| Author |
Message |
|
Guysmiley
|
Posted: Oct 08, 2010 - 04:45 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496
|
Also, the A-12 was slightly faster and could fly slightly higher than the SR-71 could thanks to it being lighter. As to the altitude, it could depend on the high altitude ambient temperature (no kidding). The temperature could vary by a lot depending on where the jet stream was, in very non-ideal conditions they'd struggle to maintain 60,000 feet.
Quote:
As TEG said, anyone who's "in the know" wouldn't be able to talk about it anyway.
You can say that over and over and over, he'll be back asking the same thing again in a month. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 22, 2013 - 12:25 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
mustang65
|
Posted: Oct 08, 2010 - 05:01 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Sep 03, 2009 - 04:00 AM
Posts: 99
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
|
| Well I guess i want to apologize for getting to rapped up in this thread won't happen again promise. Seriously. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TC
|
Posted: Oct 09, 2010 - 08:56 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 4006
Status: Offline
|
|
Guysmiley wrote:
You can say that over and over and over, he'll be back asking the same thing again in a month.
It's possible, but not when I use the "magic button". Mwhuhahaha!  |
_________________ "He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
 |
|
mustang65
|
Posted: Jan 12, 2011 - 10:34 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Sep 03, 2009 - 04:00 AM
Posts: 99
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
|
| Isn't the temperature constant above like 36000 feet? If the temperature is constant above a certain altitude then how can the temp change when an SR-71 is flying above that specific altitude were temp does not change? Apparently the unclassified material says that the SR-71 can fly mach 3.2 usually it goes a little faster or slower due to the temp but how can that be if the temp does not change above 36000 ft? Or it could go Mach 3.2 to Mach 3.3 when authorized by the commander even though it could probably routinely cruise at Mach 3.25 on standard day temps assuming the "unclassified" information is correct. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
madrat
|
Posted: Jan 13, 2011 - 06:10 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 986
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
johnwill
|
Posted: Jun 11, 2011 - 03:29 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Mar 24, 2007 - 09:06 PM
Posts: 1364
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Status: Offline
|
| As I recall, there is a range of high altitudes where the temp does not change with altitude, but it does change day to day. So we have hot day, standard day, and cold day temp standards. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
Posted: Jun 11, 2011 - 11:52 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1193
Status: Offline
|
| also, its only constant temp up to like 60,000 ft, then it rises again |
_________________ James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
mustachecachestache47
|
Posted: Jul 28, 2011 - 07:16 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jul 28, 2011 - 03:51 AM
Posts: 7
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
|
| Actually, the Blackbird is one of my favorites. it is fast, slick, and nice-looking, and its big. I seen one in real life, and they are GIANT. Sometimes, i think that it should come back as a bomber instead of a recon. it's big, and just add a bomb bay and take away the recon equipment, and you have a bomber. |
_________________ Mustachecachestache47 {aviation rocks!!!}
|
|
|
|
 |
|
rgeary15
|
Posted: Dec 25, 2012 - 04:48 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Mar 02, 2011 - 10:32 AM
Posts: 21
Status: Offline
|
| I worked the SR-71 in the USAF 1979-1983 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
chris_win
|
Posted: Dec 26, 2012 - 01:00 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Dec 26, 2012 - 12:57 PM
Posts: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|