Chinese claims they detect F-22 from 450 km away

Anything goes, as long as it is about the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor
User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2339
Joined: 27 Mar 2015, 16:05

by eloise » 29 Jan 2019, 02:24

During a talk holding in a research workshop, the chief scientist of the China's largest radar group, CETC, Dr Wu Jianqi, told the audience that China's anti-stealth radar is the world most advanced anti-stealth radar.

It solved all the tech difficulties that other countries failed to solve and the 4th generation anti-stealth radar CETC developed, their radar, is the world's only anti-stealth radar that can not only spot but also track and guide fire-control radar to attack enemy stealth aircrafts in a range of over 500 km.

During the talk, he give an example that their last generation anti-stealth radar track F-22 fighters in East Asia flying 450 km away.

And he told the audience China airforce now cover the entire China coastline with such highly advanced anti-stealth radar, such that US stealth fighters will be meaningless.

Can someone translate the slide?
220200s51o4ovv5ovn1ve1.jpg

220205l700y3yl2y55o3fa.jpg

220209ssqfllsrcjlfspsf.jpg

220218qopdak2r22w9d62d.jpg

222204y5mmh453jjbvamus.jpg


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 9792
Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14

by Corsair1963 » 29 Jan 2019, 03:16

So, is China going to stop the development of both the J-20 and J-31??? As everyone knows the F-22 is more stealthy than either of the aforementioned. Clearly, Stealth Fighters are no longer a serious threat.... :wink:


Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2500
Joined: 12 Jan 2014, 19:26

by charlielima223 » 29 Jan 2019, 05:17

Are we really going to go through all this again? :bang: :bang:

Image

Unless they found some way to bend the fundamental laws of physics I call male bovine excrement. Besides I take most claims by Chinese state run media with a grain of salt... as in pass the salt shaker and leave it here.


Banned
 
Posts: 2848
Joined: 23 Jul 2013, 16:19
Location: New Jersey

by zero-one » 29 Jan 2019, 07:51

Or rather they tracked what they think was an F-22 from 450 km away
How did they confirm this by the way?
Did they call the contact?

Hey are you and F-22
Why yes I am an F-22 how did you know?


Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 274
Joined: 05 Jan 2007, 22:36
Location: Aust.

by beepa » 29 Jan 2019, 10:13

I suppose it's possible if the F22 still has Lunebergs fitted.


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5184
Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
Location: Finland

by hornetfinn » 29 Jan 2019, 11:03

beepa wrote:I suppose it's possible if the F22 still has Lunebergs fitted.


Very possible along with EFTs. Anyway, making a radar capable of tracking F-22 at those ranges is definitely not impossible. Just make a huge and very sensitive antenna and couple it with massive processing power. Problem is that it would be pretty vulnerable during war due to their massive size.


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 29 Jan 2019, 11:10

The Chinese obviously don't believe in OPSEC. :devil:
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5319
Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:26
Location: Parts Unknown

by mixelflick » 29 Jan 2019, 13:09

The translated slide reads as follows...

"This is complete fiction, and any suckers believing it are even dumber than they look..."

:mrgreen:


User avatar
Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1722
Joined: 02 Feb 2018, 21:55

by marsavian » 29 Jan 2019, 13:26

JORN was supposed to have detected B-2 flights, the trick though ultimately is that the X-band fire control radar on the missile has to track, it all ultimately comes down to that end puzzle. It's all very well spotting incoming but no good if you can't shoot them down.

https://web.archive.org/web/20071116065 ... page37.htm

State of Stealth - Aviation Week

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... KQwruILkML


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5907
Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

by sferrin » 29 Jan 2019, 14:13

marsavian wrote:JORN was supposed to have detected B-2 flights, the trick though ultimately is that the X-band fire control radar on the missile has to track, it all ultimately comes down to that end puzzle. It's all very well spotting incoming but no good if you can't shoot them down.

https://web.archive.org/web/20071116065 ... page37.htm

State of Stealth - Aviation Week

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... KQwruILkML


The B-2 also possesses radar enhancement devices. Do we know they weren't deployed when they were "detected"?
"There I was. . ."


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5986
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
Location: Nashua NH USA

by sprstdlyscottsmn » 29 Jan 2019, 15:06

I've also spoken to someone who inadvertently locked up a B-2 with an F-15E radar back in the 90s while it was on a test stand. The B-2 was landing and had it's gear down. He was testing the radar after a repair, saw a blip on the scope, locked it up, and within seconds the blip would disappear. He thought the radar was busted until he got a call from someone (I think it was the tower) to stop locking up the B-2 as it was forcing them to abort it's landings by engaging the defense mechanisms (no word on what that means).
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
-PFD Systems Engineer
-PATRIOT Systems Engineer


Banned
 
Posts: 2848
Joined: 23 Jul 2013, 16:19
Location: New Jersey

by zero-one » 29 Jan 2019, 15:20

sprstdlyscottsmn wrote: He thought the radar was busted until he got a call from someone (I think it was the tower) to stop locking up the B-2 as it was forcing them to abort it's landings by engaging the defense mechanisms (no word on what that means).

I guess its safe to say that the "defensive mechanism" involved automatically closing down all doors and bomb bays.

Curious, would it be possible to emit a radio signal that looks like its painting a target or locking up on a target and broadcast that signal over a wide area. That way, all stealth aircraft with similar defensive mechanisms will be forced to automatically close down all their doors and weapons bays.

And from that story, it looks like there is no override switch.


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5907
Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

by sferrin » 29 Jan 2019, 16:34

zero-one wrote:
sprstdlyscottsmn wrote: He thought the radar was busted until he got a call from someone (I think it was the tower) to stop locking up the B-2 as it was forcing them to abort it's landings by engaging the defense mechanisms (no word on what that means).

I guess its safe to say that the "defensive mechanism" involved automatically closing down all doors and bomb bays.

Curious, would it be possible to emit a radio signal that looks like its painting a target or locking up on a target and broadcast that signal over a wide area. That way, all stealth aircraft with similar defensive mechanisms will be forced to automatically close down all their doors and weapons bays.

And from that story, it looks like there is no override switch.


If there is any truth to that it probably took about 3.2 seconds to implement a software fix. No way is an enemy going to be able to force B-2 bay doors to stay closed by broadcasting a signal.
"There I was. . ."


User avatar
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 923
Joined: 05 Dec 2015, 18:09
Location: The Netherlands

by botsing » 29 Jan 2019, 19:38

sferrin wrote:If there is any truth to that it probably took about 3.2 seconds to implement a software fix. No way is an enemy going to be able to force B-2 bay doors to stay closed by broadcasting a signal.

I thought the same, no override for such an event sounds like a class A accident waiting to happen.
"Those who know don’t talk. Those who talk don’t know"


Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 457
Joined: 01 Jul 2015, 21:42

by citanon » 29 Jan 2019, 23:45

This same radar system just got pulverized by the Israelis at Damascus airport, Along with a couple of Russian tor m1.


Next

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests