. You seem to misinterpret/twist what I say. </i>
I don't need to twist what you say -- it seems to come out pre-twisted. You can argue your version until you're blue in the face, but you'll still be wrong. Learn to deal with that fact.
Oh pleeeeaase
As is obvious by your posts, you took things out of context, probably because you’re shallow minded and prejudice. Even though I spoon fed you, you are not willing to admit or discern the difference between what you said and what I said. If you can’t discern the difference between what I said was derived from the book, and what was literally said by the book; then you must be very stupid. I find it hard to believe that you’re that stupid after the spoon feeding I gave you. Therefore I think you lack the honor to admit that you’re wrong. I think you’re too hardheaded and stubborn to admit that you are wrong. I’m starting to become suspicious that you are just a troll trying to derail the thread. Unlike you I do not let things bother me to the extent it makes me blue in my face. You seem to have honor and integrity issues.
Kool-Aid being used as vernacular to describe cultist behavior was used in my area long before cocaine Mayor Marion Barry, and long before the Jonestown massacre. ( yet you claim to know that it wasn’t used as popular vernacular in my area prior to the Jonestown massacre; which gives you the appearance of trying to lie, bluff and bully your way of your own ignorance) Just because you weren’t born yet when it was being used or didn’t become aware of it until it became widespread usage after national celebrities started to use our vernacular; doesn’t mean that we didn’t use it first.
Just because the usage of the word Kool-Aid in the book “Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test” isn’t the same as the popular vernacular doesn’t mean that the vernacular was not derived from the book. The figurative that is derived from the original is not the same as the original. Face it, though I doubt you will have the honor to do so. The truth seems to be you can’t handle the facts.
The region where I grew up is a birthplace/origin too many new vernaculars.
For a while “please” was being considered to add new definitions in the dictionary, all because of a local schoolteacher that insisted that if the teacher wasn’t speaking loud enough, that their students say “please“, to request to the teacher to speak louder. The usage of please in this definition is very similar to “come again”; used as a request to repeat a statement. “Please” also came to mean; to request a re-phrasal/clarification of a statement so that others may be better able to understand. “Please”also came to mean a way to challenge a statement politely as being totally ridiculous or perhaps misheard. Such as “Oh pleeeeaase” . Sometimes the differences are very subtle for the different usages and can often be determined by the context, enunciation or by accent.
Such as to challenge a statement as being ridiculous or misheard, “please” is lengthened (as spoken) often adds Oh in front of it such as “Oh pleeeeaase”. This is a polite politically correct way of challenging a statement that seems to be outrageous, incorrect, or a lie.
Some of these local vernaculars didn’t become popular nationally until celebrities like Carmen Electra, Tony Snow, and George Clooney became national celebrities |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Jun 20, 2013 - 11:30 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Loomis
|
Posted: Jul 17, 2008 - 05:05 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: May 31, 2005 - 08:10 PM
Posts: 76
Status: Offline
|
| Do you froth at the mouth when you're typing in your posts? We've made a bet about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|