J-20 VERSUS F-35

The F-35 compared with other modern jets.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

botsing

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 714
  • Joined: 05 Dec 2015, 18:09
  • Location: The Netherlands

Unread post27 Aug 2018, 21:06

sferrin wrote:Given you called me out but not him why would I not think there was bias at play? As for "immature", if it's "immature" to point out your apparent bias, then guilty as charged. :roll:

Let's resolve this in PM. :thumb_up:
"Those who know don’t talk. Those who talk don’t know"
Offline
User avatar

sferrin

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 4697
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

Unread post28 Aug 2018, 00:49

I believe I owe a mea culpa here regarding missile rate launch of the Aegis system. In trying to track down the video of four rapid fire launch (which I never found) I remembered this one. . .that I've had on my channel for 5 years now. :roll: :oops: :doh:

"There I was. . ."
Offline

gta4

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 720
  • Joined: 17 Oct 2010, 19:10

Unread post28 Aug 2018, 02:46

Since simultaneous multiple missile launch is confirmed officially, there is no need to find a video to prove its fire rate. If you cannot find a video showing simultaneous multiple missile launch, it's your problem, or maybe no video is released to public, but you can't deny this capability.
Offline
User avatar

sferrin

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 4697
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

Unread post28 Aug 2018, 03:04

gta4 wrote:Since simultaneous multiple missile launch is confirmed officially, there is no need to find a video to prove its fire rate. If you cannot find a video showing simultaneous multiple missile launch, it's your problem, or maybe no video is released to public, but you can't deny this capability.


To be fair, your link did not say simultaneous launch and the picture you show doesn't even address what system it's talking about.
"There I was. . ."
Offline

gta4

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 720
  • Joined: 17 Oct 2010, 19:10

Unread post28 Aug 2018, 14:01

VLS_multiple.jpg


Source from Lockheed Martin. Happy now?

vls baseline cover.png
Offline
User avatar

sferrin

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 4697
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

Unread post28 Aug 2018, 14:17

gta4 wrote:
VLS_multiple.jpg


Source from Lockheed Martin. Happy now?


How did you divine that given the word "Lockheed" appears nowhere in the document? Look, you're free to believe whatever you want. I'd prefer something a bit more definitive. Sorry. I believe this horse is long dead.
"There I was. . ."
Offline

madrat

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1943
  • Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 03:12

Unread post28 Aug 2018, 14:44

Trademark image top right.
Offline
User avatar

sferrin

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 4697
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

Unread post28 Aug 2018, 15:18

madrat wrote:Trademark image top right.


Good point. I'm probably nit-picking anyway. The most likely limit would be adequate separation between rounds leaving the cells so they don't impinge on one another.
"There I was. . ."
Previous

Return to F-35 versus XYZ

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests