Forum: F-35 Design & Construction

Refueling probe



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Scorpion82
PostPosted: Mar 22, 2008 - 05:41 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Oct 07, 2007 - 07:52 PM
Posts: 992

Status: Offline
Well such a possibility would be great considering that many airforces around the word are operating the hose & drogue system and potential customers will most likely select the F-35, though a couple of current F-16 operators are operating boom tankers.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 19, 2013 - 2:39 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Mar 23, 2008 - 01:32 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1907

Status: Offline
Scorpion82 wrote:
Hi all,
it is known that the F-35A has the AAR intake on the top for boom refueling. But what about the F-35B/C? The USMC and USN as well as many other nations are used to probes for the drogue/basket system. I suppose the B/C will get a retractable probe in the right forward fuselage, but has this been confirmed? And is there any chance that F-35As will be offered with this for export?



You must of missed much of the debate on this issue? Some seem to think to offer the Probe/Basket Refueling System to the landbased F-35A would require extensive (i.e. costly) modifcation. Personally, I am no so sure? As all models of the F-35 share a very common airframe. Further, if all three models are to be constructed on the same assembly line. I believe its very likely either system could to used. That said, I am not privy to F-35 so that my best guess. Wink Of course it would be just one more selling point for the Lightning. Thereby, giving the "Customer" the options that best suit its needs and wants.......... Very Happy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
StolichnayaStrafer
PostPosted: Mar 23, 2008 - 01:04 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 20, 2008 - 04:50 PM
Posts: 854
Location: Dodge City, Moscowchusetts
Status: Offline
I would say that installing either aerial refueling system is the LEAST of their worries in developing and building these aircraft right now. Wink

_________________
Why is the vodka gone?
Why is the vodka always gone... oh- that's why!
Hide the vodka!!!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Mar 24, 2008 - 03:13 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1907

Status: Offline
StolichnayaStrafer wrote:
I would say that installing either aerial refueling system is the LEAST of their worries in developing and building these aircraft right now. Wink


The F-35 is hardly in trouble! As a matter of fact as fighter programs go its doing reasonably well. Remember, its not uncommon to lose aircraft during developement and sometimes aircrew. Sad


Considering how complex it is and with three very different models. I would have to say its doing very well! Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LMAggie
PostPosted: Mar 24, 2008 - 04:46 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 12, 2007 - 08:43 AM
Posts: 579

Status: Offline
Corsair1963 wrote:
StolichnayaStrafer wrote:
I would say that installing either aerial refueling system is the LEAST of their worries in developing and building these aircraft right now. Wink


The F-35 is hardly in trouble! As a matter of fact as fighter programs go its doing reasonably well. Remember, its not uncommon to lose aircraft during developement and sometimes aircrew. Sad


Considering how complex it is and with three very different models. I would have to say its doing very well! Wink


I think Stoli is just saying that out of all the systems on the aircraft, the refueling system one of the lowest risk systems. I think Stoli is also trying to say to that they are focused on building to the designs they have now, not ones that may come in the future. But yes, given the requirements and resources dealt to the program, they are on par with past programs that werent subjected to off-based criticism.

_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Mar 24, 2008 - 05:12 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1907

Status: Offline
LMAggie wrote:
Corsair1963 wrote:
StolichnayaStrafer wrote:
I would say that installing either aerial refueling system is the LEAST of their worries in developing and building these aircraft right now. Wink


The F-35 is hardly in trouble! As a matter of fact as fighter programs go its doing reasonably well. Remember, its not uncommon to lose aircraft during developement and sometimes aircrew. Sad


Considering how complex it is and with three very different models. I would have to say its doing very well! Wink


I think Stoli is just saying that out of all the systems on the aircraft, the refueling system one of the lowest risk systems. I think Stoli is also trying to say to that they are focused on building to the designs they have now, not ones that may come in the future. But yes, given the requirements and resources dealt to the program, they are on par with past programs that werent subjected to off-based criticism.



That is no doubt the case...........As LM needs to get the line going! Rolling Eyes
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
geogen
PostPosted: Mar 24, 2008 - 08:35 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2804
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
It would be kinda nice I guess, if the C mod at least, could be refuelled by the SuperH probe sys?

_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Mar 24, 2008 - 04:28 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1907

Status: Offline
geogen wrote:
It would be kinda nice I guess, if the C mod at least, could be refuelled by the SuperH probe sys?





Both the B and C Model of the F-35 will be equipped with the Standard Probe/Basket System as the Super Hornet and most Allied Countries use....... Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
asiatrails
PostPosted: Apr 01, 2008 - 03:55 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 30, 2005 - 03:11 AM
Posts: 865

Status: Offline
Here's hoping that it stays in service as long as the AV8A Harrier.

The Harrier entered service on 01 April 1969 with #1 Squadron, and was declared operationally available the following year. - 39 years and counting


Guiness
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic