Page 2 of 3

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 25 Mar 2019, 21:48
by swiss
Thanks for your great work litzj.

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 02 Apr 2019, 13:31
by litzj
https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... art-3.html

I conducted sensitivity analysis for the hardware specification of the four missiles

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 19 May 2019, 01:16
by litzj
https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... art-3.html​​​​

Before I expand my simulation, there is few additional result for AIM-120 related stuff

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 19 May 2019, 02:23
by garrya
litzj wrote:https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/05/aim-120c-study-using-missile-sim-part-3.html​​​​

Before I expand my simulation, there is few additional result for AIM-120 related stuff

Spurt made a similar missile sim, i figured his result can be useful to you
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=25735&start=1200
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=25735&start=1110

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 14 Sep 2019, 08:41
by litzj
https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... or_14.html

I have tested generic ATACMS model and its air-launched version

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 03 Nov 2019, 13:43
by litzj
http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... ocket.html

effectiveness of AASM type weapon is analyzed

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 04 Nov 2019, 04:45
by sprstdlyscottsmn
Nice work

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 13 Nov 2019, 14:52
by litzj
I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 13 Nov 2019, 15:20
by sprstdlyscottsmn
That is some really impressive stuff. Hats off to your modeling!

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 14 Nov 2019, 04:19
by garrya
litzj wrote:I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)

Isn't Kh-47 range supposed to be 3000 Km ?

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 14 Nov 2019, 16:07
by litzj
garrya wrote:
litzj wrote:I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)

Isn't Kh-47 range supposed to be 3000 Km ?


As you could see in the result, range can be extended depending on glide angle of it.

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 21 Nov 2019, 11:58
by litzj
https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/1 ... daski.html

Russian version of CUDAski is possible.

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 02 Feb 2020, 02:45
by litzj
http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02 ... n-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 07 Feb 2020, 12:24
by sferrin
litzj wrote:http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02/missile-sim-performance-evaluation-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range


A large missile should have a higher sectional density. (More mass behind each square inch of frontal area, assuming it's not a short, fat missile.) So it should slow down at a lower rate.

Would you be interested in taking a shot at a 2 or 3-stage ATACMs? I can send you some models.

TEL.jpg

Re: Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluatio

Unread postPosted: 15 Mar 2020, 07:06
by litzj
sferrin wrote:
litzj wrote:http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02/missile-sim-performance-evaluation-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range


A large missile should have a higher sectional density. (More mass behind each square inch of frontal area, assuming it's not a short, fat missile.) So it should slow down at a lower rate.

Would you be interested in taking a shot at a 2 or 3-stage ATACMs? I can send you some models.

TEL.jpg


Good to see you here.

I have tested ATACMS options with booster (https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/1 ... n-for.html)

I am now currently code-working for Flight-SIM capable of full-flight simulation including T.O/L.D/SID/STAR/Optimal Cruise