mas wrote:All the stuff you are posting does not disgree with what I said.
Actually the "stuff that I posted" does not disagree and actually agrees with that LM diagram, that's the reality!
The fact that you failed to grasp this by now clearly shows that you don't want to understand this so I won't develop any further because doing it would be a waste of my precious time even because I think that everything was quite well explained.
mas wrote:However considering the anti-European and the F-35 uber alles bias that exists on this site I am not surprised by this constant disbelieving of what European manufacturers say about their products.
Finally, you've shown your "true colors here"!
You're just an (another) Eurofighter "fanboy" and your reply which I quoted above is typical from such a Eurofighter/Rafale/Gripen fanboy and I clearly knew this was the reason why it's pointless to have a discussion with you.
But I would say that yes, it's normal that there's some "F-35 bias" if you will, here. In case you've missed this is the
F-35 section in the F-16.net forum!
But even though you can get here in this forum section some serious throughout analysis showing and proving the advantages of the F-35 over other fighter aircraft. Or are you implying that this forum is "more bias" than any other aviation forum around the web where Typhoon, Rafale, etc... are promoted (and these being actually "Eurocanard bias forums")??
Your previous post, namely the latest part that I quoted also clearly shows one more thing: Due to your European/Typhoon "Fanaticism" you fail to grasp this reality fact -> European military aerospace technology (namely fighter/combat aircraft) lags decades behind the US military aerospace technology (and this has been happening since decades ago)! This is not "hatred" towards European military aerospace technology, this is the reality which you seem so incapable of understanding.
And as such, if you feel that this forum is so "F-35 bias for your taste" why don't you go to other forums instead??
I'm pretty sure that there are lots of forums promoting the Typhoon which like yourself will "clutter" (like the Typhoons sensor fusion) any negative or disadvantageous features that the Typhoon has or may have

Oh, and no-one here is "disbelieving of what European manufacturers say about their products". Actually these analysis that we've been posting are also based on "what European manufacturers are saying about their products".
In fact what's happening here is that instead, you are "over-believing or over-exaggerating what European manufacturers are actually saying about their products".