Here is the original article I believe:
"doesn't necessarily have to fear the F-22 in all aspects."
That sounds to me as though the Typhoon is being overwhelmed in the 'majority' if not more, of comparable parameters. The key words are "necessarily" and "all".
I remember back in the mid 1980s there was an article (don't remember the magazine) showing a F-15 Eagle in the gunsight of a RAF Jaguar. The pipper was clearly on the back of the F-15. This tells us nothing of the two jets. We don't know the ROE or the quality of the pilots involved. Even Active and Reserve Phantoms at times had gun kills on teen series jets. I love the Phantom, but it CLEARLY was inferior to all of them. The F-4 aviators must have been damn good, and the teen series pilots rookies. For example: "In the 1982 Felix International Fighter Meet, VF-201 equipped with ancient F-4N Phantoms took first place honors achieving a 15:2 kill ratio over USAF and USN adversaries flying the more modern and agile F-5E, F-14, F-15, and F-16."
Also, I am a huge Rafale, EF fan. But it is rather ironic when their fans tell us about how they killed the Raptor in DACT; yet they are totally SILENT when (at times) outdated teen series MLU/Turkish Vipers, Saudi Eagles, and Hornets have killed ALL THE EUROCANARDS IN DACT! Just do a search and you will find the pics/articles. Some of the vids are on YT.
Am I suppose to conclude that an ancient 1983 model MLU is superior to a 2010 Eurofighter? Or an aging early nineties Hornet is superior to Rafale? We don't know the ROE (neutral, offensive, defensive, 1v1, many v many). What about pilot skill? Their fans are being hypocritical and not applying the same criterion as when they beat on their chests about a rare Raptor kill.