Forum: F-22A Raptor

More F-22s on the way



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Dec 05, 2007 - 08:41 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 615

Status: Offline
Raptor_One wrote:
Corsair1963 wrote:
johnwill wrote:
Raptor claw, there was no intent to criticize your post. In fact, it is clear that you are very well grounded in all aspects of flight control, more than I certainly. I was just trying to reinforce your arguments, as I know you already knew what I was saying.

I'm retired now, so don't have direct contact with the F-35, but friends working on it tell me the control system is a real advance over anything else flying, and uses every control surface to give the pilot exactly what he asks for. Sounds great, but a can of worms for a Loads engineer trying to develop a set of design loads for the structure.



What are your friends general impression of the F-35 program? Of course without disclosing any classified material..............Are they excited? What do they think of the many critics out there? Do they think its a worthy successor to the F-16? Just looking for general answers...........


John said that he is retired, so I'm guessing his friends weren't giving him classified opinions on the F-35 program. Smile



I wasn't implying that they did or would give him classified information on the F-35. Yet, some information may still not be approriate for this discussion. Regardless, its up to him and let's leave it a that........ Cool
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Jul 06, 2008 - 2:24 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
SixerViper
PostPosted: Dec 07, 2007 - 07:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Jun 05, 2007
Posts: 323
Location: Richmond VA
Status: Offline
When maneuvering, any airplane rotates about its center of gravity, in all three axes. Turn rate is a function of true airspeed; the faster you're going, the slower the turn rate. G-loading is a function of bank angle, and without looking at my pilot charts from years ago, the angles/load factors presented here seem to be about right.

What makes an airplane turn is the horizontal vector of the lift created by the wing as it's banked. Lift ALWAYS is 90-deg to the wing. If you bank the wing, some of its lift is vectored horizontally (this is what actually pulls the airplane through the turn), and because of that, the nose will fall if AOA is not increased. When AOA is increased the G-load goes up and the airplane maintains altitude.

At 90 degrees bank, there is no vertical vector of the wing's lift. It's all horizontal and there is NO lift from the wing to hold the airplane in the air. Gravity would act against the downward wingtip. The airplane would rely on whatever lift it could get from the side of the fuselage (probably none) and gobs and gobs of thrust to maintain altitude. Next time you're at an airshow, notice that when the YAK or Extra 300 comes by on the "knife edge" at 90-deg bank it's quite nose up in YAW to vector the engine thrust against gravity. Same thing applies in a turn at 90-deg.

_________________
F-106A/B '69-'73
F-105D/F '73-'81
A-7D/K '81-'91
F-16C/D '91-'05
SCUBA bum '05-Present
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel