Sikorsky May Be Sold to Lockheed
- Elite 1K
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 08:04
Uh... that's gonna be a problem for FVL because LM is already a partner on the V-280.Report: Lockheed Nears $8B Deal for Sikorsky
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defens ... /29979577/
WASHINGTON — Lockheed Martin is nearing an agreement to purchase the Sikorsky helicopter unit from United Technologies Corp. in a deal that could be worth $8 billion....
lookieloo wrote:Uh... that's gonna be a problem for FVL because LM is already a partner on the V-280.Report: Lockheed Nears $8B Deal for Sikorsky
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defens ... /29979577/
WASHINGTON — Lockheed Martin is nearing an agreement to purchase the Sikorsky helicopter unit from United Technologies Corp. in a deal that could be worth $8 billion....
Not necessarily. They can continue V-280 partnership and the Army would srill have a choice.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
Lockheed Martin Q2 report states that they will acquire Sikorsky
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/news/press-releases/2015/july/0720hq-earnings.html
Acquisition of Sikorsky Aircraft
On July 20, 2015, the Corporation announced that it entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Sikorsky Aircraft (Sikorsky), a global company engaged in the design, manufacture and support of military and commercial helicopters, for $9.0 billion of cash, subject to certain adjustments. The Corporation expects to fund the acquisition with a combination of new debt issuances and available cash. The Corporation and United Technologies Corporation have agreed to make a joint election under Section 338(h)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code, which treats the transaction as an asset purchase for tax purposes. This election generates a cash tax benefit with an estimated net present value of $1.9 billion for the Corporation and its shareholders. The acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approval, and is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2015 or the first quarter of 2016. Once the acquisition is complete, the Corporation plans to align Sikorsky under its Mission Systems and Training business segment. The Corporation’s financial results will not include Sikorsky’s results until the acquisition is closed.
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/news/press-releases/2015/july/0720hq-earnings.html
Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
- Elite 1K
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 08:04
I don't see how it couldn't be a problem. On some level, Lockheed leadership will be looking at the two FVL projects to decide which one they want to set up for success...as in most-likely to make the greatest profit for shareholders. The Army will only have the faintest illusion of choice.popcorn wrote:Not necessarily. They can continue V-280 partnership and the Army would srill have a choice.
I wouldn't be surprised if different business units wihin LM would pursue the dual-approach. Besdes, AFAIK Bell is the prime for the V-280 and getting a potential slice of that pie is compelling. A no-lose scenario.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
- Elite 1K
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 08:04
Again... for Lockheed shareholders, possibly not for the Army. We'll see how it goes. I don't have a favorite yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if Defiant gets left to whither on the vine due to its involvement Lockheed's main competitor, Boeing.popcorn wrote:A no-lose scenario.
- Elite 1K
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: 20 Jul 2005, 04:28
- Location: Langley AFB, VA
lookieloo wrote: The Army will only have the faintest illusion of choice.
Anything funded by Uncle Sammy gives Uncle Sammy 100% choice. There is no half-way. Anything funded by the contractor give the contractor 100% choice. Its VERY simple.
- Banned
- Posts: 984
- Joined: 24 Sep 2014, 22:56
checksixx wrote:sergei wrote:Lockheed for plane and Lockheed for helicopter,next Lockheed for ships ?
May want to check out Lockheed Martin...they've been in the ship building business for 10 years.
LOL indeed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protector_USV
And also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_beta_fusion_reactor
checksixx wrote:sergei wrote:Lockheed for plane and Lockheed for helicopter,next Lockheed for ships ?
May want to check out Lockheed Martin...they've been in the ship building business for 10 years.
They still don't build tanks though. (Thinking of GD in the 80s. They did it all.)
"There I was. . ."
11 posts
|Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests