F-22 Database and photo thread
- Active Member
- Posts: 179
- Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 04:39
87, 95, 100 and 107 have HO flashes....only 86 has an AK flash although ALL of them are at Holloman......... as for 095, this is the latest info I have from about a month ago so if it has been sent to Langley Id like to know. The 8th FS aircraft might be moved earlier since they will never aquire a full squadron anyway.
064 was seen at Nellis last week marked HH (pic is is in uploads). also 016 was recoded TY in July, but has not left Nellis as yet.
095 was marked HO last I saw it, but that was back in March.
095 was marked HO last I saw it, but that was back in March.
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 57
- Joined: 22 Dec 2010, 07:49
- Location: Zeist, The Netherlands
Hi I am new here and recently I was at Nellis and saw overthere the triple 1. I recorder this one as coded WA, but the database says OT. Did I made a misnote for 011 or did 111 transferred to WA.
Thans for your help
regards
Dennis Peteri
Thans for your help
regards
Dennis Peteri
- F-16.net Editor
- Posts: 3083
- Joined: 23 Aug 2003, 12:02
air-to-air wrote:Hi I am new here and recently I was at Nellis and saw overthere the triple 1. I recorder this one as coded WA, but the database says OT. Did I made a misnote for 011 or did 111 transferred to WA.
Thans for your help
regards
Dennis Peteri
Send me the details & any photos with here new markings as its likely '111' has changed hands.
Cheers
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 57
- Joined: 22 Dec 2010, 07:49
- Location: Zeist, The Netherlands
Thanks for your fast confirmation. Looks like a misnote form my site.
03-4058 came into Nellis after sunset Friday marked HH. along with an HH tanker. hope it stays long enough to get a pic.
03-4048 showed up at Nellis marked HH yesterday.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests