Forum: F-16 Design & Construction

MCID versus NSI inlets



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
habu2
PostPosted: Feb 09, 2007 - 03:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2811

Status: Offline
The link below details the Block 25/30/32 production period when NSI and MCID inlets "overlapped". This is a definitive list compiled by General Dynamics.

http://www.habu2.net/vipers/viperblocks/viperinlets.html

(edited for typos) Embarassed

_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation


Last edited by habu2 on Feb 09, 2007 - 03:38 PM; edited 2 times in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 19, 2013 - 9:04 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor







Last edited by habu2 on Feb 09, 2007 - 03:38 PM; edited 2 times in total
  Send private message  
 
falcon-watcher
PostPosted: Feb 09, 2007 - 03:35 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jan 24, 2004 - 08:46 PM
Posts: 105

Status: Offline
Holy cow! I didn't realize how difficult this was going to be.

1) of course I did an EXTENSIVE Google search before posting here. Posting here was a last resort.
2) This is the perfect place to ask such an arcane question since somebody knows the answer or how to get close. Look at Habu2's picture of the two inlets side by side. You could have searched Google till you were blue in the face and not found that. But someone (habu2 in this case) remembered he had this info and that's exactly what I was hoping for. Now if I could only get some numbers.

What I'm asking for is a freaking apporximate linear measurement of something that anyone who goes to an airshow or visits a static display could measure. I just don't happen to have access to a Viper and air show season is over.

It was a simple question and is not sensitive in any manner.

I think some of the "cute" comments were funny; the other more serious critical comments are really not necessary for this topic.

I'm not asking anything that might summon Gums into this topic.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
habu2
PostPosted: Feb 09, 2007 - 03:37 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2811

Status: Offline
falcon-watcher, do you know the serial number of the jet from which you are trying to obtain parts?

_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
falcon-watcher
PostPosted: Feb 09, 2007 - 03:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jan 24, 2004 - 08:46 PM
Posts: 105

Status: Offline
not a clue
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
parrothead
PostPosted: Feb 15, 2007 - 05:57 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 11, 2004 - 12:04 AM
Posts: 3280

Status: Offline
Best advice if you're working on a museum display would be to contact the National Museum of the United States Air Force Smile . If it's a USAF Viper you're putting on display, they're the guys to go to for that since they still technically own the plane.

_________________
No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
F16JOAT
PostPosted: Dec 08, 2007 - 07:30 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Apr 10, 2007 - 10:16 PM
Posts: 110

Status: Offline
Don't forget, the throat area at FS189 must be taken into consideration, this is one of the key elements in the inlet redesign. There are two other inlets that have been produced but break the throat area rule, LNSI and "680" ( only one in existence is on NASA's XL with the GE engine.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic