F-35? T-1687A / ALE-70 (V)

F-35 Armament, fuel tanks, internal and external hardpoints, loadouts, and other stores.
User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2895
Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 00:03
Location: Houston

by neptune » 24 Nov 2017, 05:33

https://www.afcea.org/content/?q=bae-pr ... ermeasures

BAE to Provide Joint Strike Fighter Transmitter Countermeasures
April 4, 2014

BAE Systems Electronic Solutions, Nashua, N.H., is being awarded a $47,352,248 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity delivery order contract for the manufacture of the transmitter countermeasures T-1687A/ALE-70 (V) in support of the Joint Strike Fighter program. The Naval Supply Systems Command Weapon Systems Support, Mechanicsburg, Pa., is the contracting activity (N00104-14-D-K054).

.....QUESTION!!!!...

is the ALE-70 installed on the F-35??

note* a lot of "blather" rambling around about an Aussie purchase but simply could be for their F-18s. I admit I am not familiar with this specific device, thus the question to those more knowledgeable.
:|


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1102
Joined: 25 Dec 2015, 12:43

by garrya » 24 Nov 2017, 05:59

neptune wrote:
.....QUESTION!!!!...

is the ALE-70 installed on the F-35??

Yes, around 4 decoys
Image
Image
Image
A = Fiber optic towed decoy (ALE-70) dispenser door
F (x2) = Flare doors
Image


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 24 Nov 2017, 06:14

Australia is buying 1952 ALE-70s which seem a lot. Can we infer anything from the qty ordered?

http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/au ... sures-rfcm
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 28404
Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
Location: Australia

by spazsinbad » 24 Nov 2017, 07:31

Here is a good 'ole' 'SWP' Post: viewtopic.php?f=62&t=50951&p=354377&hilit=countermeasures+dispenser#p354377

GOOD THREAD: BAE Systems Inches Out In Public On Electronic Warfare 16 Jul 2016

viewtopic.php?f=62&t=50951&hilit=countermeasures+dispenser



User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2895
Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 00:03
Location: Houston

by neptune » 24 Nov 2017, 11:26

popcorn wrote:Australia is buying 1952 ALE-70s which seem a lot. Can we infer anything from the qty ordered?

http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/au ... sures-rfcm


Yes, in the Spaz reference (an apples and oranges thread of decoying and jamming) the ALE-70 has a 400 hour life limit per a document provided by Spud.

In more simple terms the ALE-70 is an expendable towed RF decoy for spoofing attacking radar controlled missiles. Speculating that there maybe four(ish) ALE-70 per a/c. Similar to the ALE-50 on B-1B and F/A-18E/Fs.
:)


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 24 Nov 2017, 14:28

Does the aircraft have the ability to reel in an ALE-70 that has been deployed?
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5741
Joined: 02 Mar 2017, 14:29

by ricnunes » 24 Nov 2017, 17:12

popcorn wrote:Does the aircraft have the ability to reel in an ALE-70 that has been deployed?


I would say, YES.

For example the ALE-55 does have a reel in option, which can be read on the ALE-55 brochure which can be downloaded from the page below:
http://www.baesystems.com/en-us/product ... owed-decoy
(AN/ALE-55 brochure link)

In the brochure the following can be read:

Reel out/Reel in option
In addition to the standard “fast deploy expendable” decoy,
BAE Systems has flight tested a “Reel out/Reel in” deployment system
for fighter aircraft. Based on a flight-test-proven design for C-130
aircraft, this option replaces expendable decoys with decoys that can
be used again and again. This not only means the decoy will be there
when it’s needed, but it also lowers the system’s life-cycle costs.


So if the ALE-55 has a reel in option than I cannot see why the ALE-70 shouldn't have the same mode as well :wink:
“Active stealth” is what the ignorant nay sayers call EW and pretend like it’s new.


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 24 Nov 2017, 19:22

Thanks ricnunes, though I'm still curious how they manage it without dinging the fuselage . . I still puzzle at the size of the Oz order though. Matbe a Black Friday sale? :mrgreen:
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2895
Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 00:03
Location: Houston

by neptune » 24 Nov 2017, 19:47

popcorn wrote:Thanks ricnunes, though I'm still curious how they manage it without dinging the fuselage . . I still puzzle at the size of the Oz order though. Matbe a Black Friday sale? :mrgreen:


Yes, a bit difference in a ding in a Herc vs. a ding in a Litenen (yes, expendable). Divide the purchase number by the a/c number and the balance would yield the number of flights per 400 hours operating and....the number per each a/c 4(ish)??
:roll:


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5741
Joined: 02 Mar 2017, 14:29

by ricnunes » 24 Nov 2017, 21:54

neptune wrote:
popcorn wrote:Thanks ricnunes, though I'm still curious how they manage it without dinging the fuselage . . I still puzzle at the size of the Oz order though. Matbe a Black Friday sale? :mrgreen:


Yes, a bit difference in a ding in a Herc vs. a ding in a Litenen (yes, expendable). Divide the purchase number by the a/c number and the balance would yield the number of flights per 400 hours operating and....the number per each a/c 4(ish)??
:roll:


Well, if you read the ALE-55 brochure or the quote from the brochure that I posted above:

Reel out/Reel in option
In addition to the standard “fast deploy expendable” decoy,
BAE Systems has flight tested a “Reel out/Reel in” deployment system
for fighter aircraft.
Based on a flight-test-proven design for C-130
aircraft, this option replaces expendable decoys with decoys that can
be used again and again. This not only means the decoy will be there
when it’s needed, but it also lowers the system’s life-cycle costs.


Note the part in bold and underlined :wink:
Well there's a "reel in" system for fighter aircraft, this for the ALE-55.
So again, I don't see why the ALE-70 couldn't have such a system. But yeah, a better clarification on the subject would be great.
“Active stealth” is what the ignorant nay sayers call EW and pretend like it’s new.


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5741
Joined: 02 Mar 2017, 14:29

by ricnunes » 24 Nov 2017, 22:11

This not much but it somehow adds some details about the ALE-70 Australia deal with a little bit more info on the ALE-70:

http://www.airforce-technology.com/news ... a-5893336/


Designed and produced by BAE Systems for deployment from the F-35 aircraft, the ALE-70 towed radio frequency countermeasure consists of the reel/launcher assembly, tow line, T-1687 countermeasure transmitter, and electronic and mechanical sub-assemblies.
“Active stealth” is what the ignorant nay sayers call EW and pretend like it’s new.


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 24 Nov 2017, 22:26

neptune wrote:Speculating that there maybe four(ish) ALE-70 per a/c. Similar to the ALE-50 on B-1B and F/A-18E/Fs.
:)
Correct.


Attachment points for four dispensers can be seen.

Image
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2895
Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 00:03
Location: Houston

by neptune » 24 Nov 2017, 23:30

SpudmanWP wrote:.. :)
Correct. Attachment points for four dispensers can be seen...[/quote]




PUCKER TIME; four missiles!!

Wow! Someone left the flashing "Come on In" sign on!
8)


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 25 Nov 2017, 01:46

OK thanks ric and spud... much clearer now how ALE-70 is to be operated from the jet.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1102
Joined: 25 Dec 2015, 12:43

by garrya » 25 Nov 2017, 02:30

SpudmanWP wrote:Attachment points for four dispensers can be seen.

Brighter photo
Image
Image


Next

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests