| Author |
Message |
|
Orangeburst
|
 Posted: Jan 04, 2008 - 01:33 AM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: May 29, 2006 - 04:17 PM
Posts: 56
Status: Offline
|
I see that LM has developed an IRST for the SH and Raytheon has the ATFLIR. I was wondering if the two systems were competitive or respective to A2A or A2G operations. Considering the loadout on the pdf front page, I would think the IRST is for A2A and ATFLIR for A2G. Interesting that the IRST is a combo sensor with 330 gallon fuel tank compared to operational configuration issues with the ATFLIR (port side tank view).
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/asse ... t_Card.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 26, 2013 - 4:07 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lightndattic
|
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2008 - 03:10 PM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Oct 06, 2005 - 01:43 PM
Posts: 494
Location: Dallas, Texas
Status: Offline
|
I know I'm opening a can of worms with this comment, but here goes....
Nothing says you can't do your job without extra bags than building your sensors into them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guysmiley
|
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2008 - 03:26 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496
|
I'm guessing those will be non-jettisonable then? 
From that document, it looks like they are using the same sensor as was on the F-14D? I don't know why else you'd cite the 200,000 flight hours. Or are they just saying "hey, we made the AN/AAS-42, we know what we're doing"? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elp
|
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2008 - 05:17 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor
Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147
|
Taking an already luke warm airframe performance jet and putting an IRST/centerline fuel tank on it as form-function for air to air has to be the height of desperation. "Look we have IRST too". Where it can be a nose job a la F-16, standard equipment on Eurofighter, RuTech etc.  |
_________________
- ELP -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
