F-35 and chase plane photos

Discuss photos, special paintschemes and serial numbers of the F-35
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 407
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 02:03

by avon1944 » 08 Sep 2009, 01:31

Does any one know of any photos showing the F-35 with a chase plane without and external stores? I would like to show some anti-F-35 flamers that the F-35 can operate as well as the chase planes without the chase plane being loaded down.


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 09 Sep 2009, 01:07

The cleanest I have seen is a F-16 with a single centerline pod.
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5999
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
Location: Nashua NH USA

by sprstdlyscottsmn » 09 Sep 2009, 02:43

which enganges the AB to keep up with a loaded F-35 in a mil power climb.
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
-PFD Systems Engineer
-PATRIOT Systems Engineer


F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator
 
Posts: 1892
Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:47

by Scorpion1alpha » 13 Sep 2009, 02:19

Adrian,

I don't think you'll find a photo of a chase F-16 or F-18 without some sort of extra gas bag(s) with the F-35 at this time. There is such a discrepancy between the Viper and Hornet compared to the F-35 in terms of gas that they really need it otherwise they won't be able to "hang" with F-35 as long.

Same thing when F-16s or F-15s chase the F-22. They won't have any hope to "hang" with the Raptor for very long unless they have the extra gas. The only time where you'll really see a clean Viper or Eagle "playing" with the F-22 is when they're doing OT work where it's desirable for the F-15s and F-16s to be at their most optimal aerodynamic configuration.

Obviously, the F-35 isn't in that phase of testing yet. When that time comes, you can bet that a portion of the F-35 tests will be evaluated against our very best Viper and Eagle jocks flying their best aircraft and game.
I'm watching...


Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 407
Joined: 24 Nov 2004, 02:03

by avon1944 » 18 Sep 2009, 06:02

Thank you guys for your comments. -Adrian


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: 30 Oct 2006, 04:31

by VarkVet » 18 Sep 2009, 21:11

Don’t forget that Raptor can be used as a Safety Chase as well! … and I bet she’s dying for some rookie a$$ as a target!

Or should I say more competition?
8)
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2322
Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 05:03
Location: Under an engine somewhere.

by That_Engine_Guy » 19 Sep 2009, 05:25

VarkVet wrote:Don’t forget that Raptor can be used as a Safety Chase as well! … and I bet she’s dying for some rookie a$$ as a target!

Or should I say more competition?
8)


Oh no... :nono:

That might just prove that the F-22 is better at AA than the F-35, and we wouldn't want the administration or congress appear to be wrong... :doh:

Actual real-world data, performance, and results like that are strictly prohibited when politicians are making procurement decisions for the military; esp when the military is being 'told what they need' for success. :roll:

Remember the initial F-14/F-15 days when they weren't allowed to 'play' together? Back then it was the USN/USAF trying to keep both their respective programs alive.

Keep 'em flyin' :thumb:
TEG
[Airplanes are] near perfect, all they lack is the ability to forgive.
— Richard Collins


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 21 Sep 2009, 21:34

I found it :)

At the 6:10 mark in this Youtube clip

Image
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 173
Joined: 13 May 2009, 22:38

by f35phixer » 21 Sep 2009, 23:02

VarkVet wrote:Don’t forget that Raptor can be used as a Safety Chase as well! … and I bet she’s dying for some rookie a$$ as a target!

Or should I say more competition?
8)


I would think F-22 would never be used for safety chase. MTRFB costs of them vise an F-16/15 for AF is probably the same for us Navy guys, F-18E/F cost are prohibitive to budget. We use a-d.


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 111
Joined: 07 Nov 2008, 12:56

by cobzz » 22 Sep 2009, 15:29

SpudmanWP wrote:I found it :)

At the 6:10 mark in this Youtube clip

Image

What am I supposed to be looking at here?


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 23 Sep 2009, 00:02

The post that started this tread asked:

Does any one know of any photos showing the F-35 with a chase plane without and external stores?


As you can see, the chase F-16 in the above picture is totally naked of all external stores, ie no fuel tanks.


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 546
Joined: 06 Oct 2005, 12:43
Location: Dallas, Texas

by Lightndattic » 23 Sep 2009, 14:12

SpudmanWP wrote:The post that started this tread asked:

Does any one know of any photos showing the F-35 with a chase plane without and external stores?


As you can see, the chase F-16 in the above picture is totally naked of all external stores, ie no fuel tanks.


Probably because that F-35 flight was to test the fuel dump system, so it was likely a short one.


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5999
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
Location: Nashua NH USA

by sprstdlyscottsmn » 26 Sep 2009, 15:23

Bah, the F-35 can dump half its internal fuel and still have more than an F-16 with a gas bag fresh from the tanker. your right though, prolly under two hours long and at moderate speeds.
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
-PFD Systems Engineer
-PATRIOT Systems Engineer



Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests