PW to wrap up SDD F135 in July (15 yrs.)

All about the Pratt & Whitney F135 and the (cancelled) General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

neptune

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2762
  • Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 00:03
  • Location: Houston

Unread post29 Apr 2016, 22:27

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pw-wrapping-up-f135-engine-development-424810/

P&W wrapping up F135 engine development
 
29 April, 2016
BY: James Drew
Washington DC

Pratt & Whitney expects to wrap up system development and demonstration (SDD) of the F135 propulsion system for the F-35 Lightning II in July after 15 years of work, but the company will remain engaged with the wider Joint Strike Fighter flight test effort which runs until late 2017. The P&W's head of military engines Bennett Croswell tells Flightglobal that the F135 team is also about 85% of the way through correcting an engine fault inherent in 180 early-model units and caused one aircraft to catch fire on the runway at Eglin AFB, Florida in June 2014. The problem was traced to hard rubbing in the engine’s compressor section. The incident temporarily grounded the F-35 fleet and prevented the US Marine Corps F-35B from debuting at the Farnborough Air Show. “I feel very confident we’re going to get across the ditch this time,” Croswell says.

Now that development is wrapping up, Croswell is looking to an F135 engine component improvement program that receives $33 million per year in the US Air Force’s budget as well as new science and technology initiatives as vehicles for developing block upgrades for the 43,000lb-thrust afterburning turbofan. The F135 represents the present and the future of P&W’s military engines business, says Croswell, and new developments will reduce fuel burn, increase thrust and lower the overall life cycle cost. The F135 will evolve in increments like the F100, of which P&W delivered 7,000 over 40 years and 3,900 remain in service today. Initial changes will be software related, Croswell says, with no significant components changes required. The next step up will come via the US Navy’s Fuel Burn Reduction program, which aims to cut F135 fuel consumption by 4% by about 2020.

P&W is also engaged in the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Adaptive Engine Technology Development (AETD) project that is developing adaptive cycle engines with a third bypass stream. The ultimate goal is an engine 25% better fuel efficiency than today’s engines and 10% greater thrust. P&W and GE Aviation have moved their competing designs from AETD through to the preliminary design review phase and are conducting fan and core demonstrations this year. The two American engine manufacturers expect follow-on contracts, each worth up to $1 billion, for the Adaptive Engine Transition Program (AETP) by mid-year. The AETP demonstration phase runs through budget year 2021, with engine performance and durability tests expected in 2019 and 2020. The best engine is likely to power the next Air Force and Navy fighter platforms.

A P&W engine has been chosen to power the still-classified Northrop Grumman B-21 long-range strategic bomber, but the US Air Force won't confirm if it's some derivative of the F135. Croswell also won't discuss the next-generation heavy ordnance carrier, but says planned improvements to the F135 will support current F-35 operations and help P&W win new business in the future, perhaps even re-engining contracts.

“When you look at when next-generation will be fielded, you need to back it up and start now,” says Croswell. “We’ll expand on variable cycle features. We’re doing an AETD/AETP engine with a variable cycle fan and we’re looking at things like a variable cycle core as well. "That’ll be the foundation for what we do in next-gen. We’ll do some significant durability testing, go to altitude and test the engine across the full envelope.” The F135 is derived from the F119-100 turbofan that powers the F-22 Raptor and was installed on the Lockheed X-35 and Boeing X-32 JSF prototypes. Since F-35 development began in October 2001, P&W has delivered 270 F135s, including the Rolls-Royce Lift Fan-equipped -600 version for the F-35B – the only supersonic short takeoff, vertical landing combat aircraft. This month, the company finalized a contract for 66 Lot 9 engines under $1 billion deal and is should receive funding for the next 100 Lot 10 units soon. P&W recently received funding for Lot 11 long-lead parts as aircraft production ramps up in Texas, Italy and Japan.

:)
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 19640
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post29 Apr 2016, 22:52

That is weird eh - posting the same article sixteen minutes later? viewtopic.php?f=56&t=41233&p=332926#p332926
RAN FAA A4G Skyhawk 1970s: https://www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ AND https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/
Offline

bring_it_on

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 908
  • Joined: 30 Apr 2014, 14:32

Unread post13 Jul 2016, 02:11

F135 Development Wrapping Up


Farnborough, UK—After 15 years, Pratt & Whitney is about to complete System Design and Demonstration of the F135 engine, which powers the F-35 family of fighters, company military engines president Bennett Croswell said Tuesday. "Development ends this month … with fewer than [10] issues outstanding after fulfilling 350 propulsion requirements and more than 26,000 components," he said in an interview with Air Force Magazine. "We will continue to support" F-35 flight testing under a separate contract through January, he said. Most of the outstanding issues are "a matter of timing," meaning they can't be closed out until the F135 is assessed "at maturity," which in some cases will be 2020. The required mission readiness rate at that point will be "threshhold 90 percent and goal 94 percent," he said, but the engine is already running at about a mission readiness rate of 95-96 percent, so no trouble is expected even though that criterion will be considered "open" until the maturity point.

The F135 is also supposed to be the same price as the F119 engine, which powers the F-22 fighter and was the basis of the F135, at the 300th engine delivered, even though it's 1,500 pounds heavier and delivers 20 percent more thrust. Croswell said Pratt is on track to make that goal, having delivered 288 F135 engines so far. In Lot 9 and Lot 10, Pratt was able to reduce the F135 cost by 3.4 percent for the conventional take off version and 6.4 percent for the short takeoff/vertical landing version. The company is joining the Lockheed Martin-led "blueprint for affordability" and will invest in further cost reductions through design, process, or materials improvements. The company is also pushing to reduce sustainment costs by tapping the world market and using partner facilities overseas for overhaul and maintenance, Croswell said.
Offline
User avatar

popcorn

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 6972
  • Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

Unread post13 Jul 2016, 04:03

The P&W's head of military engines Bennett Croswell tells Flightglobal that the F135 team is also about 85% of the way through correcting an engine fault inherent in 180 early-model units and caused one aircraft to catch fire ...

I wonder what he remaining 15% remedial work covers?
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
Offline
User avatar

Dragon029

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1105
  • Joined: 22 Dec 2014, 07:13

Unread post13 Jul 2016, 04:26

I think that's the same figure from a month or two ago - it referred to the percentage of how many F135 engines have received the IBR rub strip modification, so that 15% figure either refers to the percentage of engines that exist that haven't yet gone into a depot / plant for the modification, or it refers to the percentage of F-35's that haven't had the engine fix applied.
Last edited by Dragon029 on 13 Jul 2016, 06:09, edited 1 time in total.
Offline
User avatar

popcorn

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 6972
  • Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

Unread post13 Jul 2016, 05:29

Dragon029 wrote:I think that's the same figure from a month or two ago - it refers to the percentage of how many F135 engines have received the IBR rub strip modification, so that 15% figure either refers to the percentage of engines that exist that haven't yet gone into a depot / plant for the modification, or it refers to the percentage of F-35's that haven't had the engine fix applied.

Thanks, this makes sense.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh

Return to F-35 Engine

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests