F-35 vs F-22: who would get the first look?
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 402
- Joined: 18 Sep 2016, 03:07
- Location: Home of nuclear submarines, engines, and that's about it.
Hello everyone, I'm sorry if this question has been discussed here before but I have yet to see a consensus on it. So, I was wondering if the f-35 would detect the f-22 first simply because of EODAS. I know that the apg-77 has more t/r modules than the apg-81 but the apg-81 is newer, so I'm not sure which radar is better. I've heard the quote saying that the f-35 is stealthier in some respects than the f-22, but not as stealthy in others. This made me think that if they could detect each other at roughly the same time with their radars, would the f-35's EODAS see the f-22 from farther away than either plane's radar could?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 5997
- Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
- Location: Nashua NH USA
The F-35s Barracuda has jammed the APG-77. Without that the F-22 is blind. End of discussion. F-35 wins.
"Spurts"
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
-PFD Systems Engineer
-PATRIOT Systems Engineer
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
-PFD Systems Engineer
-PATRIOT Systems Engineer
sprstdlyscottsmn wrote:The F-35s Barracuda has jammed the APG-77. Without that the F-22 is blind. End of discussion. F-35 wins.
"Without that the F-22 is blind" Not completely true. The F-22 has other passive sensors and cooperative conops, but when we speak of jamming, sensor operation, and such we tread into classified realms. When we do that ...
Those that know won't say, and those that say don't know. - and that's the end of the discussion
MHO
BP
The interesting thing is that the Raptor was built to be a predator, efficiently preying on inferior 4th gen aircraft. The fact that the F-35 is a bit more rounded means it has systems that might give it an edge against other 5th gen fighters. How it all pans out is going to be highly dependent on things not in the public domain, and is likely to depend greatly on circumstance.
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.
Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.
Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 5997
- Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
- Location: Nashua NH USA
blindpilot wrote:sprstdlyscottsmn wrote:The F-35s Barracuda has jammed the APG-77. Without that the F-22 is blind. End of discussion. F-35 wins.
"Without that the F-22 is blind" Not completely true. The F-22 has other passive sensors and cooperative conops, but when we speak of jamming, sensor operation, and such we tread into classified realms. When we do that ...
Those that know won't say, and those that say don't know. - and that's the end of the discussion
MHO
BP
You are of course right about there being classified information. Without access to the classified information we can only speculate on what we know. What we know is that if the APG-77 is jammed then the F-35 suite has an azimuth and elevation to send the signal. EOTS can follow that track to VID. Based on the unclassified information available the F-35 should win. I would be shocked if it was that simple but since I can't even begin to fathom the true nature of either plane I threw out an overly simplified anecdote for an overly simplified question.
I do not know. I am guessing.
"Spurts"
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
-PFD Systems Engineer
-PATRIOT Systems Engineer
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
-PFD Systems Engineer
-PATRIOT Systems Engineer
- F-16.net Moderator
- Posts: 1892
- Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:47
white_lightning35 wrote:Hello everyone, I'm sorry if this question has been discussed here before...
blindpilot wrote:Those that know won't say, and those that say don't know. - and that's the end of the discussion
Yep, end of discussion.
I'm watching...
7 posts
|Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests