Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluation

swiss · by **swiss** » 25 Mar 2019, 21:48

Thanks for your great work litzj.

litzj · by **litzj** » 02 Apr 2019, 13:31

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... art-3.html

I conducted sensitivity analysis for the hardware specification of the four missiles

litzj · by **litzj** » 19 May 2019, 01:16

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... art-3.html

Before I expand my simulation, there is few additional result for AIM-120 related stuff

garrya · by **garrya** » 19 May 2019, 02:23

litzj wrote:https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/05/aim-120c-study-using-missile-sim-part-3.html

Before I expand my simulation, there is few additional result for AIM-120 related stuff

Spurt made a similar missile sim, i figured his result can be useful to you
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=25735&start=1200
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=25735&start=1110

litzj · by **litzj** » 14 Sep 2019, 08:41

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... or_14.html

I have tested generic ATACMS model and its air-launched version

litzj · by **litzj** » 03 Nov 2019, 13:43

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... ocket.html

effectiveness of AASM type weapon is analyzed

sprstdlyscottsmn · by **sprstdlyscottsmn** » 04 Nov 2019, 04:45

Nice work

litzj · by **litzj** » 13 Nov 2019, 14:52

I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)

sprstdlyscottsmn · by **sprstdlyscottsmn** » 13 Nov 2019, 15:20

That is some really impressive stuff. Hats off to your modeling!

garrya · by **garrya** » 14 Nov 2019, 04:19

litzj wrote:I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)

Isn't Kh-47 range supposed to be 3000 Km ?

litzj · by **litzj** » 14 Nov 2019, 16:07

garrya wrote:
litzj wrote:I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)

Isn't Kh-47 range supposed to be 3000 Km ?

As you could see in the result, range can be extended depending on glide angle of it.

litzj · by **litzj** » 21 Nov 2019, 11:58

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/1 ... daski.html

Russian version of CUDAski is possible.

litzj · by **litzj** » 02 Feb 2020, 02:45

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02 ... n-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range

sferrin · by **sferrin** » 07 Feb 2020, 12:24

litzj wrote:http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02/missile-sim-performance-evaluation-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range

A large missile should have a higher sectional density. (More mass behind each square inch of frontal area, assuming it's not a short, fat missile.) So it should slow down at a lower rate.

Would you be interested in taking a shot at a 2 or 3-stage ATACMs? I can send you some models.

litzj · by **litzj** » 15 Mar 2020, 07:06

sferrin wrote:
litzj wrote:http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02/missile-sim-performance-evaluation-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range

A large missile should have a higher sectional density. (More mass behind each square inch of frontal area, assuming it's not a short, fat missile.) So it should slow down at a lower rate.

Would you be interested in taking a shot at a 2 or 3-stage ATACMs? I can send you some models.

TEL.jpg

Good to see you here.

I have tested ATACMS options with booster (https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/1 ... n-for.html)

I am now currently code-working for Flight-SIM capable of full-flight simulation including T.O/L.D/SID/STAR/Optimal Cruise