| Author |
Message |
|
_Viper_
|
Posted: Dec 25, 2007 - 12:38 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Posts: 62
Status: Offline
|
Hello!
I do know something about targeting pods but the whole target identification is quite a mystery for me. Let's imagine a very big battlefield or a city and lots of buildings and possible targets there. How pilots can actually find their specific target from there? I mean do the pod act like a navigator itself with GPS data on it or does the pilot have to rely on other information like pictures from the target or something like that?
"A "horizon-natural" system automatically flipped the image over if it became inverted." This sentence from vectorsite.com really made me wonder. Does the actual FLIR system flips over or is it just all the computers which do the job? http://www.vectorsite.net/twbomb_12.html
Thank You for the answers and have a great new year 2008!  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Oct 16, 2008 - 5:28 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
crazyal611
|
Posted: Dec 25, 2007 - 05:28 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 119
Status: Offline
|
Viper,
I hate to say it, but i think you are asking the wrong question in this forum. Not only is the info you seek possibly sensitive as for as a national security standpoint, but it could also be sensitive from a proprietary standpoint. very few people i think would be willing to give you the info that you seek... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
_Viper_
|
Posted: Dec 25, 2007 - 10:26 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Posts: 62
Status: Offline
|
| Yeah I wasn't too sure about that either but I decided to ask anyway. When playing Falcon 4.0 AF these questions just popped into my mind. Well moderators can lock/remove this thread anytime they want and I don't mind that at all. And to remind you all I'm not interested in any information what doesn't need to be known. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Guysmiley
|
Posted: Dec 26, 2007 - 02:58 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: May 26, 2005
Posts: 1136
|
Without getting into need-to-know issues, flipping the image is easier to do in software than it is to rotate the imager 180 degrees. Back in the Pave Tack era it may have been different, but a layman's guess would be modern targeting pods just flip the image over with computer code.
As to how targets are found, especially in urban environments, there are soldiers that specifically handle that role. Here's a nice article discussing it: http://www.afa.org/magazine/Aug2005/0805target.asp |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Dec 26, 2007 - 03:31 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2850
|
PAVE TACK
What a piece of amazing gear... It was huge. I saw those hung on occassion on the centerline of RF-4s when they were new . The test equipment in the backshop was impressive too.
Guns. New generation pods can provide a geo location or snap to a geo location. As you can guess, that saves a lot of workload for a single seat attack jet like the F-16.  |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Purplehaze
|
Posted: Dec 26, 2007 - 06:14 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 1206
Status: Offline
|
| Without giving any secrets every POD is different. Some are IFR, some are video,.......so with that said it's hard to answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Purplehaze
|
Posted: Dec 26, 2007 - 07:07 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 1206
Status: Offline
|
| Without giving any secrets every POD is different. Some are IFR, some are video,.......so with that said it's hard to answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
_Viper_
|
Posted: Dec 26, 2007 - 07:24 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Posts: 62
Status: Offline
|
Many thanks to everyone for your patience!
http://www.ausairpower.net/TE-AVQ-26-GBU-15.html
This Aussie site is pretty impressive when it comes to the information. For example this page about Pave Tack and GBU-15 contains quite strange words for me Oh and I remember that Pave Tack system was also known as Pave Drag because of its size. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Dec 26, 2007 - 07:52 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2850
|
Especially when some of the RF-4 peeps had it for a while. At least with the F-111 you could pull it into the bay. With the RF-4 it was pure fuel consumption.  |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mushmouth
|
Posted: Dec 27, 2007 - 02:42 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Posts: 204
Status: Offline
|
All I can say is that targeting pods and sniper's look good on the new CCIP MFDs!!
 |
_________________ '00-'06 Shaw F16CJ/D GE-129
'06-'07 Kunsan F16C/D GE-100
'07-Pres Dyess B1B F101-GE102
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ViperDude
|
Posted: Dec 27, 2007 - 03:59 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Posts: 139
Status: Offline
|
|
_Viper_ wrote:
I do know something about targeting pods but the whole target identification is quite a mystery for me. Let's imagine a very big battlefield or a city and lots of buildings and possible targets there. How pilots can actually find their specific target from there? I mean do the pod act like a navigator itself with GPS data on it or does the pilot have to rely on other information like pictures from the target or something like that?
Generally speaking, targeting pods either generate gps coordinates from firing a laser or they fire on a pre-designated coordinate from mission planning/intel or get coordinates from ground controllers.
Cheers,
ViperDude |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Dec 27, 2007 - 12:57 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2850
|
Don't forget. New targeting pods are being integrated with ROVER.  |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
33.48 KB |
| Viewed: |
1533 Time(s) |

|
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ACMIguy
|
Posted: Dec 27, 2007 - 02:03 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 667
Status: Offline
|
As you know Google has a few good sites you can find basic information.
http://www.defense-update.com/directory/litening.htm
You will seldom if ever see data from the actual picture because some of that is classified. Even on strike films on You Tube will have section blocked or covered before they are released.
We used to run up TGM Mavericks on the ramp checking them out for video. I used to think the inferred versions were pretty cool until I ran a LANTIRN pod.
At one desert location I was able to see and track a truck in IR mode along a mountain road. I could see the motor and wheels very clearly. I can't say what the range was but without the pod I would never have known he was out there.
The newer pods are even better with zoom and lock at even longer distances.
What you can see and how to employ it can be seen by playing Falcon 4 or Janes F-15E games. They will give you the best information without getting anyone upset. Even in the games mission planing is the key unless you are covering a known area looking for targets of opportunity, like a Predator.
You better have good Intel on who is good and who is bad or it will certainly get ugly. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Conan
|
Posted: Dec 29, 2007 - 06:51 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Posts: 163
Status: Offline
|
|
elp wrote:
Don't forget. New targeting pods are being integrated with ROVER.
That'd be a bit draggy wouldn't it?  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|