| Author |
Message |
|
gurthyjohnson
|
Posted: Sep 29, 2007 - 12:43 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Sep 29, 2007
Posts: 4
Status: Offline
|
| I am doing a bit of research for a modeling project for a MIANG F-16 with an OIF loadout. I have not found any pictures of F-16s with BOTH a targeting (LANTIRN) pod and a TARS pod. Am I correct in assuming that these pods cannot be used together due to electronics limitations (both needing to use the same in-cockpit controls, for example)? Can somebody confirm whether these pods could be or were ever simultaneously carried? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2008 - 1:27 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Roscoe
|
Posted: Sep 29, 2007 - 01:23 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jun 29, 2004
Posts: 988
Status: Offline
|
| There may be an aero restriction...the turbulence off the targeting pod may cause vibration on the camera pod (blurry pics) |
_________________ Roscoe
<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
|
|
|
|
 |
|
crazyal611
|
Posted: Sep 29, 2007 - 04:28 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 129
Status: Offline
|
| actually it is a weight issue |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Roscoe
|
Posted: Sep 29, 2007 - 09:35 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jun 29, 2004
Posts: 988
Status: Offline
|
| No kidding? I thought about that but givin the other loadouts I had seen I figured that couldn't be the case. Of course, a targeting pod is only truly useful if you have LGBs...with those and the TP, It makes snese now. |
_________________ Roscoe
<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
|
|
|
|
 |
|
gurthyjohnson
|
Posted: Oct 02, 2007 - 02:42 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Sep 28, 2007
Posts: 4
Status: Offline
|
| Thanks for the replies guys. I'm going to skip the TARS and load an ECM pod on the centerline instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
crazyal611
|
Posted: Oct 02, 2007 - 04:40 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 129
Status: Offline
|
| i wouldn't put a lantirn on it. In OIF only block 40/42's used lantirn. Guard block 30 units used Litening 2 pods. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ACMIguy
|
Posted: Oct 02, 2007 - 03:42 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 668
Status: Offline
|
http://www.f-16.net/news_article1167.html
"The combination of TARS and Litening allowed the group to be flexible in its mission. Not only could the F-16s help ground troops out of sticky situations, they could do reconnaissance at the same time, the officers said."
According to this they did fly both at the same time. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Henrik
|
Posted: Oct 02, 2007 - 05:27 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 12, 2005
Posts: 1581
Status: Offline
|
Only a few units have flown with the Litening/TARS combo - the ANG units from Texas (147th FW) , Arkansas (188th FW) and Minnesota (148th FW) flew with both pods at Balad during the summer of 2005.
Otherwise the configuration is mostly as shown on these photos.
Greetings,
Henrik. |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
15.57 KB |
| Viewed: |
1324 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
29.92 KB |
| Viewed: |
1324 Time(s) |

|
_________________ Vipers Vorever!!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49266321@N00/
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ViperDude
|
Posted: Oct 02, 2007 - 06:44 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Posts: 141
Status: Offline
|
TARS with a targeting pod is no longer an allowable configuration. Had nothing to do with weight.
Cheers,
ViperDude |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
gurthyjohnson
|
Posted: Oct 03, 2007 - 03:11 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Sep 28, 2007
Posts: 4
Status: Offline
|
|
crazyal611 wrote:
i wouldn't put a lantirn on it. In OIF only block 40/42's used lantirn. Guard block 30 units used Litening 2 pods.
Thanks for the heads-up on that! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sp4
|
Posted: Oct 03, 2007 - 01:38 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Oct 03, 2007
Posts: 12
|
| LANTIRN hasn't been used for OIF on any block since 2004, that I know of. Block 25-52 are all using either LITENING or Sniper now. If you're doing up an OIF model, you can leave STA 5 empty being that's how its flown. (With exception to the TARS units) |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SixerViper
|
Posted: Oct 03, 2007 - 04:42 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Jun 05, 2007
Posts: 354
Status: Offline
|
| Up until the time I retired in 2005, we were never authorized to fly TARS and Litening. My unit was the first F-16 recce unit in the USAF--we went from EO-1 to Richmond Recce to TARS. NEVER did we fly with targeting pods and recce pods. I'm not sure, but I think it had something to do with the landing weight in that configuration and the lightweight gear on the "pre-block" airplanes we had. If you look at the -1 or the -1-2, you'll see that of the approximately 50 million combinations of stores you can carry on a Viper, TARS and a targeting pod are not in there. |
_________________ F-106A/B '69-'73
F-105D/F '73-'81
A-7D/K '81-'91
F-16C/D '91-'05
SCUBA bum '05-Present
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ViperDude
|
Posted: Oct 03, 2007 - 08:33 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Posts: 141
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
NEVER did we fly with targeting pods and recce pods. I'm not sure, but I think it had something to do with the landing weight in that configuration and the lightweight gear on the "pre-block" airplanes we had. If you look at the -1 or the -1-2, you'll see that of the approximately 50 million combinations of stores you can carry on a Viper, TARS and a targeting pod are not in there.
TARS and a Litening pod were an authorized configuration and it was in the 1-2, it was taken out and it was not for weight issues, but I am not going to go into why they can't be flown...nuff said.
Cheers,
ViperDude |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|