Page 15 of 15

Re: SDB II Scores Hits in Flight Tests

Unread postPosted: 24 Aug 2019, 23:50
by marauder2048
squirrelshoes wrote:
weasel1962 wrote:and if really, really don't like the site, there's always the JSOW-A with the nasty BLU-97s. Not sure whether the JSOW-A are integrated but the F-35 is supposed to be able to internally carry JSOWs. ER version for legacies which can launch way outside of the S-series envelope.

There was actually someone on here awhile back saying this wouldn't be a threat to a modern AA gun system since it would just shoot down all 144 submunitions. :D



You need 9 BLU-97s per 1000 sq ft. for a .85 probability of hit (not kill) with the shape charge on a vehicle that's 200 sq ft.
JSOW-A was never flown on trajectories to achieve that density. And if you actually have to accommodate the possibility
that a mobile target might relocate the submunition density is really quite low or the weapons expenditure is
ridiculous.

Re: SDB II Scores Hits in Flight Tests

Unread postPosted: 25 Aug 2019, 00:06
by marauder2048
squirrelshoes wrote:How do you know the defense is more likely to do anything a certain way? Are there examples of an IADS defending a high value target choosing to not engage a potentially devastating incoming missile with their best weapons as soon as the incoming threat is spotted?


GWI: the Iraqis spotted TLAM pretty early but only engaged it with MANPADS because the intended
target area (Baghdad) was predictable.

Re: SDB II Scores Hits in Flight Tests

Unread postPosted: 08 Nov 2019, 03:11
by mmm
squirrelshoes wrote:GWI: the Iraqis spotted TLAM pretty early but only engaged it with MANPADS because the intended
target area (Baghdad) was predictable.


Well I'm not aware that Iraq possessed anything more suitable than MANPADS and AAA against low flying cruise missile in 91, both in terms of capability and availability, so that one can actually catch TLAM within engagement enveloped. But if there's any more detail you can share by all means do so.