F-35 to replace A-10?

The F-35 compared with other modern jets.
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 46
Joined: 30 Jan 2006, 05:45

by jr1947 » 20 May 2006, 07:19

For the overall picture of this aircraft just take a look at some of the pictures other nice folks have sent in and posted regarding this bird. It's true it's ugly, it's slow, it's like flying a buldozer with wings, but it's return rate after any sorties has an I beleive allways will be excellent. If anything I see down the road is more robotics along with much more advanced avenoics


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 37
Joined: 10 May 2005, 12:14

by Shonuff » 20 May 2006, 23:18

When will the A-10C be ready to go?


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 46
Joined: 30 Jan 2006, 05:45

by jr1947 » 21 May 2006, 02:56

sorry Shonuff, I have no knowledge of this particular airframe. Maybe someone will post an be able to acknowledge your question. best regards jr1947


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 37
Joined: 10 May 2005, 12:14

by Shonuff » 21 May 2006, 03:31

thanks anyway


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 153
Joined: 02 May 2005, 23:47
Location: Shaw AFB

by apags27 » 21 May 2006, 04:12

Shonuff, I do not think there is a public timeline available. Someone please correct me if I am wrong!


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 530
Joined: 25 Jan 2005, 23:08

by swanee » 21 May 2006, 05:59

Units are upgrading now.
Life is too short for ugly sailboats, fat women and bad beer!


Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 393
Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 19:55

by mark » 21 May 2006, 06:04

The PE (precision engagement) mod has started at Hill. Its quite a deal, and gives the aircraft some badly needed capabilities.
Gravity....its not just a good idea, ITS THE LAW!


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 46
Joined: 30 Jan 2006, 05:45

by jr1947 » 22 May 2006, 00:09

hello mark, jr1947 here question, is the A-10 going to try to incoperate the F-35 version as far as the engine transformation? reason I ask is I know alittle about the two engine versions, G.E. & Pratt an I can't possible imagine either engine fitting into the existing airframe. this whole A-10 being part of the JSF program doesn't somehow to fit the package. I allways thought the A-10 was strictly for close ground support. if you would please clearify, maybe i'm missing something here or got my information wrong. best regards,jr1947


Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 393
Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 19:55

by mark » 22 May 2006, 02:21

JR...the A-10 is getting a modification to its avionics. Its not part of the JSF program. The F-35 will eventually replace the A-10, F-16, F-18 and the Harrier. The word is that the A-10 will be around in one form or another until 2028 (subject to change at any moment). The cockpit is getting a complete makeover, to include the aility to use litening2 and/or sniper pods. It is NOT getting new engines. If it ever happens the current engines could end up with new compressor cores and not much more.
Gravity....its not just a good idea, ITS THE LAW!


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: 13 May 2006, 13:33

by Arctus » 22 May 2006, 04:20

The 355th at Eielson is already spun-up on lightening pods. They upgraded in winter 04-05
354 FW Eielson 02-05
389 FS Mtn Home 99-02
54 & 90 FS Elmendorf 91-99
479 TTW Holloman 84-91


Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 393
Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 19:55

by mark » 22 May 2006, 04:27

PE is much more than just a mod to litening pods. They are changing the configuration of the cockpit to include 2 color multi function displays, data link etc. Some of the units did what was known as a T-2 mod to allow their aircraft to fly with targeting pods. It was a bit of a stop gap thing to prove that it could be done. The jets coming out of depot after this mod get the designation "A-10C".
Gravity....its not just a good idea, ITS THE LAW!


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 530
Joined: 25 Jan 2005, 23:08

by swanee » 22 May 2006, 04:29

mark wrote: It is NOT getting new engines. If it ever happens the current engines could end up with new compressor cores and not much more.


At least right now it isn't. The project has existed for years now, but it always gets cut due to budget. (when my old man started flying them in '79 there was talk about engine upgrades!) They want 750 mil for the entire A-10 fleet. Perhaps the avionics upgrades will show the need for better engines... Sure you can have the ability to drop PGMs, but you still can't fly above ~40K, and they don't like hot weather...
Life is too short for ugly sailboats, fat women and bad beer!


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 46
Joined: 30 Jan 2006, 05:45

by jr1947 » 22 May 2006, 11:06

I realize that the JSF program is futureistic an that it is going to be relacing alot of older aircraft but the thought of anything other than the A-10 for close ground support isn't anything i can imagine. granted it is an old work horse but it does what it does. the thing that impressed me the most is the hits the plane can take an the pilot, nothing taken away from them, can still get the bird home. the gattling gun speaks for itself. gotta run, later folks, best regards, jr1947 :)


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 46
Joined: 30 Jan 2006, 05:45

by jr1947 » 22 May 2006, 11:17

hello mark, thanks for the information on the A-10. I was really confused about the whole matter. when I first had heard they were talking F-35's I thought that's going to be like fitting a square peg in a round hole. the whole airframe is going to be reconfigured. then I thought how is this plane going to be able to keep its current capabilities of close ground support with all this added thrust as far as manuverability. to keep it's current 34 engines and just change the compressor/core section makes since now. again best regars, jr


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: 26 May 2005, 19:39

by Guysmiley » 22 May 2006, 15:08



PreviousNext

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 8 guests