F-22 Database and photo thread
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 39
- Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:52
Hi guys,
Any news about these birds ?
05 4100 AK or HO ?
06 4108 and 4110 AK 90th or 525th ?
07 4132 ghost bird ?
07 4137
07 4138
07 4142
07 4145 to 4148
07 4150
08 4151
THANKS for any update !
(nb 05 4104 now a HO bird)
http://www.f-16.net/aircraft-database/F-22
Any news about these birds ?
05 4100 AK or HO ?
06 4108 and 4110 AK 90th or 525th ?
07 4132 ghost bird ?
07 4137
07 4138
07 4142
07 4145 to 4148
07 4150
08 4151
THANKS for any update !
(nb 05 4104 now a HO bird)
http://www.f-16.net/aircraft-database/F-22
- Forum Veteran
- Posts: 659
- Joined: 23 May 2005, 02:13
juve57 wrote:Hi guys,
Any news about these birds ?
05 4100 AK or HO ?
06 4108 and 4110 AK 90th or 525th ?
07 4132 ghost bird ?
07 4137
07 4138
07 4142
07 4145 to 4148
07 4150
08 4151
THANKS for any update !
(nb 05 4104 now a HO bird)
4108 and 4110 are 525 birds. 4137-4151 are 90th jets.
- Banned
- Posts: 3123
- Joined: 11 Mar 2008, 15:28
For the record; especially given the premature shut-down of F-22 fleet procurement, I have a personal problem with annoucing and updating play-by-play, strategic F-22 tail numbers and deployments, etc...
Perhaps USAF would concur? Maybe I'm just misreading it.
Perhaps USAF would concur? Maybe I'm just misreading it.
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
- Elite 1K
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: 20 Jul 2005, 04:28
- Location: Langley AFB, VA
Everyone already knows how many are being produced and tail (code/block) numbers are public domain...especially considering both the Air Force and Lockheed Martin release them and sometimes update that information online. No one has posted anything concerning deployments here.
- Forum Veteran
- Posts: 659
- Joined: 23 May 2005, 02:13
There's nothing "strategic" about tail numbers. If this were the case then why aren't we concerned about the extensive F-16 tail number data base on here?
- Banned
- Posts: 3123
- Joined: 11 Mar 2008, 15:28
I'm just suggesting that perhaps we should wait(?) for USAF to make those numbers 'public' as you say, and not try to advise ourselves beforehand?
Absolutely there is a tactical interest, regarding the actual tail-number/inter-squadron changing??
Especially with a preamature shut-down, small number combat-coded force to work with.. Thats all.
Absolutely there is a tactical interest, regarding the actual tail-number/inter-squadron changing??
Especially with a preamature shut-down, small number combat-coded force to work with.. Thats all.
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
- Forum Veteran
- Posts: 659
- Joined: 23 May 2005, 02:13
There's no difference knowing Raptor tail numbers compared to Vipers or eagles or warthogs....... Numbers of PAI have nothing to do with it. Like checksixx said, LM and the AIR FORCE its self have already released tail numbers and locations. Nothing was posted about deployments or TDYs or anything of that sort. Not to mention strategic and tactical are two totally different things. And no, knowing tail numbers at bases is not going to be a huge strategic loss for us and lose the war. What the Air Force doesn't tell you is what tail numbers are where at any one time (spares, loans, BAI) and what they're doing there. That's where things differ. Knowing which tails are assigned to which base is not an issue. If the Air Force didn't want you to know assigned bases/tail nubers, there would be no base codes OR serial numbers painted on the tails.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests