F-22 Database

Anything goes, as long as it is about the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

juve57

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 39
  • Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:52

Unread post26 Feb 2010, 21:52

Hi guys,

Any news about these birds ?
05 4100 AK or HO ?
06 4108 and 4110 AK 90th or 525th ?
07 4132 ghost bird ?
07 4137
07 4138
07 4142
07 4145 to 4148
07 4150
08 4151
THANKS for any update !
(nb 05 4104 now a HO bird)

http://www.f-16.net/aircraft-database/F-22
Offline

raameagle

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 185
  • Joined: 15 Aug 2004, 23:59

Unread post26 Feb 2010, 22:20

05-4100 is still marked AK but may be on its way to HO? It is currently at Nellis on Red Flag!

Regards

Mark
Offline

Raptor_DCTR

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 663
  • Joined: 23 May 2005, 02:13

Unread post26 Feb 2010, 23:31

juve57 wrote:Hi guys,

Any news about these birds ?
05 4100 AK or HO ?
06 4108 and 4110 AK 90th or 525th ?
07 4132 ghost bird ?
07 4137
07 4138
07 4142
07 4145 to 4148
07 4150
08 4151
THANKS for any update !
(nb 05 4104 now a HO bird)


4108 and 4110 are 525 birds. 4137-4151 are 90th jets.
Offline

Asif

F-16.net Editor

F-16.net Editor

  • Posts: 2913
  • Joined: 23 Aug 2003, 12:02

Unread post27 Feb 2010, 00:37

Thanks for the updates. Anymore, please add here.
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
Offline

raameagle

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 185
  • Joined: 15 Aug 2004, 23:59

Unread post27 Feb 2010, 01:12

Is 4151 FY07 or FY08 please?
Regards
Mark
Offline

geogen

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2948
  • Joined: 11 Mar 2008, 15:28
  • Location: 45 km offshore, New England

Unread post27 Feb 2010, 03:21

For the record; especially given the premature shut-down of F-22 fleet procurement, I have a personal problem with annoucing and updating play-by-play, strategic F-22 tail numbers and deployments, etc...

Perhaps USAF would concur? Maybe I'm just misreading it.
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
Offline

checksixx

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1347
  • Joined: 20 Jul 2005, 04:28

Unread post27 Feb 2010, 04:03

Everyone already knows how many are being produced and tail (code/block) numbers are public domain...especially considering both the Air Force and Lockheed Martin release them and sometimes update that information online. No one has posted anything concerning deployments here.
Offline

Raptor_DCTR

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 663
  • Joined: 23 May 2005, 02:13

Unread post27 Feb 2010, 04:16

There's nothing "strategic" about tail numbers. If this were the case then why aren't we concerned about the extensive F-16 tail number data base on here?
Offline

geogen

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2948
  • Joined: 11 Mar 2008, 15:28
  • Location: 45 km offshore, New England

Unread post27 Feb 2010, 04:19

I'm just suggesting that perhaps we should wait(?) for USAF to make those numbers 'public' as you say, and not try to advise ourselves beforehand?

Absolutely there is a tactical interest, regarding the actual tail-number/inter-squadron changing??

Especially with a preamature shut-down, small number combat-coded force to work with.. Thats all.
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
Offline

Raptor_DCTR

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 663
  • Joined: 23 May 2005, 02:13

Unread post27 Feb 2010, 04:58

There's no difference knowing Raptor tail numbers compared to Vipers or eagles or warthogs....... Numbers of PAI have nothing to do with it. Like checksixx said, LM and the AIR FORCE its self have already released tail numbers and locations. Nothing was posted about deployments or TDYs or anything of that sort. Not to mention strategic and tactical are two totally different things. And no, knowing tail numbers at bases is not going to be a huge strategic loss for us and lose the war. What the Air Force doesn't tell you is what tail numbers are where at any one time (spares, loans, BAI) and what they're doing there. That's where things differ. Knowing which tails are assigned to which base is not an issue. If the Air Force didn't want you to know assigned bases/tail nubers, there would be no base codes OR serial numbers painted on the tails.
Offline

juve57

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 39
  • Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:52

Unread post28 Feb 2010, 09:03

Hi,

seen on FENCE CHECK website, 05-4104 with HO markings (RED FLAG 10)

and what happens with 07-4132 ? Impossible finding markings ...
thanks for your hepl !!
Offline

raameagle

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 185
  • Joined: 15 Aug 2004, 23:59

Unread post28 Feb 2010, 11:44

I believe 07-4132 to be at Edwards but no visual confirmation yet.

Regards

Mark
Offline

Elliboom

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 426
  • Joined: 05 Apr 2006, 18:21
  • Location: Lincoln, NE

Unread post28 Feb 2010, 20:42

Here's confimation of 4104 being an HO bird
Attachments
DSC05141.JPG
Offline

Asif

F-16.net Editor

F-16.net Editor

  • Posts: 2913
  • Joined: 23 Aug 2003, 12:02

Unread post28 Feb 2010, 21:14

Elliboom wrote:Here's confimation of 4104 being an HO bird


Which Squadron she gone to as the badge has been painted over.
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
Offline

checksixx

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1347
  • Joined: 20 Jul 2005, 04:28

Unread post01 Mar 2010, 07:31

The Holloman crew have been getting some of Langley's jets as Langley recieves new Raptors.
Next

Return to General F-22A Raptor forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest