Joined: Sep 29, 2006
Posts: 177
Location: Philadelphia
Status: Offline
Can someone please tell me the latest cost estimates for each F-35 version (flyaway unit cost full production)? Or at least point me in the right direction… Much appreciated.
_________________ "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
Sponsor
Posted: Jul 25, 2008 - 6:44 AM
F-16.net Sponsor
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
dwightlooi
Posted: Dec 21, 2007 - 01:49 AM
Elite
Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Posts: 909
Status: Offline
..
Last edited by dwightlooi on Dec 21, 2007 - 01:52 AM; edited 1 time in total
dwightlooi
Posted: Dec 21, 2007 - 01:52 AM
Elite
Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Posts: 909
Status: Offline
PhillyGuy wrote:
Can someone please tell me the latest cost estimates for each F-35 version (flyaway unit cost full production)? Or at least point me in the right direction… Much appreciated.
$48.5 million F-35A
$61 million F-35B
GAO - 2006 report (given in 2005 dollars).
But this is believe to be flyaway + R&D amortization.
If you take $40 billion divided by 2500 planes, the R&D tag is about $16 million per aircraft.
LMAggie
Posted: Dec 21, 2007 - 02:53 AM
Veteran
Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 273
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
What would a Block 60 F-16 go for right now?
_________________ “Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
LinkF16SimDude
Posted: Dec 21, 2007 - 03:40 AM
Elite
Joined: Jan 31, 2004
Posts: 1476
Location: Near Beale St., Tenn.
Status: Offline
Just a WAG but I'd say $40 to $45 million flyaway. The question to ask tho is would we have to pay the UAE? They pretty much bankrolled the entire Block 60 run after all. It was a purely commercial contract with LockMart with DoD blessings.
Irony is funny that way.
_________________ Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
Sundowner
Posted: Dec 21, 2007 - 01:46 PM
Regular User
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Posts: 54
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
checksixx wrote:
You're right...you know...with all those B747's that we've been shooting down lately, the gun makes it a lot easier...LoL
You know history likes to repeat itself, and not once an airliner will be used as oversized, 'cheap' cruise missile. And the internal gun is the best way to deal with them, when needed too.
checksixx
Posted: Dec 21, 2007 - 01:55 PM
Elite
Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1021
Status: Offline
Really? So how many airliners have you shot down and what effect did the AtA missiles have on them vs. the gun? Any info you could provide would be very interesting to hear! Thanks.
Sundowner
Posted: Dec 21, 2007 - 03:03 PM
Regular User
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Posts: 54
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
I didn't shoot down any aircraft in my life (not to mention all those in video games ), but, limiting ourself to the jet age:
1. El Al Flight 402 - 27th July 1955 - Lockheed Constellation, shot down by Bulgarian MiG-15s (that one was actually shredded to peaces by the MiGs cannons)
2. Libyan Arab Airlines Flight 114 - 21st February 1973 - Boeing 727, shot down by Israeli F-4s (shoot at with 20mm with intention to cripple, not destroy, aircraft made an unsuccessful emergency landing, only 5 survivors)
3. Korean Air Lines Flight 902 - 20th April 1978 - Boeing 707, was victim of two Soviet Su-15 (two R-60 missiles, killed two passengers and caused cabin decompression, forcing plane to land)
4. Korean Air Lines Flight 007 - 1th September 1983 - Boeing 747, shot down by Soviet Su-15 (probably by two R-98M1 missiles, no survivors).
By that 4 incidents one can take a conclusion, that heat seeking missiles are the worst for the job, and the SARH missiles give a much higher kill probability. Yet, a gun still give a choice, one may kill the target, or just cripple it - forcing it to land.
checksixx
Posted: Dec 21, 2007 - 03:25 PM
Elite
Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1021
Status: Offline
Brother, I don't know what the ROE's are in your country, but most everywhere you do not engage to "cripple" an aircraft. You put rounds into an aircraft, you should expect it to go down...plain and simple. My take is, you attempt to "cripple" an aircraft by firing at/into it, you should be held as a criminal.
SnakeHandler
Posted: Dec 21, 2007 - 11:41 PM
Veteran
Joined: Jul 01, 2007
Posts: 325
How about some pictures of the rear end with the engine swivel? I'm curious to see if they went with the same design as the prototype. Also, some low angle floor shots looking up would be cool.
LMAggie
Posted: Dec 22, 2007 - 02:36 AM
Veteran
Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 273
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
SnakeHandler wrote:
How about some pictures of the rear end with the engine swivel? I'm curious to see if they went with the same design as the prototype. Also, some low angle floor shots looking up would be cool.
I believe the STOVL propulsion system hasn't changed much. For a cool video (showing alot of good clips of stuff like BF1 and the engine) go here:
go to the link on the right hand side that says "F-35 2007 Year-End Review".
_________________ “Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
SnakeHandler
Posted: Dec 22, 2007 - 05:28 AM
Veteran
Joined: Jul 01, 2007
Posts: 325
Cool video. How much lighter did they make AF-1 than AA-1?
VarkVet
Posted: Dec 22, 2007 - 07:18 PM
Elite
Joined: Oct 30, 2006
Posts: 609
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
Another HUGE milestone for the program, the first stovl F-35 goes out to the flightline (on schedule I might add).[/quote]
Dear Hillary,
Can you please get us some BLK 60’s with all the toys until this platform is proven?
_________________ My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
LowObservable
Posted: Dec 22, 2007 - 07:27 PM
Active member
Joined: Jan 11, 2007
Posts: 121
Status: Offline
The 2006 cost figures are flyaway in 2002, not 2005 dollars. No R&D.
Average procurement for all JSFs is given by GAO as $86 million in then-year dollars. This is flyaway plus profits, overheads & spares, but not R&D. It applies to an average over the entire program including LRIPs, assuming target production rates are reached on schedule and maintained.
At a rough estimate, the average procurement cost for the A is $75 m (TY dollars again) and the B and C are around $110 million.
sferrin
Posted: Dec 23, 2007 - 03:05 AM
Elite
Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 915
Status: Offline
VarkVet wrote:
Another HUGE milestone for the program, the first stovl F-35 goes out to the flightline (on schedule I might add).
Dear Hillary,
Can you please get us some BLK 60’s with all the toys until this platform is proven?
Ha ha. Keep dreamin' If Billary gets in you'll be lucky if you get anything at all.