Swiss Lightning?

Program progress, politics, orders, and speculation
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Tiger05

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 97
  • Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 15:55

Unread post20 Jun 2019, 10:07

rheonomic wrote:What are the odds the procurement goes through this time instead of getting cancelled in a referendum?


I am wondering too... I have the feeling that this new competition might just be a fool's errand. Given the strength of the anti-military lobby in Switzerland and the general disinterest in defense matters from the Swiss population, they might be crazy enough to reject this procurement of new jets. If that were to be the case, this would not bode well for the future of the Swiss AF's fighter component. :|
Offline
User avatar

XanderCrews

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 6247
  • Joined: 16 Oct 2012, 19:42

Unread post20 Jun 2019, 13:56

rheonomic wrote:What are the odds the procurement goes through this time instead of getting cancelled in a referendum?


If your'e gonna win the lottery you gotta buy a ticket
Choose Crews
Offline

loke

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 844
  • Joined: 14 Nov 2008, 19:07

Unread post20 Jun 2019, 16:15

XanderCrews wrote:
SH got discluded on the first round because it woudn't fit into their mountainside hangars.

Any sources for that claim?

AFAIK SH was invited but they choose to withdraw:
“After a thorough review of Switzerland’s requirements for partial replacement of its Tiger fighter aircraft, Boeing has decided not to enter the competition due to the disparity between the requirements for an F-5 replacement aircraft and the next-generation capabilities of the F/A-18E/F Block II Super Hornet

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... ce-223401/

"too big" and "next-generatoin capabilities" don't sound like the same thing to me...


I suspect the real reason SH dropped out from the first round was that they believed the SH would not fit into the budget...? and/or could not meet requirements in terms of ToT and/or industrial offsets -- but I would guess mainly the budget -- and history proved them to be right for the first round.
Offline
User avatar

XanderCrews

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 6247
  • Joined: 16 Oct 2012, 19:42

Unread post20 Jun 2019, 17:07

loke wrote:
XanderCrews wrote:
SH got discluded on the first round because it woudn't fit into their mountainside hangars.

Any sources for that claim?

AFAIK SH was invited but they choose to withdraw:
“After a thorough review of Switzerland’s requirements for partial replacement of its Tiger fighter aircraft, Boeing has decided not to enter the competition due to the disparity between the requirements for an F-5 replacement aircraft and the next-generation capabilities of the F/A-18E/F Block II Super Hornet

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... ce-223401/

"too big" and "next-generatoin capabilities" don't sound like the same thing to me...


I suspect the real reason SH dropped out from the first round was that they believed the SH would not fit into the budget...? and/or could not meet requirements in terms of ToT and/or industrial offsets -- but I would guess mainly the budget -- and history proved them to be right for the first round.




Hornet vs. Super Hornet
(click to view full)
Boeing’s F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet offered the advantage of some commonalities with Switzerland’s existing F/A-18C/D Hornet fleet, even if the actual commonality rating is under 30%. It’s also a mid-tier aircraft, with likely flyaway costs of $60-75 million for a new customer. It was difficult to imagine a scenario in which the original Swiss budget yielded enough Super Hornet aircraft, and as is often the case in Europe, opposition to sales from American firms was expected to be a factor.

"Concerns were also expressed about the ability to fit these aircraft into the Swiss aircraft shelters, many of which are carved into mountainsides; indeed, there had been rumors that the Super Hornet would be excluded from the competition on those grounds alone.

The Super Hornet offered solid performance, and was a legitimate competitor, with pricing that could match or beat competitors like the Rafale and Eurofighter – but it was flying into strong headwinds. In the end, the questions became moot. Boeing looked at the RFP requirements, and bowed out."

source Defense industry daily aggreagator site

And isn't boeing offering BLOCK III now? So they somehow found a way to "forgive" themselves for the "disparity"
of having to replace the lowly F-5 :roll:

I'd believe that the hangar space issue was more real than Boeing just not having the heart to sell airplanes :roll:
Choose Crews
Offline

krieger22

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 84
  • Joined: 10 Jul 2018, 22:02

Unread post25 Jul 2019, 17:29

Lockheed Martin posted a "highlight reel" of the F-35 over Switzerland

https://twitter.com/thef35/status/11544 ... 92832?s=20
Offline

Corsair1963

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 6412
  • Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14

Unread post29 Aug 2019, 05:07

Making the case for the F-35???

Swiss seek package deal of ground-based weapons, combat aircraft
By: Sebastian Sprenger


COLOGNE, Germany — The Swiss government plans to make the integration of combat aircraft and ground-based air defense assets a key benchmark in its planned $8 billion Air 2030 program, according to officials.


Program leaders disclosed the desire for a high degree of interplay between the two competing missile-defense offers and four possible aircraft types during a news conference in the capital Bern earlier this month. The comments reveal a new front in the selection criteria for one of Europe’s most prized defense acquisitions, where the air and ground portions had always existed as separate tracks.


Fear of fratricide in Switzerland’s small and crowded airspace is one of two key factors driving the need for close integration between ground and aerial assets, said Swiss Air Force Col. Marco Forrer. Given the country’s alpine terrain and the requirement to hit targets more than 50 kilometers away and over 12 kilometers high, official are concerned about erroneously downing civilian planes, he said.


“That’s why BodLuv has to be integrated into the Air Force operational picture and command-and-control network,” Forrer said, referring to the German-language acronym for the ground-based program Bodengestützte Luftverteidigung.

Forrer added that a high level of integration also is crucial to keeping costs down, enabling air defenders to engage targets with greater precision and — hopefully — fewer misses.

https://www.defensenews.com/global/euro ... -aircraft/
Offline
User avatar

doge

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 388
  • Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 16:07

Unread post16 Sep 2019, 17:51

I found an Italian's article about Switzerland F-35. The language is Italian. (I used Google Translate.)
https://www.aresdifesa.it/2019/06/13/pr ... -svizzera/
This new article adds Rafale, Typhoon, F/A-18EF. https://www.aviation-report.com/svizzer ... et-legacy/
The underline is my favorite part. 8)
The article says that the Range or Radius of the F-35 is longer than the competitors. :shock: (!?)
How much is the range for Rafale, Typhoon, F/A-18EF, (Gripen E?)? :devil:
Official presentation of the F-35 to Switzerland
June 13, 2019 Gianluca Conversi
“In the short term, the stealth technology of our fifth-generation platforms, F-22 and F-35, is the price of combat admission. The lethality of advanced air defense systems continues to grow against fourth-generation aircraft ". General Mark Welsh, former Chief of Staff, US Air Force
The Swiss Army "defends the country and protects its population".
In order to continue to fulfill this constitutional mandate, the Air Force must renew almost all of their resources for the protection of Switzerland from air threats. The F / A-18 Hornet fighter planes will reach the end of their lives in 2030, while, now, the remaining F-5 Tigers can be used for the air police service only during the day and in good visibility conditions, not having anyway no chance of success against an opponent with even slightly more modern aircraft. For this reason, the Swiss Federal Council has authorized the Federal Department of Defense, Civil Protection and Sport (DDPS) to plan the renewal of all the vehicles currently in service or missing (such as medium-long range air defense) for a maximum amount of CHF 8 billion.

As for the replacement of the two combat aircraft, the few and older light fighters Northrop F-5E Tiger II in service since 1978 and the more modern McDonnell-Douglas (now Boeing) F / A-18C / D Hornet bi-reactor, the DDPS has pre-selected 5 aircraft manufacturers to present an offer that includes 100% industrial offsets for Swiss industries, logistics support, training and of course the purchase of "up to" 40 aircraft. The evaluation coordinated by Armasuisse, called Air2030, involved the analysis of the bids received, the ground and flight tests from the Payerne base of the aircraft offered with Swiss personnel (still in progress), the compatibility check of tracks, junctions, hangars, shelters (including the famous Meiringen caves), analysis of the data collected and the subsequent presentation to the Federal Council by September 2019 to arrive at the conclusion of the final contract by mid-2020.

The planes will have to enter quickly, hopefully starting from 2025, the year in which the " phase-out " of the surviving Hornets will begin. Eurofighter (via Airbus), Boeing, Dassault, Lockheed Martin and Saab are the manufacturers involved in the Swiss requirement with their EF-2000 Typhoon jets, F / A-18E / F Super Hornet, Rafale, F-35A and Jas-39E Gripen NG. Lockheed Martin's other best-selling plane was not selected, the F-16 in its most recent and “gadget” version V. The official press conference on the sidelines of the Axalp 2018 aviation shots held by the new Swiss "Divisional" Air Force Commander Bernhard "Beni" Müller has well described the international political-military framework with the return of power politics and the way to go to get to the renewal of the combat aircraft fleet.

Müller's intervention continued, recalling that fighter planes remain in service for at least thirty years and that it is not possible to predict today, in such a broad temporal mirror, what the world situation could be when entering service of new means and in which technological scenario would also be called upon to work, consequently which security policy can be implemented now and which airplanes will be suitable for tomorrow's challenges, ie after 2030. All this introduces the presentation of the fourth candidate whose evaluation is in the final phase, that is the only true fifth generation aircraft currently in service in the world and able to carry out the tasks of the "after 2030": the Lockheed Martin F-35. Last June 7th we attended the day that Lockheed Martin, Armasuisse (the body that coordinates purchases of defense equipment) and Schweizer Armee dedicated to Media and Aviation Enthusiasts (official Media Day in the morning and Spotters Day in the afternoon).

Information of respect for the public and the media is held in high regard at every level; both the Armed Forces and Armasuisse produce regular reports and the selection of candidates for the new combat aircraft has been widely publicized; participation in events, public, was addressed in a structured, professional, transparent manner and shared with the media well in advance. With the exclusion of the public media, it was possible to register through dedicated websites for Media Day and Spotters Day of each demonstration until reaching the maximum number of candidates envisaged by Armasuisse; registrations took place within a specific time frame and no waivers or favors were granted to anyone. A confirmation e-mail with the instructions, once the ritual checks have been completed, has arrived to the registered guests. Certainly, as far as public relations are concerned, Switzerland has adopted an admirable policy that deserves to be replicated.

In Switzerland, the sharing (always within certain limits) of sensitive decisions that touch on the one hand national security, industry and employment - not to forget the impact on tax payers - takes place with the appropriate emphasis and sharing with the citizens of the Confederation who in many situations are called to the polls to choose or reject the choices of the Federal Council by referendum, also to validate or reject the purchase of combat aircraft. In 1993, 57.2% of Swiss voters voted in favor of buying 34 F / A-18 Hornets (4 two-seaters) but, called to the polls in May 2014, the purchase of 22 Saab Jas-39C / D fighters Gripen was rejected by 53.4% ​​of voters. The hot controversies surrounding the Joint Strike Fighter were of that time and analysts at the time believed that the scenario in which the vote was organized influenced the outcome of the vote. Five years later, the Gripen E is still a prototype, the Eurofighter Tranche 4 (advocated by Airbus for the German Luftwaffe) does not fly at all.

The Super Hornet in the Block III version is being industrialized and can guarantee 60% compatibility with the current structures that support the current legacy Hornet fleet, while the Dassault Rafale (F4 version) is driven by government pressure very strong and from the recent purchase of 19 Pilatus PC-21 trainers by the Armée de l'Air which could (around 2030 ... coincidence?) replace the obsolete Alpha Jet E of the Patrouille de France with the Swiss turboprops. The ones listed above, no matter what the builders say, are fourth-generation planes or, as it is usually called, of fourth plus (4+).


The F-35 for Switzerland
Unlike previous builders who sent a pair of aircraft including two-seater aircraft, Lockheed Martin and USAF brought 4 F-35A Lightning II from 34th Fighter Squadron "Raw Rams" to Hill AFB, Utah, to Switzerland. preceded by a Boeing C-17A "Globemaster III" cargo of the 437Th AW / 315Th "Charleston" of the "Air Mobility Command" which dumped men and materials.

The 4 F-35As arrived in Payerne on the evening of May 31 last came from the Aviano base where they arrived along with 8 other aircraft.

The press conference for the presentation of the F-35 SI aircraft was carried out surrounded by a massive multi-level marketing effort (information brochures, aircraft models, flight simulators, helmets and ALIS, various gadgets, leaflets but also accompanied by a sumptuous catering service not only for media and authorities but also… hear hears… for spotters and simple citizens who have approached the Payerne base networks.

A scenario of this type very difficult to see in our latitudes.

According to many, Lockheed Martin has largely outclassed, at least at the commercial level, the presentations of Airbus, Boeing and Dassault and we will see what Saab will do as the last contender to present its own aircraft.

The press conference was attended by Steve Callaghan of Lockheed Martin, Program Director F-35 & Navy, of the USAF military Colonel David Buchanan (USAF) of the Joint Program Office (JPO), Colonel Drew “Growler” Allen of the USA Integration Office , Colonel Michael Miles of the 388th Maintenance Group commander, Hill AFB and John "Bama" Montgomery of Northrop-Grumman Airborne C4ISR Systems.

Other executives from Pratt & Whitney (engine supplier) and Lockheed contributed to the Media Day.

Lockheed Martin speakers understood the Swiss requirement and reaffirmed how important it is for Switzerland to maintain political and military neutrality, but in an increasingly turbulent world that is continually evolving, the F-35 is the best platform that is offered to Swiss armed forces to adapt and better face these threats now as in the decades to come. Peace and stability are too important not to be guaranteed and the F-35, with its revolutionary technology, allows nations that are endowed, small or large, to maintain Peace through this strength which is the 5th generation aircraft offered.

Selecting the JSF, Switzerland would obviously enter the group of 13 nations that currently have ordered it and in a world where threats are increasingly sophisticated, the F-35 offers the air-policing mission (primary for the Schweizer Luftwaffe) just as sophisticated responsiveness.

The pilot's intervention by Colonel Drew "Growler" Allen, focused on the technical capabilities of the aircraft and its peculiar characteristics that allow a rapid take-off and the achievement of the cruising altitude in a very short time thanks to the most powerful engine ever mounted on a fighter plane that within a few years should exceed 41,000 pounds of thrust thanks to new investments and improvement projects for this already efficient and reliable product by Pratt & Whitney.

The other aspect emphasized, is the ability of the F-35 to remain in flight longer than all the other contenders, reducing the number of daily sorties; in fact, none of the contenders can go further and stay in the air more than what can be obtained from the F-35.

Switzerland does not have a supply company, so the autonomy of the new fighter can be crucial.

Colonel David Buchanan, in addition to illustrating the "state of the art" of the Joint Strike Fighter Program, stressed that the $ 80 million unit cost is competitive with 4th generation legacy aircraft.

More than 400 aircraft delivered, will be 868 in 2022 and over 500 in Europe by 2030; over 200,000 hours flown, 850 pilots and 7500 trained airmen located on 17 bases that will become 30 in 2022 make it already a best-seller.

With regard to industrial opportunities, it has been specified that 25% of each aircraft flying in the world mounts components manufactured in Europe and even Swiss aircraft will surely have “Made In Switzerland” parts on board.

This is certainly the weak link in Lockheed Martin's proposal, so 100% offset will have to be achieved through other programs.

In the short Question Time that closed the official part and preceded the visit to the track to photograph one of the 4 planes present in the base and attend the take-offs and landings of the second morning mission (each test mission includes 4 F / A-18 Hornet side by side 2 aircraft under evaluation), we asked the JPO about the future of Cameri, home to one of the 3 plants able to produce complete airplanes under the JSF program.

Officially, all sites produce important parts of the F-35, results of very complex agreements. The production of aircraft outside the Fort Worth, TX line is essentially the result of agreements between governments and at the moment, in addition to Italian aircraft (28 products between 2022 and in production) for the Novara plant, only 29 F are certain -35A in production for the Royal Netherlands Air Force, while the "long lead materials" intended for the manufacture of post-2022 Italian aircraft are not yet ordered.

So under-employed, with a handful of planes a year (FACO could, at full capacity, produce between 15 and 24 per year) the use of the sophisticated Cameri plant co-managed by Leonardo and Lockheed Martin on behalf of Italian Defense would seem, if not adequately sponsored, a great opportunity for now wasted at the expense of employment, induced and country-system country credibility, forcing AM and MM to receive very slowly the planes they would need.

The press conference ended with the "recap" of the points in favor of the F-35 that Armasuisse and legislators should consider as key points in the final choice:
    ・F-35 to support Swiss air defense for the next 40 years with spiral development aimed at keeping them constantly up-to-date.
    ・The most performing aircraft for Swiss Air Policing missions.
    ・Planned modernization and logistic support.
    ・Economics of scale and sustainability.
    ・Industrial participation in support of Swiss neutrality.
    ・Opportunities for integration and cooperation with US and regional operators equipped with the same aircraft.
During the missions we were able to attend, we found no problems with the airplanes presented in flight, just as the exit and return to the hangars occurred without any particular problems; after all, the F-35A is much more contained in terms of maximum dimensions compared to the current legacy Hornets which, like the "big brother" Super Hornet, have the possibility to fold their wings to reduce the overall dimensions:
    F-35A L: 15.67m W: 10.70m H: 4.33m
    F/A-18C / D L: 17.07m W: 11.43m H: 4.66m
    The other contenders:
    Rafale L: 15.27m W: 10.86m H: 5.34m
    Typhoon L: 15.96m W: 10.95m H: 5.28m
    F/A-18E / F L: 18.31m W: 13.62m H: 4.88m
    Gripen E L: 15.2m W: 8.6m H: 4.5m
The tests continued with some missions on the Alpine base of Meiringen where the narrowest spaces and the shelter in the caves can become elements of a certain relevance when all the data collected during the selection process will be compared.

The F-35 closed the demonstration phases on the ground and in the air, because Armasuisse, in a note dated June 13, invited Saab not to participate in the Gripen E evaluation which is not yet operational and is still subjected to tests by Saab; as is known, among the requirements of Air2030 there is the condition that the aircraft admitted to the ground and in-flight assessment sessions are operational during 2019, and the Gripen E is not.

As reported by the prestigious newspaper Tages Anzaiger , which came into possession of a letter from Armasuisse sent to the 5 builders last January and signed by the director of the Darko Savic organization, the Swiss armaments management would have strongly warned the participants not to send non-aircraft able to satisfy the tests required in the requirements.

Savic would also have explained that neither his management nor the Swiss people would have accepted justifications for the inadequacy of certain apparatuses provided on the plane and still not ready or being defined.

If one of the requirements was to test real aircraft, in flight and not prototypes not yet certified, it would mean for Armasuisse that they are not mature and reliable aircraft to perform the tasks required of them when they enter service. The exclusion from the tender, is specified by Tages Anzeiger, could also have been taken to flight tests in progress.

The consequences of this resounding breakthrough could mean that Saab is out of Air2030 and certainly represents a heavy setback for the Swedish manufacturer in terms of image and marketing of Gripen E.

In a communiqué issued immediately after the exclusion from flight testing, Saab states that "Gripen E is the best choice for Switzerland and the offer presented in January is still valid. Saab is ready to deliver at least 40 fighter planes on time in compliance with the requirements and with all the equipment indicated in the offer ”.

Except for sensational developments, the Gripen E is today excluded from Air2030 which, according to a survey commissioned by the same newspaper, would see the F-35 winner today followed by Super Hornet and Rafale.

Other Swiss articles and F-35.com's Swiss page have something similar as well.
https://theaviationgeekclub.com/f-35-li ... -air-base/
https://www.f35.com/global/participation/switzerland
The aircraft can be dispatched rapidly and climbs quickly. “With a high thrust engine and internal weapons, the F-35 is able to remain airborne longer than any of its competitors,” Alan Norman, Lockheed Martin F-35 Chief Test Pilot, explained to The Aviation Geek Club.
Offline

hythelday

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 587
  • Joined: 25 Jul 2016, 12:43
  • Location: Estonia

Unread post29 Jan 2020, 13:09

Swiss parliament approves Air 2030 fighter, GBAD procurement
https://www.janes.com/article/93434/swi ... rocurement

The Swiss parliament on 20 December approved the government and Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport's (VBS's) Air 2030 proposal to invest up to CHF6 billion (USD6.2 billion) to replace the Swiss Air Force's F/A-18C/D and F-5E fighters starting in 2025 and CHF2 billion in ground-based air defence (GBAD).


And fresh news from two weeks ago:

Air2030: Second request for proposals has been issued to the government authorities of the manufacturers of fighter aircraft and extended-range ground-based air defence systems
https://www.admin.ch/gov/en/start/docum ... 77740.html

On 10 January 2020, armasuisse has issued the second request for proposal for new fighter aircraft to the government authorities where the four potential suppliers are located: Germany (Airbus Eurofighter), France (Dassault Rafale) and the USA (Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet and Lockheed-Martin F-35A). The second request for proposal is based on the analysis of the first proposal and on findings from flight, simulator and ground tests as well as audits with armed forces operating the evaluated fighter aircraft. In the second request for proposal, the companies contacted via the government authorities are requested to submit the most advantageous offer for Switzerland.

The proposal should include the following elements:

- prices for 36 and 40 aircraft, including defined logistics and weapons, as a binding starting point for the detailed negotiations with the selected candidate after the type selection
- offers for cooperation between the armed forces and the procurement authorities of Switzerland and those of the supplier country
- envisaged or already initiated offset projects

The starting point for determining the number of fighter aircraft are the requirements to cope with a situation of increased tension. In such a situation, the Swiss Air Force must be able to permanently conduct air patrols with at least four aircraft for at least four weeks in order to preserve air sovereignty, prevent unauthorised use and violations of Swiss air space and thus contribute to keep Switzerland out of armed conflict. In addition, the Swiss Air Force will use the new fighter aircraft for air policing around the clock, and, in case of armed attack, defend the air space for a limited period of time and support the ground forces.

New extended-range ground-based air defence system

On 10 January 2020, armasuisse has also issued the second request for proposal to the government authorities where the two potential suppliers of new extended-range ground-based air defence systems are located: France (Eurosam SAMP/T) and the United States of America (Raytheon Patriot). As with the fighter aircraft, the second request for proposal is based on the analysis of the first proposal, on the findings of sensor tests in Switzerland and audits of armed forces operating the evaluated systems. In the second request for proposal, the manufacturers contacted via the government authorities are requested to submit the most advantageous proposal for Switzerland.

The proposal should include the following elements:

- price for extended-range ground-based defence systems capable of covering at least 15,000 km2, including defined logistics and weapons, as a binding starting point for the detailed negotiations with the selected candidate after the type selection
- offers for cooperation between the armed forces and the procurement authorities of Switzerland and those of the supplier country
- envisaged or already initiated offset projects

Next steps in the Air2030 programme

The document "Requirements for the procurement of a new combat aircraft and a new extended-range ground-based air defence system" of 23 March 2018 has been updated. The adjustments concern mainly the offset obligations and the allocation of the financial volume. Concerning Bodluv GR, RUAG MRO Switzerland is designated as the centre for maintenance, overhaul and repair; and the candidates' capabilities to counter ballistic missiles are to be clarified.

The overall utility of each system will be determined using the information from the second proposal and the findings from the various testing activities. A comparison of overall utility with the costs and the risks will take place only after an expected referendum has taken place. The results, together with a comprehensive risk analysis, will feed into the evaluation report, where the overall utility of the new fighter aircraft and the new extended-range ground-based air defence system will be set against the costs of procurement and 30 years of operation. Based on the evaluation report, the Head of the DDPS (the Swiss Minister of Defence) will be presented with a recommendation for the most suitable fighter aircraft and extended-range ground-based air defence system for Switzerland. The final type selection will be taken by the Federal Council.


Meanwhile, I found this piece of information interesting:

Swiss TIGERs for the US Navy
https://euro-sd.com/2019/06/articles/13 ... d-attempt/

For the next couple of years, the Swiss Air Force will fly a total of 22 F-5E and four F-5F two-seaters, down from a peak of 98 and 12 in 1981. Almost all of them have become the target of a unique item in the US DoD’s FY2020 budget as the US Navy wants to acquire another 22 F-5E/Fs from Switzerland to fulfil so-called ‘fleet adversary support duties.’ The 44 F-5N/Fs that are currently flying as ‘aggressors’ with two US Navy and one Marine adversary squadrons are also from surplus Swiss Air Force stocks. However, delivery and refurbishment of those jets took place between May 2003 and November 2007 and with the fleet continuing to age, demand for its services continues to rise. Although some of this demand is being offset by employing private ‘Red Air’ contractors like ATAC or ‘Draken Intl.’ for adversary support duties, the Navy will still have to shore up its F-5 force unless it plans to retire the type entirely. Currently, the F-5 – and in particular the Swiss ones because they are very well maintained – still are a sounding economic solution for a range of threat presentations. However, theUS Navy will still have to wait a little until the Swiss have procured new aircraft.


And also a promo vid of SAMP/T deploying from France to Switzerland:


Swiss tender is interesting because they are choosing a package of fighters and GBAD (apparently David's Sling was a third option for GBAD but was eliminated). Because of Finnish tender we know that 6 billion for 40 aircraft is well within the F-35A price range, meaning they can also cram the desired logistics and support into that number. It seems LM is also in a better position because they make a significant contribution to Patriot system (unlike Dassault in SAMP/T), which is also a stronger candidate because of proven (unlike promised for Aster) HTK capability and real-world engagement data. Still i think Rafale is the other runner up, Super-Duper and Typhoon will, IMO, score lower on the cards. I also found it interesting that USN may be interested in buying even more Swiss F-5s, which ticks the box for cooperation and "envisaged or already initiated offset projects". Just imagine exchanging your old Tigers for Panthers with a slight chance of monetary gain :)
Offline

hornetfinn

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3002
  • Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
  • Location: Finland

Unread post29 Jan 2020, 14:49

Interesting how Finnish and Swiss acquisition plans are so similar. Finland is also going to procure long range/high altitude GBAD system to be choses within about two years. In Finland it's separate from our HX program for new fighter aircraft though. Of course we currently have NASAMS 2 which could be given some high altitude coverage with ESSM or AMRAAM-ER missiles. That'd be cheapest option, but likely also the least capable. Swiss idea of combining the GBAD and fighter acquisitions is definitely interesting one.
Offline
User avatar

ricnunes

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2564
  • Joined: 02 Mar 2017, 14:29

Unread post29 Jan 2020, 17:05

hythelday wrote:Swiss TIGERs for the US Navy
https://euro-sd.com/2019/06/articles/13 ... d-attempt/

For the next couple of years, the Swiss Air Force will fly a total of 22 F-5E and four F-5F two-seaters, down from a peak of 98 and 12 in 1981. Almost all of them have become the target of a unique item in the US DoD’s FY2020 budget as the US Navy wants to acquire another 22 F-5E/Fs from Switzerland to fulfil so-called ‘fleet adversary support duties.’ The 44 F-5N/Fs that are currently flying as ‘aggressors’ with two US Navy and one Marine adversary squadrons are also from surplus Swiss Air Force stocks.



Well, they actually want Mig-28's :mrgreen:
“Active stealth” is what the ignorant nay sayers call ECM and pretend like it’s new.
Offline

hythelday

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 587
  • Joined: 25 Jul 2016, 12:43
  • Location: Estonia

Unread post29 Jan 2020, 17:40

hornetfinn wrote:Interesting how Finnish and Swiss acquisition plans are so similar. Finland is also going to procure long range/high altitude GBAD system to be choses within about two years. In Finland it's separate from our HX program for new fighter aircraft though. Of course we currently have NASAMS 2 which could be given some high altitude coverage with ESSM or AMRAAM-ER missiles. That'd be cheapest option, but likely also the least capable. Swiss idea of combining the GBAD and fighter acquisitions is definitely interesting one.


Instead of long range GBAD you should get an inventory of SM-6 for your new ships. Cheaper than introducing entirely new system, can be data-linked to F-35s, ready to fire even on the move and much more easy to protect if the ship is cruising somewhere in Botnia with its own point defense and EW ready.
Offline

mixelflick

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3756
  • Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:26
  • Location: Parts Unknown

Unread post29 Jan 2020, 17:47

There is just no beating the F-35 now in any fair competition. It meets all the requirements of most nations (and then some), with the possible exception of technology transfer. Although, that depends how you define it. The F-35's unit cost is cheaper, it's lifetime costs will be less (due to being so far ahead of the tech curve), the worldwide sustainment platform is only going to get better and the cost per flight hour is only coming down.

Throw in Patriot and Lockheed Martin is going to clean up in the Swiss competition - and elsewhere. Unless and until the Chinse get the J-31 rolling, it'll be the only game in town insofar as a truly stealthy, affordable and effective strike fighter is concerned.

It is increasingly clear: LM has built a better mousetrap...
Offline

magitsu

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 516
  • Joined: 12 Jun 2015, 22:12

Unread post31 Jan 2020, 10:23

hythelday wrote:
hornetfinn wrote:Interesting how Finnish and Swiss acquisition plans are so similar. Finland is also going to procure long range/high altitude GBAD system to be choses within about two years. In Finland it's separate from our HX program for new fighter aircraft though. Of course we currently have NASAMS 2 which could be given some high altitude coverage with ESSM or AMRAAM-ER missiles. That'd be cheapest option, but likely also the least capable. Swiss idea of combining the GBAD and fighter acquisitions is definitely interesting one.

Instead of long range GBAD you should get an inventory of SM-6 for your new ships. Cheaper than introducing entirely new system, can be data-linked to F-35s, ready to fire even on the move and much more easy to protect if the ship is cruising somewhere in Botnia with its own point defense and EW ready.

There's quite a bit of inland to cover instead of just the coastline. Also Lapland is basically more important to Russia than for us, because of potential threat to the Northern Fleet in Murmansk.

It doesn't really make sense to try to cover the coastline cities, the few AA assets available are mostly required for protecting the fight of the army.

It's enticing nevertheless, but also in a way would increase the risk involved when pooling so many of the available capabilities to just 4 naval units. Their outlook is already to be very overworked.

Both competitions clearly have the big picture in mind. But since they are not bundled but separate in Finland, Patriot etc. didn't find their way in unlike Growler/GlobalEye. Which implies that at least Finland won't be acquiring something as costly as Patriot. The smallest improvement would be very small indeed: AMRAAM-ER or ESSM blk 2 + new targeting radar to NASAMS. Since the corvettes already went for ESSM, either of these could provide synergies.

With the Swiss competition in mind, Finland went with "5 Volvo's instead of 2 Cadillacs" as one eccentric general described it when it took NASAMS instead of SAMP/T. But the loss of medium distance/higher ceiling ability compared to retired Buk-M1 has been a source of longing ever since. Now that will be settled in one way or another.
Offline
User avatar

lukfi

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: 16 Jan 2020, 19:41
  • Location: LKKB

Unread post31 Jan 2020, 20:44

hythelday wrote:I also found it interesting that USN may be interested in buying even more Swiss F-5s, which ticks the box for cooperation and "envisaged or already initiated offset projects".

Would this actually count among offsets? The Swiss are probably going to sell the F-5s regardless of which aircraft wins the competition.
Offline

noth

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 90
  • Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 14:16

Unread post01 Feb 2020, 04:27

The referendum on acquisition of warplanes seems set for September 2020 (usually the last Sunday of September). Nothing will be announced on aircraft selection till 2021, same for the air defence package.
Previous

Return to Program and politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests