F-35 "brake problem" - 03 May 2007

Design and construction
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

KeithTCU82

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 28
  • Joined: 30 Sep 2005, 15:32

Unread post03 May 2007, 23:29

Today at NAS Fort Worth (5-3-07)
Attachments
IMG_0123b.jpg
Someone with a scanner had heard it was something related to brakes.
IMG_0016.jpg
Offline

Corsair1963

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 6640
  • Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14

Unread post04 May 2007, 01:39

Man as long as the aircraft isn't damaged... :applause:
Offline

dwightlooi

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1170
  • Joined: 02 Aug 2006, 00:14

Unread post04 May 2007, 04:00

The F-35 looks fantastically sleek and pretty from these two angles though.
Offline
User avatar

PhillyGuy

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 637
  • Joined: 29 Sep 2006, 03:07

Unread post04 May 2007, 06:43

Man, you really get a sense of how big and tall the F-35 is with that guy standing next to it, it puts things into perspective...
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
Offline

Neno

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 221
  • Joined: 29 Sep 2006, 10:35
  • Location: Italy

Unread post04 May 2007, 07:28

It gives me the impression of an aircraft built around his engine..
Offline

idesof

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 634
  • Joined: 29 May 2006, 22:59

Unread post04 May 2007, 09:27

dwightlooi wrote:The F-35 looks fantastically sleek and pretty from these two angles though.


You remind me of "Shallow Hall," that movie where the guy looked at his girlfriend, who was hugely obese and ugly, and she looked to him like Gwyneth Paltrow. I'm sorry but the F-35 is one ugly mutha. Without a doubt the ugliest of all new fighter aircraft in the world. Looks is one aspect where the Eurofrauder Typhoon has got the F-35 beat hands down.
Offline

Lurch

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 276
  • Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 20:42

Unread post04 May 2007, 13:50

Hopefully, It's just a minor problem, and it's back up in the air soon.

I'm stuck in the middle on it's looks. It's not pretty and it's not ugly, it's just there.
Crew Chief
Torrejon 614th Lucky Devils 87-0248
Homestead/Moody 307th Stingers 89-2054 (Comander's CC)
Offline

MKopack

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 860
  • Joined: 08 Apr 2004, 22:51
  • Location: North Carolina, USA

Unread post04 May 2007, 15:13

Two comments from me (neither of which may mean anything, but I'll throw them out anyway...)

I'm with Lurch as far as the looks go, it seems that every other picture I see I go back and forth from 'good looking jet' to... All the while I'm thankful though for what 'could have been': Several years ago I was at the NAS Oceana airshow standing next to a Navy Hornet driver who was staring, open-mouthed, at the full-sized Boeing JSF mock-up. I said "You know what's even worse? Imagine it in Blue Angels (and Thunderbirds) markings..."

My second comment is for Keith Robinson, the photographer. Keith, don't you have a job, or are you lucky enough to be taking these from your porch? I've had your 'first flight' photo (from Fencecheck) as my Windows background for a couple of months now, and it seems that every time they pull the bird out of the barn, you're there to catch it! Great job covering the beginning of what will be the next 30+ years of military aviation.

Mike Kopack
F-16A/B/C/D P&W/GE Crew Chief and Phased Maint.
56TTW/63TFTS 1987-1989
401TFW/614TFS 1989-1991
Offline

KeithTCU82

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 28
  • Joined: 30 Sep 2005, 15:32

Unread post04 May 2007, 21:23

MKopack wrote:
My second comment is for Keith Robinson, the photographer. Keith, don't you have a job, or are you lucky enough to be taking these from your porch? I've had your 'first flight' photo (from Fencecheck) as my Windows background for a couple of months now, and it seems that every time they pull the bird out of the barn, you're there to catch it! Great job covering the beginning of what will be the next 30+ years of military aviation.

Mike Kopack


Luck. . . and I have a job where I go in at 3pm so that helps. Also living less than 5 miles from Lockheed-Martin/NAS Fort Worth is also an advantage. I pulled up yesterday not knowing anything about the F-35 having problems and looked down the runway to see it surrounded by emergency vehicles.
Offline

Ztex

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 186
  • Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 17:17

Unread post08 May 2007, 05:02

Luck?!

You are one "lucky" SOB... :P

Good catch!

Z
Offline

KeithTCU82

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 28
  • Joined: 30 Sep 2005, 15:32

Unread post08 May 2007, 06:01

Thanks Z

I have since found out that the F-35 had an electrical malfunction, and not a brake problem. Sorry for the misinformation.
Attachments
IMG_0029.jpg
Offline

idesof

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 634
  • Joined: 29 May 2006, 22:59

Unread post08 May 2007, 17:20

KeithTCU82 wrote:Thanks Z

I have since found out that the F-35 had an electrical malfunction, and not a brake problem. Sorry for the misinformation.


Well, so much for its vaunted reliability. Any clue about the nature of the malfunction and whether it has gone back up again?
Offline

MKopack

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 860
  • Joined: 08 Apr 2004, 22:51
  • Location: North Carolina, USA

Unread post08 May 2007, 17:45

idesof wrote:Well, so much for its vaunted reliability. Any clue about the nature of the malfunction and whether it has gone back up again?


Vaunted reliability? Wow, with this 'electrical issue' and you're ready to write the whole thing off? How much time have you spent on a flightline? What do you think the ratio of Code 2 & 3's is to Code 1's?

If airplanes fly they are going to break - especially when it's a unique, hand-built, very pre-production bird. Military aviation isn't like jumping in your car.

Mike
F-16A/B/C/D P&W/GE Crew Chief and Phased Maint.
56TTW/63TFTS 1987-1989
401TFW/614TFS 1989-1991
Offline

Scorpion1alpha

F-16.net Moderator

F-16.net Moderator

  • Posts: 1688
  • Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:47

Unread post08 May 2007, 19:30

MKopack wrote:
idesof wrote:Well, so much for its vaunted reliability. Any clue about the nature of the malfunction and whether it has gone back up again?


Vaunted reliability? Wow, with this 'electrical issue' and you're ready to write the whole thing off? How much time have you spent on a flightline? What do you think the ratio of Code 2 & 3's is to Code 1's?


Apparently he is. :roll: And in regards to the flightline, I betting a big donut.
Offline

dwightlooi

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1170
  • Joined: 02 Aug 2006, 00:14

Unread post08 May 2007, 21:06

Scorpion1alpha wrote:
MKopack wrote:
idesof wrote:Well, so much for its vaunted reliability. Any clue about the nature of the malfunction and whether it has gone back up again?


Vaunted reliability? Wow, with this 'electrical issue' and you're ready to write the whole thing off? How much time have you spent on a flightline? What do you think the ratio of Code 2 & 3's is to Code 1's?


Apparently he is. :roll: And in regards to the flightline, I betting a big donut.


We don't know how "serious" the problem is. It may be something minor enough that the aircraft will fly just fine other than a a little warning light coming on in the cockpit saying that some circuit monitoring system is reading out of the normal range.
Next

Return to F-35 Design & Construction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests