| Author |
Message |
|
geogen
|
 Posted: Apr 03, 2008 - 07:35 AM
|
 
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2804
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
|
| Perhaps an optimal SEAD combo in the mid-term would be 1x MALD and 3 part AGM-88E? Whether employed on MQ-Reaper or F-16? |
_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 26, 2013 - 7:47 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMIguy
|
|
Posted: Apr 03, 2008 - 12:08 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Jul 11, 2007 - 06:13 PM
Posts: 667
Status: Offline
|
|
Lajes wrote:
Has the LOAL version of the Mav entered service somewhere?
For those who do not know: it's a Mav fitted with a mini data link, a rail with a data link, and from that on, the hardware is the same. The video link does not break off when the weapon leaves the a/c, and the other way around it is still possible to send cueing, lock on, and FOV (pinky), etc. commands to the missile while in flight. In theory it means that the full kinematic envelope of the missile can be utilised, as it flies itself to a point where the performance of the EO head (CCD) makes fine aimpoint selection/lock possible, instead of the launching aircraft carrying it to that point. Makes Mav into a kind of "stand off" weapon.
Lajes
The MAV is a stand off weapon. Seems rather redundant feature the way you describe the function.
This is a statement from Raytheon; "We will integrate a digital weapon datalink,
Global Positioning System/ Inertial Navigation System, a UHF network datalink
radio, and design the missile and Maverick launcher upgrades so they are
transparent to any Maverick-capable aircraft -- true plug-and-play integration. We look forward to demonstrating the feasibility of utilizing existing
technology and the operational Situational Awareness Data Link network. This
capability could significantly enhance the aircrew's situation awareness by
transmitting imagery over the network and displaying it on the cockpit
displays without changing the aircraft operational flight program,"
Nothing here suggest continued video link, this is datalink display only, which is a completely different thing.
So far, nothing has been included in the budget for next year, and until I see procurement funding, I don’t think they will be building a lot of these. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loomis
|
|
Posted: Apr 03, 2008 - 07:21 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: May 31, 2005 - 08:10 PM
Posts: 76
Status: Offline
|
rickster: thanks for the link. I believe the dual mode they're referring to on the LAU-117 is the analog/MIL-STD-1760 interface, not the capability of carrying multiple weapons. That's similar to what ITT/EDO/MTech (I hope they don't use permanent marker on their logo) has done with the Enhanced Smart TER. That might be in conjunction with the LOAL Lajes describes since the LOAL Maverick is probably a 1760 weapon.
ACMIguy: check this link: www.raytheon.com/media/afa07/pdf/maverick.pdf It specifically describes data-linked video from the Maverick. While "standoff" is in the eye of the beholder, anytime I have to be close enough to visually designate a target would not be standoffish enough to me. "Take off and nuke it from orbit" is my kind of battle plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMIguy
|
|
Posted: Apr 04, 2008 - 02:38 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Jul 11, 2007 - 06:13 PM
Posts: 667
Status: Offline
|
|
Loomis wrote:
ACMIguy: check this link: www.raytheon.com/media/afa07/pdf/maverick.pdf It specifically describes data-linked video from the Maverick. While "standoff" is in the eye of the beholder, anytime I have to be close enough to visually designate a target would not be standoffish enough to me. "Take off and nuke it from orbit" is my kind of battle plan.
I stand corrected they do advertise video in the promo you sent.
Nevertheless, it is still not in the budget. No money no missile.
I think the selling point would be to make sure of your target, no collateral damage.
My theory is kill them all and let God sort them out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
velos35
|
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2008 - 02:10 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 10, 2006 - 06:19 PM
Posts: 41
Status: Offline
|
| Yes its possible!This ia a configuration usually for a DEAD mission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cali
|
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2008 - 07:53 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 30, 2008 - 07:52 PM
Posts: 50
Status: Offline
|
|
habu2 wrote:
3x Mavericks on LAU-88s on STA # & 7 is a valid load for AGM-65As, Bs and Ds, but not Gs. The Gs can only be carried in singles on LAU-117s. Not sure why, but that's what's listed in the stores lists.
Got any pictures are a website saying that info? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guysmiley
|
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2008 - 08:33 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496
|
|
Cali wrote:
habu2 wrote:
3x Mavericks on LAU-88s on STA # & 7 is a valid load for AGM-65As, Bs and Ds, but not Gs. The Gs can only be carried in singles on LAU-117s. Not sure why, but that's what's listed in the stores lists.
Got any pictures are a website saying that info?
Do you realize he posted that 4 years ago? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpudmanWP
|
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2008 - 11:27 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4280
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
| You can also load 2 LAU-117 racks on a BRU-55 rack and therefore load 2 AGM-65Gs on a single pylon. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cali
|
|
Posted: May 01, 2008 - 08:52 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 30, 2008 - 07:52 PM
Posts: 50
Status: Offline
|
|
Guysmiley wrote:
Cali wrote:
habu2 wrote:
3x Mavericks on LAU-88s on STA # & 7 is a valid load for AGM-65As, Bs and Ds, but not Gs. The Gs can only be carried in singles on LAU-117s. Not sure why, but that's what's listed in the stores lists.
Got any pictures are a website saying that info?
Do you realize he posted that 4 years ago?
LMAO never looked at the date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
