Chinese J-20 may be using F-117 tech

Military aircraft - Post cold war aircraft, including for example B-2, Gripen, F-18E/F Super Hornet, Rafale, and Typhoon.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

LinkF16SimDude

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2430
  • Joined: 31 Jan 2004, 19:18
  • Location: SW Tenn.

Unread post24 Jan 2011, 00:25

Why am I not surprised. :roll:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ja ... technology

So instead of developing their OWN stealth tech from scratch, they reverse-engineered our near 30-year old stuff...maybe (Nighthawk debuted in '83, BTW). From a stealth standpoint only and disregarding all that breathless "significant threat to American air superiority" noise, where then does that puts this thing on the parity scale with the Raptor?

Discuss.... :wink:
Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
Offline

yakuza

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 205
  • Joined: 08 Nov 2008, 18:17

Unread post24 Jan 2011, 01:04

stealth tech was copied(better say stoled) from Germany,like missile tech and other stuff...russians did the same thing,so it´s not really exclusiv to US.
spying is a common practice,most developped nations are guilty of stealing technology from eachother so why condemn China only?

why should China reinvent the wheel?
just my :2c:
Offline

fiskerwad

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 753
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2004, 19:43
  • Location: 76101

Unread post24 Jan 2011, 03:40

I prefer that they are always stealing our technology, it means while they are figuring out how it works, we (USA) are working on the next level. As I told a foreign student once, we taught you everything YOU know, we did not teach you everything that WE know.
fisk
Offline

dragorv

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 98
  • Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 03:47
  • Location: East Coast, USA

Unread post25 Jan 2011, 18:43

Seems like they might not have only used F-117 tech.... *sigh*

http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2011/ ... ge-012411/
Offline

milosh

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 277
  • Joined: 27 Feb 2008, 23:40
  • Location: Serbia, Belgrade

Unread post14 Feb 2011, 00:25

LinkF16SimDude wrote:Why am I not surprised. :roll:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ja ... technology



This text is :roll:
Offline

geogen

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2945
  • Joined: 11 Mar 2008, 15:28
  • Location: 45 km offshore, New England

Unread post14 Feb 2011, 04:18

J-20's tech, regardless of where it comes from, is pretty much irrelevant today and for at least 7-10 yrs imho. No offense to anyone. PLAF's much more superior achievements and advances in the near-term however have come in the form of J-10B and J-11/15 class threats to the region. What 35 yr old tech might be related to J-20 in 10 yrs from now really shouldn't be an issue at imho. Respects to all.
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
Offline

irshlad321

Newbie

Newbie

  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: 27 Feb 2011, 01:32

Unread post16 Apr 2011, 23:32

J-20 to me is an attempt by RAC MiG (with their MiG 1.44 tech) and the PLAF (with their never-ending lust to be comparable to the USAF) to both get on the fifth generation stage.
:pint:

Return to Modern Military Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests