| Author |
Message |
|
Boman
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2008 - 11:14 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 08, 2004
Posts: 609
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Sep 08, 2008 - 12:59 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Henrik
|
Posted: Jan 07, 2008 - 12:07 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 12, 2005
Posts: 1543
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
KXY
|
Posted: Jan 07, 2008 - 12:31 AM
|
|
|
Regular User

Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Posts: 43
Location: Houston area
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
JochemP
|
Posted: Jan 08, 2008 - 07:37 AM
|
|
|
Active member

Joined: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 172
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Fjordmonkey
|
Posted: Jan 08, 2008 - 11:58 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Sep 03, 2007
Posts: 4
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
|
Very nice shot of the Hangar Queen (665)  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
vegasdave901
|
Posted: Jan 31, 2008 - 11:44 PM
|
|
|
Frequent Poster

Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Posts: 55
Status: Offline
|
| So they're FS36270 all-over? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Boman
|
Posted: Feb 01, 2008 - 04:52 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 08, 2004
Posts: 609
Status: Offline
|
|
vegasdave901 wrote:
So they're FS36270 all-over?
Yes! FS36270 is close enough, although some will argue FS26270. The difference is the glossiness of the coating. |
_________________ Best regards
Niels
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|