Forum: X-planes

Lockheed Blackbird Family



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Oct 08, 2010 - 04:45 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496

Also, the A-12 was slightly faster and could fly slightly higher than the SR-71 could thanks to it being lighter. As to the altitude, it could depend on the high altitude ambient temperature (no kidding). The temperature could vary by a lot depending on where the jet stream was, in very non-ideal conditions they'd struggle to maintain 60,000 feet.

Quote:
As TEG said, anyone who's "in the know" wouldn't be able to talk about it anyway.

You can say that over and over and over, he'll be back asking the same thing again in a month.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 22, 2013 - 12:25 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
mustang65
PostPosted: Oct 08, 2010 - 05:01 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Sep 03, 2009 - 04:00 AM
Posts: 99
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
Well I guess i want to apologize for getting to rapped up in this thread won't happen again promise. Seriously.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TC
PostPosted: Oct 09, 2010 - 08:56 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 4006

Status: Offline
Guysmiley wrote:
You can say that over and over and over, he'll be back asking the same thing again in a month.


It's possible, but not when I use the "magic button". Mwhuhahaha! Twisted Evil

_________________
"He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
mustang65
PostPosted: Jan 12, 2011 - 10:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Sep 03, 2009 - 04:00 AM
Posts: 99
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
Isn't the temperature constant above like 36000 feet? If the temperature is constant above a certain altitude then how can the temp change when an SR-71 is flying above that specific altitude were temp does not change? Apparently the unclassified material says that the SR-71 can fly mach 3.2 usually it goes a little faster or slower due to the temp but how can that be if the temp does not change above 36000 ft? Or it could go Mach 3.2 to Mach 3.3 when authorized by the commander even though it could probably routinely cruise at Mach 3.25 on standard day temps assuming the "unclassified" information is correct.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
madrat
PostPosted: Jan 13, 2011 - 06:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 986

Status: Offline
Air density.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
johnwill
PostPosted: Jun 11, 2011 - 03:29 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 24, 2007 - 09:06 PM
Posts: 1364
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Status: Offline
As I recall, there is a range of high altitudes where the temp does not change with altitude, but it does change day to day. So we have hot day, standard day, and cold day temp standards.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sprstdlyscottsmn
PostPosted: Jun 11, 2011 - 11:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1193

Status: Offline
also, its only constant temp up to like 60,000 ft, then it rises again

_________________
James,

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
mustachecachestache47
PostPosted: Jul 28, 2011 - 07:16 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jul 28, 2011 - 03:51 AM
Posts: 7
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Actually, the Blackbird is one of my favorites. it is fast, slick, and nice-looking, and its big. I seen one in real life, and they are GIANT. Sometimes, i think that it should come back as a bomber instead of a recon. it's big, and just add a bomb bay and take away the recon equipment, and you have a bomber.

_________________
Mustachecachestache47 {aviation rocks!!!}
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
rgeary15
PostPosted: Dec 25, 2012 - 04:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Mar 02, 2011 - 10:32 AM
Posts: 21

Status: Offline
I worked the SR-71 in the USAF 1979-1983
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
chris_win
PostPosted: Dec 26, 2012 - 01:00 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Dec 26, 2012 - 12:57 PM
Posts: 1

Status: Offline
beautiful plane
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic