F-35 program updates

Program progress, politics, orders, and speculation
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

SpudmanWP

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 6966
  • Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
  • Location: California

Unread post13 Oct 2017, 20:22

white_lightning35 wrote:for there are many different countries with many different systems that suit them.


How many have a "Bernie"? :mrgreen:
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
Offline
User avatar

krorvik

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 518
  • Joined: 12 Sep 2015, 15:26

Unread post13 Oct 2017, 21:13

Hehe. I live in a single payer health care system. It works mate.

That's all from me as far as that is concerned ;)
Offline

SpudmanWP

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 6966
  • Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
  • Location: California

Unread post13 Oct 2017, 21:24

The main problem with single payer in the US would be that people would expect to get the historically high US level of care for free. To give you an idea of what that would cost, the State of California estimated that it would cost 4 times the current Calif Budget to implement Sp for the state. Now expand that to the entire nation. Where is the money supposed to come from?
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
Offline
User avatar

krorvik

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 518
  • Joined: 12 Sep 2015, 15:26

Unread post13 Oct 2017, 21:47

I wouldn't *dare* to try to have opinions on what may or may not work in the US....
Offline

white_lightning35

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 247
  • Joined: 18 Sep 2016, 03:07

Unread post13 Oct 2017, 22:38

krorvik wrote:I wouldn't *dare* to try to have opinions on what may or may not work in the US....


I bet you do... :mrgreen: and I think your system works very well for your country.( As far as I know. Norway seems to have lots of money to spend regardless of if it is inefficient or not.) As I alluded to in my previous post, many people from many different countries of similar development, similar enough to inevitably elicit comparison, love to say that their own ways are the best and need to be implemented everywhere. There are others like you who, very admirably, do not feel the need to tout their superiority, even if they believe they are superior.

I just think that we should all realize that things are different in other places, and that starting arguments about the merits of everyone's respective healthcare systems will not reflect well upon this aviation forum.
Offline

white_lightning35

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 247
  • Joined: 18 Sep 2016, 03:07

Unread post13 Oct 2017, 22:49

Oh, and opinions are like &$$#oles: everyone's got one.

Unless.....

You're saying you're THE SUPREME LEADER!
Attachments
i-heard-he-doesnt-pee-or-poo-he-works-so-2556369.png
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 19371
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post25 Oct 2017, 03:24

Lockheed F-35 deliveries lag in third quarter
24 Oct 2017 Leigh Giangreco

"After nine months of production, Lockheed Martin’s F-35 line is still lagging, according to the latest company earnings report. Lockheed delivered 15 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters at the end of September, according to its third quarter 2017 earnings released this week. That batch brings Lockheed’s total F-35 deliveries to 44 this year, far away from the Lockheed's original goal of 66 jet deliveries by the end of 2017.

Lockheed delivered 14 jets in the second quarter of this year and 15 in the previous quarter, setting a nine-month average of almost three deliveries a month. To meet the 2017 delivery goal, Lockheed needs to average 5.5 deliveries a month for the full year.

While the company often boosts its deliveries in the fourth quarter, the year-end goal would set an ambitious production pace for the next two months. In April, a Pentagon contract management agency forecast Lockheed’s year-end delivery at 57 jets, based on the lower than expected delivery rates in prior years.

Lockheed's delivery target in 2016 was set at 53 F-35s, but the company's globally distributed production system managed to hand over only 46....

...Despite the lagging deliveries so far this year, Lockheed executives struck an optimistic tone during a 24 October earnings call, quoting the low-rate initial production lot 11 contract award from this summer. Lot 11 will deliver another 141 jets, including US and foreign orders."

Source: https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... er-442466/
RAN FAA A4G Skyhawk 1970s: https://www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ AND https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/
Offline

sunstersun

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 85
  • Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 06:50

Unread post25 Oct 2017, 08:23

c'mon lockheed, we need dat good PR
Online

hornetfinn

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2159
  • Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
  • Location: Finland

Unread post25 Oct 2017, 11:06

I love the fact that individual LOW Rate initial Production lots of F-35 are larger than the total production numbers for many fighter aircraft... Even these laggard delivery numbers per month are several times larger than many other fighter aircraft are being delivered. Of course these production issues need to be sorted out and I think they will.
Offline
User avatar

ricnunes

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 775
  • Joined: 02 Mar 2017, 14:29

Unread post18 Nov 2017, 19:23

SpudmanWP wrote:
krorvik wrote:Funds are never unlilmited.

Tell that to a Bernie supporter or anyone pushing for single payer healthcare.


Wasn't Bernie the only or among the few "top" US politicians (and in this case a Senator) that openly defended the F-35 program?
I would say that alone is a huge improvement over for example McCain or even Trump.

About healthcare or universal healthcare I have the same/similar opinion as krorvik (and I echo what he said) but more I won't say... :wink:
Offline
User avatar

rheonomic

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 421
  • Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 03:44
  • Location: US

Unread post19 Nov 2017, 03:05

...
Last edited by rheonomic on 19 Nov 2017, 03:35, edited 1 time in total.
u = (CB)⁻¹(cvdt_des - CAx)
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 19371
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post19 Nov 2017, 03:23

COME ON! This thread is about???? F-35 PROGRAM UPDATES let us keep it that way please - politics goes elsewhere.
RAN FAA A4G Skyhawk 1970s: https://www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ AND https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/
Offline
User avatar

Dragon029

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1086
  • Joined: 22 Dec 2014, 07:13

Unread post21 Nov 2017, 00:06

https://insidedefense.com/inside-navy/d ... next-month

Inside the Navy - November 20, 2017
DAB to consider new F-35 Block 4 plan next month
November 17, 2017 |
Courtney Albon Lee Hudson

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program expects to meet with Pentagon leadership in early December for approval of a new plan that will allow it to continuously develop software capabilities following completion of the post-system development and demonstration phase.

F-35 Program Executive Officer Vice Adm. Mat Winter told reporters in September he expected that approval to come in October.

Air Force Brig. Gen. Eric Fick, F-35 program deputy, told Inside Defense Nov. 15 that while the program expects approval for its new post-SDD strategy, the upcoming Defense Acquisition Board meeting is not solely focused on Block 4 follow-on modernization. It is part of the program's annual update with Pentagon acquisition executive Ellen Lord.

"It's giving her that look across the entire program, laying out the process that we intend to follow as we march forward in modernizing," he said.

The JPO will present a cost estimate for Block 4 during the DAB meeting, but an updated figure is being finalized as part of the fiscal year 2019 budget process, Fick said.

Inside Defense first reported in September the joint program office was adapting its strategy for post-SDD and follow-on modernization, a move that could change the way it develops and delivers new software capabilities. The new strategy would establish a bridge period between delivery of the final version of Block 3F software the program plans to release during development and the start of Block 4 follow-on modernization.

The program expects to deliver all Block 3F capabilities in "early 2018," Fick said. However, the software will have a number of known deficiencies that will not be addressed by the close of SDD next year. The bridge phase would allow the program time to address those deficiencies and incorporate fixes discovered during initial operational test and evaluation, which is slated to start early next year.

Congress has been waiting for months on the JPO to provide a detailed plan for Block 4. Under the Fiscal Year 2017 National Defense Authorization Act, the report was due in March.

In the FY-18 defense policy bill, which passed the House and Senate this week, lawmakers fence off 75 percent of Block 4 funding until the program provides the report, which likely won't be delivered until after the Pentagon approves the plan. -- Courtney Albon and Lee Hudson
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 19371
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post30 Nov 2017, 15:05

F-35 Weapons Capability Passes Key Test Milestone
10 Nov 2017 Jeff Babione

"As we near completion of the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) phase of the program, our team checked
off another key milestone recently with completion of Weapon Delivery Accuracy (WDA) testing at China Lake, California.
In a rigorous testing environment encompassing 42 WDAs, we certified the F-35 for the AIM-120, AIM-9X, ASRAAM, Paveway IV, SDB, GBU-12, GBU-31, JDAM, and JSOW...."

Source: https://a855196877272cb14560-2a4fa819a6 ... _10_17.pdf (264Kb)
RAN FAA A4G Skyhawk 1970s: https://www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ AND https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/
Previous

Return to Program and politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Corsair1963 and 11 guests