F-35B LOADed Graphic STOVL Mode

Discuss photos, special paintschemes and serial numbers of the F-35
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 21406
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 13:48

Attachments
F-35BgraphicLOADed-.jpg
RAN FAA A4G Skyhawk 1970s: https://www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ AND https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/
Offline
User avatar

popcorn

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 7422
  • Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 14:14

Pretty much a SRVL configuration.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
Offline

eloise

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1470
  • Joined: 27 Mar 2015, 16:05

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 14:21

i dont think it can hover with that much weapons
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 21406
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 14:22

'eloise' posted as I typed.... Hover no - SRVL depends :mrgreen: 'Probably' :mrgreen: a bit heavy for that hovering - the SRVL supposedly gives an extra 2K to 4K pounds extra landing weight on top of the full internal load (with fuel reserves for a VL etc.). Depends how much dem bombs weigh etc AND... what the final story is about the extra brungback SRVL gives. I guess.
RAN FAA A4G Skyhawk 1970s: https://www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ AND https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/
Offline

sdkf251

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 98
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2014, 11:02

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 14:35

I think Kitty Hawk is a brand of Chinese scale model maker. So could this be a possible scale model of the F-35B of Kitty Hawk? In any case, nice drawing though.

Also noticed the canopy is open. Is this to assist in throwing you wallet ..... :mrgreen:
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 21406
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 14:37

:mrgreen: "...Also noticed the canopy is open. Is this to assist in throwing you wallet." And increases airflow to the hyperventilating pilot (concerned about the configuration). :mrgreen:
RAN FAA A4G Skyhawk 1970s: https://www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ AND https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/
Offline

SnakeHandler

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 718
  • Joined: 01 Jul 2007, 18:22

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 16:15

Assuming a 30K empty weight that only leaves 10K in excess thrust. About 2K for external racks, Aim-9s, and -120s leaves 8K worth of bombs at the most.
Online

SpudmanWP

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 7756
  • Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
  • Location: California

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 17:33

WHAT?????

No Gun Pod? :roll:
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 21406
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 17:50

'snakewhisperer' WotNo Fuel? Guys gotta land ya'know.
RAN FAA A4G Skyhawk 1970s: https://www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ AND https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/
Offline
User avatar

blindpilot

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1128
  • Joined: 01 Mar 2013, 18:21
  • Location: Colorado

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 20:05

spazsinbad wrote:'snakewhisperer' WotNo Fuel? Guys gotta land ya'know.


Hey, I once landed at LAX (original destination March AFB) with fuel in the pipes after a Pacific crossing with chicks. Fuel is overrated, you don't need much. ... Hmm actually thinking back :( :drool: now that I remember that ...yeah maybe a little fuel for landing is a good plan ... :D :D

BP
Offline

SnakeHandler

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 718
  • Joined: 01 Jul 2007, 18:22

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 21:37

spazsinbad wrote:'snakewhisperer' WotNo Fuel? Guys gotta land ya'know.



With an empty weight of 29.1K-ish I allowed for 900 pounds at landing.
Offline

basher54321

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1519
  • Joined: 02 Feb 2014, 15:43

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 21:47

SnakeHandler wrote:With an empty weight of 29.1K-ish I allowed for 900 pounds at landing.


The empty for the B isn't :P
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 21406
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post26 Sep 2015, 21:52

Some 'facts' are known but even those in dispute. I prefer to use weights and measures from LM Fast Facts PDF and work from there: https://www.f35.com/assets/uploads/down ... 3q2015.pdf

The reason why SRVL bring back extra weight is variable is because of the variable way the WOD, sea state and other variables including potential bringback weight impact the way the SRVL is calculated. I can only point to how that is calculated without having access to the figures and of course this is under test and won't be verified until UK F-35B test ops from actual CVF sometime in 2018. And SRVLs may never be carried out for whatever reason.

The unknowns will include the amount of fuel required for minimum to land on with in VL/SRVL circumstances. This is a bunch of words without numbers so one has to guess.

There is a thread with the 'quicksilver' comment about the video of USMC F-35Bs FCLPing in 90deg F heat at YUMA telling the LSO in effect they will have approx. 6,500lbs of fuel in the hover. Now they could have more than that also because we do not know if these Bees have carried out a VL already - guessing is a fun game. I await the F-35B NATOPS with interest. :mrgreen:

For VL: "3,000 lbs of weapons + STOVL Bringback fuel (sufficient for 2 x IFR passes with STOVL reserve)"
http://dodreports.com/pdf/ada520417.pdf

Also the BOWMAN PDF has similar info about what to have for a VL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_download-id-14791.html
Attachments
f-35fast_facts3q2015.pdf
(67.41 KiB) Downloaded 491 times
RAN FAA A4G Skyhawk 1970s: https://www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ AND https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/
Offline
User avatar

count_to_10

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3246
  • Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:38

Unread post27 Sep 2015, 00:35

blindpilot wrote:
spazsinbad wrote:'snakewhisperer' WotNo Fuel? Guys gotta land ya'know.


Hey, I once landed at LAX (original destination March AFB) with fuel in the pipes after a Pacific crossing with chicks. Fuel is overrated, you don't need much. ... Hmm actually thinking back :( :drool: now that I remember that ...yeah maybe a little fuel for landing is a good plan ... :D :D

BP

Can the airliners even land in the runway length they have without their thrust reversers?
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.

Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.
Offline

sprstdlyscottsmn

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3559
  • Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
  • Location: Phoenix, Az

Unread post27 Sep 2015, 02:55

count_to_10 wrote:Can the airliners even land in the runway length they have without their thrust reversers?

Yes, those are mainly to preserve brakes and tires.
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer

Return to F-35 Spotting & Photography

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest