MQ-25 US Navy Stingray Program

Sub-scale and Full-Scale Aerial Targets and RPAs - Remotely-Piloted Aircraft
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Corsair1963

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 5697
  • Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14

Unread post03 Sep 2018, 09:52

Not really surprising but disappointing nonetheless. As the Lockheed Martin MQ-25A had far more potential..... "IMHO" :bang:


MQ-25-unmanned-tanker.png
Offline

hornetfinn

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2811
  • Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
  • Location: Finland

Unread post03 Sep 2018, 11:31

hythelday wrote:
hornetfinn wrote: It would also be interesting to develop a cargo variant to replace C-2 Greyhound.


How will that thing deliver a F135? :shock:


I was thinking slightly larger and possibly more powerful variant for cargo ops but with otherwise similar layout. Of course USN has Ospreys for that now, but maybe in the future they could use MQ-25 type UAS for that role.
Offline

blain

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 157
  • Joined: 04 Apr 2017, 22:52

Unread post04 Sep 2018, 20:29

noth wrote:So with 72 to be ordered, how many per CAW would you think they'd assigned?


I think previously they mentioned six, which isn't that much when you consider at least 1 will need to support cyclic ops.
Offline

Corsair1963

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 5697
  • Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14

Unread post05 Sep 2018, 02:28

blain wrote:
noth wrote:So with 72 to be ordered, how many per CAW would you think they'd assigned?


I think previously they mentioned six, which isn't that much when you consider at least 1 will need to support cyclic ops.



Well, the MQ-25's don't have pilots and can be turned around rather quickly. So, considering only half our Carriers are ever deployed at a single time. (usually less) Means we should have more than enough Tankers to go around...
Previous

Return to Drones

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 0 guests