Belgium considers Lockheed F-35 to replace F-16s

Program progress, politics, orders, and speculation
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

ricnunes

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 162
  • Joined: 02 Mar 2017, 14:29

Unread post27 Mar 2017, 21:36

Not to mention that one of the threats that the new/future Belgium fighter is "expected to face" is the S-400 (NATO Name: SA-21 Growler) - See page 229.
There isn't any available fighter aircraft in the market (which will be proposed to Belgium) today or in the near future capable of facing the S-400 outside the F-35 (at least without suffering some "prohibitive loses"). :wink:
Offline
User avatar

XanderCrews

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 4647
  • Joined: 16 Oct 2012, 19:42

Unread post28 Mar 2017, 15:33

Dragon029 wrote:Looking at the terminology they're using, the relative weightings and the scenarios, it seems like the F-35 has this one in the bag; there seems to be a big emphasis on information gathering / ISR, the ability to fuse data, search and destroy, work in a joint environment, have good survivability, etc.


Yep. Was only a few pages in and saw the emphasis on ISR and jointNess. Pretty obvious I would think
Choose Crews
Offline
User avatar

neptune

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2097
  • Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 00:03
  • Location: Houston

Unread post20 Apr 2017, 05:41

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... on-436354/

Boeing will not compete its SBug to replace Belgium’s fleet of F-16s

Boeing will not compete its F/A-18 Super Hornet to replace Belgium’s fleet of Lockheed Martin F-16s, the company informed the nation's government this week. In a statement, the airframer says it will not participate in a 19 April bidders' conference, nor respond to Brussels' request for proposals for the new fighter. “We regret that after reviewing the request we do not see an opportunity to compete on a truly level playing field with the...F/A-18 Super Hornet,” Boeing says. “This decision allows Boeing to concentrate its efforts and resources on supporting our global customers, securing new orders and investing in technology and systems required to meet the threats of today and tomorrow. Where there is a full and open competition we look forward to bringing the full depth and breadth of Boeing to our offer.”

Belgium’s recapitalization effort is expected to replace its 59 F-16A/Bs with 34 new fighters, with a budget of up to €3.6 billion ($4 billion), FlightGlobal has previously reported. Boeing’s American rival, Lockheed Martin, remains in the competition with its F-35. Other candidates include the Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon and Saab Gripen E. Over the past year, Boeing has chalked up a number of coups for its tactical fighter business, from a Canadian Super Hornet purchase to a renewed interest in the aircraft from US President Donald Trump, as well as orders from Kuwait and Qatar. However, interest from Europe appears to be waning. After losing Denmark’s fighter competition in 2016 to the F-35A, Boeing issued a legal challenge against the Danish defense ministry arguing that the government executed a “flawed” evaluation process. On 15 September 2016, Boeing submitted a request for insight seeking documents and information on the fighter decision. "Since then, the ministry has shared only a small fraction of the documents that Boeing is entitled to review, and has not provided a complete list of all its documents and information as required by law," Boeing says. Boeing filed a legal challenge on 2 March, fighting the failure to release the documents; that court hearing is still pending. Meanwhile, Boeing sees other opportunities from fighter contests being held by Finland and Switzerland.
:P
Offline

hornetfinn

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1921
  • Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
  • Location: Finland

Unread post20 Apr 2017, 10:48

Where there is a full and open competition we look forward to bringing the full depth and breadth of Boeing to our offer.


Just like in Canada... :roll:
Offline

mixelflick

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1411
  • Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:26
  • Location: Parts Unknown

Unread post20 Apr 2017, 15:35

This business of suing countries after losing, not making the cut etc seems to me to be short sighted. If you're a country evaluating strike fighters, why would you entertain Boeing's bid (be that the F-18 SH or F-15), only to open yourself up to litigation?

Hey Boeing: How about you develop a superior product?
Offline
User avatar

botsing

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 335
  • Joined: 05 Dec 2015, 18:09
  • Location: The Netherlands

Unread post20 Apr 2017, 17:26

mixelflick wrote:This business of suing countries after losing, not making the cut etc seems to me to be short sighted.

As a country I would put a big legal team at work to add a section to the Request for Proposal where it clearly states that the country cannot be sued in anyway by the contenders or their partners over it (with all the legal mumble jumble).

Prevention is better than cure.
"Those who know don’t talk. Those who talk don’t know"
Offline
User avatar

popcorn

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 6529
  • Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

Unread post21 Apr 2017, 00:13

Take a cue from F1. You can protest the outcome of a race but if you lose you pay a hefty fine. :devil:
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
Previous

Return to Program and politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 11 guests