Mini Munitions Thread

Sub-scale and Full-Scale Aerial Targets and RPAs - Remotely-Piloted Aircraft
User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 16 Feb 2017, 04:32

There is a proliferation of smart mini munitions suitable for deployment from UAV and rotary aircraft and gunships so this thread will be a convenient home for keeping track of them.

For starters... G-CLAW from Tetron.

G-CLAW
50 lb. glide munition with 20 lb. warhead for anti-personnel/anti-materiel targets
GPS-aided/Inertial Navigation System (INS) with Semi-Active Laser precision guidance
Height of burst (HOB) sensor fuze optimally detonates for lethal effects
360 degree engagement envelope
Compatible with the Common Launch Tube

http://www.textronsystems.com/what-we-d ... ems/g-claw
Attachments
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG (17.29 KiB) Viewed 17807 times
Last edited by popcorn on 16 Feb 2017, 11:03, edited 1 time in total.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5269
Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
Location: Finland

by hornetfinn » 16 Feb 2017, 09:01

I've been wondering why such mini munitions are not used in fighter aircraft also? Since many times collateral damage is a concern and those aircraft are numerous and often used, it would seem smart to arm them with smaller munitions. Of course one can reduce the effect of bombs like SDB FLM. But why not just use smaller munitions like G-CLAW instead?


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 16 Feb 2017, 13:50

Would MMs be up to the stresses encountered by high-performance aircraft?
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5269
Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
Location: Finland

by hornetfinn » 16 Feb 2017, 15:10

popcorn wrote:Would MMs be up to the stresses encountered by high-performance aircraft?


Could well be. I think it'd be pretty easy to design a MM that would work in high-performance aircraft, but it might be more simple and cheaper to just use larger munitions with them. Small munitions might also have funny flight characteristics when released at high speed.


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 16 Feb 2017, 17:10

How is a 4 foot long bomb considered "mini"? :doh:

As far as the F-35 goes, why not create a a launcher with stacked & slanted tubes that looks like \\\\\\ which can fit in the bay of an F-35. You should be able to get 12 per bay easy.
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 17 Feb 2017, 00:15

MBDA SABER. 10-lb glide bomb, SAL, GPS/INS, TV/IR w/data link seeker for man-in-loop in the works. Also available a rocket-powered version for longer range.
Attachments
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG (21.18 KiB) Viewed 17669 times
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh


User avatar
Elite 3K
Elite 3K
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:38

by count_to_10 » 17 Feb 2017, 00:41

I think the real reason is probably that it doesn't fit the F-35 mission profile to be deploying weapons that small. If the target is well protected enough to need an F-35 rather than a cheap drone, it's probably well armored enough to need a larger warhead.
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.

Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.



Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest