Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluation

Falcon 4 and other PC based simulators, homebuilt simulators, Unit Training Devices and Weapons System Trainers
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

swiss

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 451
  • Joined: 10 Jan 2017, 14:43

Unread post25 Mar 2019, 21:48

Thanks for your great work litzj.
Offline

litzj

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 00:29

Unread post02 Apr 2019, 13:31

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... art-3.html

I conducted sensitivity analysis for the hardware specification of the four missiles
Offline

litzj

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 00:29

Unread post19 May 2019, 01:16

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... art-3.html​​​​

Before I expand my simulation, there is few additional result for AIM-120 related stuff
Offline

garrya

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 851
  • Joined: 25 Dec 2015, 12:43

Unread post19 May 2019, 02:23

litzj wrote:https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/05/aim-120c-study-using-missile-sim-part-3.html​​​​

Before I expand my simulation, there is few additional result for AIM-120 related stuff

Spurt made a similar missile sim, i figured his result can be useful to you
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=25735&start=1200
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=25735&start=1110
Offline

litzj

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 00:29

Unread post14 Sep 2019, 08:41

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... or_14.html

I have tested generic ATACMS model and its air-launched version
Offline

litzj

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 00:29

Unread post03 Nov 2019, 13:43

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... ocket.html

effectiveness of AASM type weapon is analyzed
Offline

sprstdlyscottsmn

Elite 4K

Elite 4K

  • Posts: 4800
  • Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
  • Location: Phoenix, Az, USA

Unread post04 Nov 2019, 04:45

Nice work
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
Offline

litzj

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 00:29

Unread post13 Nov 2019, 14:52

I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)
Offline

sprstdlyscottsmn

Elite 4K

Elite 4K

  • Posts: 4800
  • Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
  • Location: Phoenix, Az, USA

Unread post13 Nov 2019, 15:20

That is some really impressive stuff. Hats off to your modeling!
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
Offline

garrya

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 851
  • Joined: 25 Dec 2015, 12:43

Unread post14 Nov 2019, 04:19

litzj wrote:I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)

Isn't Kh-47 range supposed to be 3000 Km ?
Offline

litzj

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 00:29

Unread post14 Nov 2019, 16:07

garrya wrote:
litzj wrote:I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)

Isn't Kh-47 range supposed to be 3000 Km ?


As you could see in the result, range can be extended depending on glide angle of it.
Offline

litzj

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 00:29

Unread post21 Nov 2019, 11:58

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/1 ... daski.html

Russian version of CUDAski is possible.
Offline

litzj

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 00:29

Unread post02 Feb 2020, 02:45

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02 ... n-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range
Offline
User avatar

sferrin

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 5571
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

Unread post07 Feb 2020, 12:24

litzj wrote:http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02/missile-sim-performance-evaluation-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range


A large missile should have a higher sectional density. (More mass behind each square inch of frontal area, assuming it's not a short, fat missile.) So it should slow down at a lower rate.

Would you be interested in taking a shot at a 2 or 3-stage ATACMs? I can send you some models.

TEL.jpg
"There I was. . ."
Offline

litzj

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 00:29

Unread post15 Mar 2020, 07:06

sferrin wrote:
litzj wrote:http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02/missile-sim-performance-evaluation-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range


A large missile should have a higher sectional density. (More mass behind each square inch of frontal area, assuming it's not a short, fat missile.) So it should slow down at a lower rate.

Would you be interested in taking a shot at a 2 or 3-stage ATACMs? I can send you some models.

TEL.jpg


Good to see you here.

I have tested ATACMS options with booster (https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/1 ... n-for.html)

I am now currently code-working for Flight-SIM capable of full-flight simulation including T.O/L.D/SID/STAR/Optimal Cruise
Previous

Return to F-16 Simulators

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests