F-22 AIRST

Anything goes, as long as it is about the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

milosh

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 759
  • Joined: 27 Feb 2008, 23:40
  • Location: Serbia, Belgrade

Unread post25 May 2014, 19:34

Is there any info about cancelled Raptor IRST? Is there any chance F-22 even get IRST?
Offline

bring_it_on

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 929
  • Joined: 30 Apr 2014, 14:32

Unread post18 Jul 2014, 14:48

It needs to get MADL and then keep a few F-35s close by to share passive targeting.

For some info on the IRST read these threads -

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/i ... 0/all.html

and

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/i ... 5.390.html
Offline

aaam

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 866
  • Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 22:52

Unread post21 Jul 2014, 21:58

bring_it_on wrote:It needs to get MADL and then keep a few F-35s close by to share passive targeting.

For some info on the IRST read these threads -

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/i ... 0/all.html

and

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/i ... 5.390.html


MADL has been dropped from future plans for Raptor.
Offline

lookieloo

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1244
  • Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 08:04

Unread post21 Jul 2014, 22:17

aaam wrote:MADL has been dropped from future plans for Raptor.
Pretty much everything has been dropped from future plans for the Raptor. With only ~180 airframes, development/integration of upgrades isn't worth the trouble, especially as the F-35 comes on-line. I expect they'll all end up in the bone-yard whilst some F-15Cs are still flying, a crying shame.
Offline
User avatar

popcorn

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 7691
  • Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

Unread post22 Jul 2014, 04:17

At least 2 threads on these boards dealing with Jetpack, Project Missouri highlighting priority being given to linking different 5G platforms as well as 5G to 4G. Many ways proposed to skin that particular cat.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
Offline

wrightwing

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3219
  • Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 15:22

Unread post22 Jul 2014, 14:00

lookieloo wrote:
aaam wrote:MADL has been dropped from future plans for Raptor.
Pretty much everything has been dropped from future plans for the Raptor. With only ~180 airframes, development/integration of upgrades isn't worth the trouble, especially as the F-35 comes on-line. I expect they'll all end up in the bone-yard whilst some F-15Cs are still flying, a crying shame.


I wouldn't say that. Increments 3.1, 3.2, 3.3...... All of these add new and improved capabilities.
Offline

steakanddoritos

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 112
  • Joined: 22 Nov 2013, 20:59

Unread post22 Jul 2014, 16:44

lookieloo wrote:
aaam wrote:MADL has been dropped from future plans for Raptor.
Pretty much everything has been dropped from future plans for the Raptor. With only ~180 airframes, development/integration of upgrades isn't worth the trouble, especially as the F-35 comes on-line. I expect they'll all end up in the bone-yard whilst some F-15Cs are still flying, a crying shame.

Considering how long the USAF has dragged more life out of its F-16's and F-15's, I'd say that's a miscalculation. The Raptor will have every last bit of life squeezed out of it. Even in the future it will still be a capable platform. Bear in mind that both the F-22 and the F-35 are designed with far more modular and robust airframes than previous 4th gen aircraft. Also, in the future, it is not a stretch to assume that maintenece procedures and equipment will be far superior than what we have today, allowing operators to lengthen the service lives of their equipment greatly.
Offline

arcturus

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 131
  • Joined: 12 Jan 2014, 19:26

Unread post24 Jul 2014, 01:33

wrightwing wrote:
lookieloo wrote:
aaam wrote:MADL has been dropped from future plans for Raptor.
Pretty much everything has been dropped from future plans for the Raptor. With only ~180 airframes, development/integration of upgrades isn't worth the trouble, especially as the F-35 comes on-line. I expect they'll all end up in the bone-yard whilst some F-15Cs are still flying, a crying shame.


I wouldn't say that. Increments 3.1, 3.2, 3.3...... All of these add new and improved capabilities.


+1 :thumb:
Offline

disconnectedradical

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 718
  • Joined: 31 Dec 2010, 00:44
  • Location: San Antonio, TX

Unread post28 Jul 2014, 06:58

According to one source I've read a while back, the leading edge flaps on the production F-22 got extended inwards because they got rid of the AIRST, which would've been at the wing root. Now there have been some talks of upgrading the F-22's MLD to have IRST functionality like the F-35's DAS, which I think would be a substantial upgrade.

That said, I think the dedicated AIRST of the F-22 would have a smaller field of view compared to each camera of the MLD, so the dedicated system could have better range and target identification. Here are some pictures of current sensor locations on the F-22.

Image
Image

I'm wondering if it's still possible to retrofit them into the wing root somehow (might not be possible).
Offline

Lightndattic

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 546
  • Joined: 06 Oct 2005, 12:43
  • Location: Dallas, Texas

Unread post06 Aug 2014, 15:50

I don't know how much I'd trust that schematic for the Raptor. There are not countermeasure dispensers on the top of the fuselage as shown in the middle illustration and pic. The innermost locations on both sides are where the APU and gun are.
Offline

milosh

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 759
  • Joined: 27 Feb 2008, 23:40
  • Location: Serbia, Belgrade

Unread post06 Aug 2014, 16:15

Offline

geogen

Banned

  • Posts: 3123
  • Joined: 11 Mar 2008, 15:28
  • Location: 45 km offshore, New England

Unread post07 Aug 2014, 07:45

steakanddoritos wrote:
lookieloo wrote:
aaam wrote:MADL has been dropped from future plans for Raptor.
Pretty much everything has been dropped from future plans for the Raptor. With only ~180 airframes, development/integration of upgrades isn't worth the trouble, especially as the F-35 comes on-line. I expect they'll all end up in the bone-yard whilst some F-15Cs are still flying, a crying shame.

Considering how long the USAF has dragged more life out of its F-16's and F-15's, I'd say that's a miscalculation. The Raptor will have every last bit of life squeezed out of it. Even in the future it will still be a capable platform. Bear in mind that both the F-22 and the F-35 are designed with far more modular and robust airframes than previous 4th gen aircraft. Also, in the future, it is not a stretch to assume that maintenece procedures and equipment will be far superior than what we have today, allowing operators to lengthen the service lives of their equipment greatly.


Which is only 'necessary' sadly (as a last-resort), due to a fundamentally flawed (anti-seamless and unsustainable) modernization and recap/acquisition process being implemented still today.

Given more strategic planning and prudent process though, there would most likely be more balanced and sensible upgrade, life-extension and new-build procurement in actual benefit to national defense and security policy. God speed.
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
Offline

geogen

Banned

  • Posts: 3123
  • Joined: 11 Mar 2008, 15:28
  • Location: 45 km offshore, New England

Unread post07 Aug 2014, 07:55

milosh wrote:Is there any info about cancelled Raptor IRST? Is there any chance F-22 even get IRST?


Buy a few new-build F-15SA+ (w/ AGP-82, etc) for USAF and simply equip with IRST (as well as modern ECM capabilities) as 'escort' for F-22 in future. Call it a day.
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
Offline
User avatar

sferrin

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 5341
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

Unread post07 Aug 2014, 13:24

geogen wrote:Which is only 'necessary' sadly (as a last-resort), due to a fundamentally flawed (anti-seamless and unsustainable) modernization and recap/acquisition process being implemented still today.

Given more strategic planning and prudent process though, there would most likely be more balanced and sensible upgrade, life-extension and new-build procurement in actual benefit to national defense and security policy. God speed.



Well you got all the right buzzwords in there. :roll: Unfortunately you forgot the biggest problem when it comes to planning: the politicians.
"There I was. . ."
Offline
User avatar

XanderCrews

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 5917
  • Joined: 16 Oct 2012, 19:42

Unread post07 Aug 2014, 13:56

geogen wrote:
milosh wrote:Is there any info about cancelled Raptor IRST? Is there any chance F-22 even get IRST?


Buy a few new-build F-15SA+ (w/ AGP-82, etc) for USAF and simply equip with IRST (as well as modern ECM capabilities) as 'escort' for F-22 in future. Call it a day.



or simply put an IRST on an F-22. call it a day.
Choose Crews
Next

Return to General F-22A Raptor forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests