Can We Have a Naval Section?

lookieloo · by **lookieloo** » 31 Jul 2013, 03:55

I realize the issue of this on a site titled "f-16.net"; but given the all-consuming nature of "air-sea battle" and the "Pacific pivot," maybe we should have a place to discuss surface-combatants/submarines.

rotosequence · by **rotosequence** » 31 Jul 2013, 12:56

lookieloo wrote:I realize the issue of this on a site titled "f-16.net"; but given the all-consuming nature of "air-sea battle" and the "Pacific pivot," maybe we should have a place to discuss surface-combatants/submarines.

And carrier air wings, while we're at it.

lookieloo · by **lookieloo** » 31 Jul 2013, 19:33

rotosequence wrote:
lookieloo wrote:I realize the issue of this on a site titled "f-16.net"; but given the all-consuming nature of "air-sea battle" and the "Pacific pivot," maybe we should have a place to discuss surface-combatants/submarines.
And carrier air wings, while we're at it.

And maybe the carriers themselves.

deadseal · by **deadseal** » 01 Aug 2013, 23:57

and tanks...I loooove tanks. oh and dudes with bazookas too

lookieloo · by **lookieloo** » 02 Aug 2013, 00:37

deadseal wrote:and tanks...I loooove tanks. oh and dudes with bazookas too

Yeah, change the name to "Defense Forum US" while your at it... :wink:

dragracingmaniac · by **dragracingmaniac** » 02 Aug 2013, 07:18

Mortars, lotsa mortars ! I <3 mortars!