Forum: F-16 Procedures

Should GE’s do the 1-minute motor?



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
VarkVet
PostPosted: Aug 26, 2007 - 12:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1442

Status: Offline
I think so … It’s nice to have the JFS bottles built back up, prior to ignition, just incase you need JFS start energy.

Common sense applies here though … if you’re on Alert start them like normal and kick a$$ like normal

Viper, Viper Twisted Evil

_________________
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 18, 2013 - 10:46 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
MechFromHell
PostPosted: Aug 26, 2007 - 02:57 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Sep 22, 2005 - 03:25 PM
Posts: 366

Status: Offline
I guess it all depends if you want the extra wear and tear on the JFS and JFS geartrain. Pro's and Con's either way really... Evil or Very Mad

_________________
Crew Chief
Mountain Home AFB 2000-2005~91-0370
Sheppard AFB 2005-2009~F-16 Instr
Kadena AB 2009-NOW~TA
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
der03301
PostPosted: Aug 26, 2007 - 03:25 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 17, 2007 - 07:22 AM
Posts: 46

Status: Offline
Why? That's why you have the "T" handle. Very Happy

-70JG-00-1 says to transfer to idle anywhere from 20% (90 degrees F or higher) - 32% (max motor/cold weather). Generally if your JFS is up and running, and your motoring the engine, chances are it's going to start unless having engine problems. If your troubleshooting a known problem you should already have a mule on the way so you don't have to pump it up every 10 seconds.

Motoring the engine causes increased wear on your JFS, and clutch servo. Would you rather have to pump it up every now and then, or change a clutch servo?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Aug 26, 2007 - 05:04 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2198
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
The 1-minute "Motor to cool" was a procedure designed for the F100-PW-220. Confused

If the engine were "hot" after being recently run, the top half of the compressor rotor would be hotter than the bottom half. (Heat rises, cool sinks) When this occurred, the compressor would warp or what the engineers called "bowed rotor".

If you motored to cool, the temperatures inside the rotor would normalize, and the bowed rotor would straighten out.

Without motoring the bowed rotor, the compressor blade-tips would dig into the abradable material around the blades, and increase the clearances of the compressor. After a couple times starting hot like this, compressor stalls could occur due to the blade tips "leaking" air through the increased gap. Sad

I don't think (guessing here) GE motors require the 1-minute "motor to cool" nor do the F100-PW-229s. They have a high-compressor with a different design that is more rigid and does not "bow" like the -220's. Very Happy

-229s don't require a oil scavenge at shut-down either, and the bucket requirement to catch the fuel dump has been eliminated. The dump fuel is redirected back into the engine's fuel system.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
cdhstang
PostPosted: Aug 26, 2007 - 06:13 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Oct 28, 2004 - 02:30 AM
Posts: 158

Status: Offline
I think 1 minute start are crap... They tear up the JFS and if we are going on with the 1 minute starts why must we always do start 2 even when the book says to do start 1 at a specific temp?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Mushmouth
PostPosted: Aug 26, 2007 - 08:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Jul 11, 2006 - 06:59 AM
Posts: 258

Status: Offline
No need to create more work for and engine that does not require it.

_________________
00-06 Shaw GE-129
06-07 & 11-12 ROK GE-100
07-11 Dyess B1B GE-102
11-12 Kunsan GE-100
12-'' JBMDL CF-6
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
rpgrynn
PostPosted: Sep 23, 2007 - 08:38 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 03, 2005 - 04:30 PM
Posts: 79

Status: Offline
cdhstang - Start 2 is preferred due to the increase toque available to the hydraulic start motor (2 bottles verses 1 bottle) and less drag from using the lube deprime valve. (I know it’s no fun pumping both bottles back up manually if the "Magic" doesn't work Smile)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
fireball
PostPosted: Sep 23, 2007 - 10:32 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 11, 2006 - 10:03 PM
Posts: 84

Status: Offline
I really don't like P&W engines, let's keep the band-aid fix for "rotor warp" to the crappy F-16 motor.

_________________
nellis 80-84 kun 84-85 bergstom85-87 kun 88-90 topgun90-95 depot96-present
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TimmayMan
PostPosted: Sep 24, 2007 - 10:44 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Apr 27, 2007 - 09:32 PM
Posts: 198

Status: Offline
IMHO I don't belive max motoring really hurts the JFS or associated components as much as it seems. On a prior deployment we used to max motor(up to 4 mins) for borescope insps which come up nightly or bi-nightly on deployments, especially if you have 25 hr borescope insps to deal with. But we never had any unusally start problems or issues. At least not more than normal.

_________________
Nellis 01-03
Aviano03-05
Cannon05-07
Osan 07-08
Luke 08-11
Charleston 11-present(C-17A)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
a1378
PostPosted: Oct 13, 2007 - 03:05 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jan 14, 2007 - 07:02 AM
Posts: 21
Location: Eielson AFB AK
Status: Offline
I dont see any reason why you would have to its not reqd in the 70jg. As soon as i get the sec lite off i'm going over the horn. I dont waana take the chance of screwing up anything on the jfs. The last thing i wanna do is fry a clutch servo or fuel control. As for motoring for a scope it really doesent do too much good anyways. the new video scopes we have are so sensitive your gonna have to wait the 4 hours after flight anyways before its cool enough to use it.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Oct 13, 2007 - 04:19 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2198
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
a1378 wrote:
As soon as i get the sec lite off i'm going over the horn. I dont waana take the chance of screwing up anything on the jfs. The last thing i wanna do is fry a clutch servo or fuel control. As for motoring for a scope it really doesent do too much good anyways. the new video scopes we have are so sensitive your gonna have to wait the 4 hours after flight anyways before its cool enough to use it.


Hope you're not running -220s you'll kill them... I know it's been found some bases were having stall issues with -220s and they found out people there (pilots/maintenance) weren't following tech-data. Scratch a few more core modules! Evil or Very Mad (Which makes it hard on the rest of us engine folks who have to wait months to get a core module in the first place!)

As for the starter, if it's running properly it won't hurt it to run up to it's limit. If you're frying clutch servos or fuel controls, something isn't right. T/S your JFS system. Rolling Eyes

Motoring an engine for maintenance cool-down is an excellent idea that works well depending on the outside air temperature. Air-conditioning unit hoses stuffed in the intake/exhaust with covers will cool it down quickly when deployed to HOT AORs. (And any maintenance folks sitting under the aircraft Wink )

The new video-scopes are bad for 'hot' deployments just for that reason... They do not deal with heat well. Even at the ramp temperature, those scopes can fail and if you don't have a fiber-scope backup you're $crewed. Doh
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Mushmouth
PostPosted: Oct 15, 2007 - 07:45 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Jul 11, 2006 - 06:59 AM
Posts: 258

Status: Offline
That_Engine_Guy wrote:
Air-conditioning unit hoses stuffed in the intake/exhaust with covers will cool it down quickly when deployed to HOT AORs. (And any maintenance folks sitting under the aircraft Wink


Never gonna for get them times stuffing a A/C hose in the rear just to do a flameholder or trying to cool the core off quiclky to hurry up and get the scope in cause you know the turbine is probally fXXked from all the heat and sand!! Doh

Mush

_________________
00-06 Shaw GE-129
06-07 & 11-12 ROK GE-100
07-11 Dyess B1B GE-102
11-12 Kunsan GE-100
12-'' JBMDL CF-6
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
oldjay
PostPosted: Oct 18, 2007 - 04:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 24, 2007 - 09:35 PM
Posts: 86

Status: Offline
Good points, about the "warping" issue, heard that from MANY a PW eng troop. Something else mentioned one inch above ^ engine dudes, settle that old debate- Ya gotta do exhaust work, (flamehoulder, whatever) where to shove the C-10 hose, front or back? You'd think back, but lotsa eng guys say, no, then you're just blowing everything the wrong way, screwing up the intake RAM, etc. Also, MAT insts used to say the whole pipe would actually cool quicker coming from the front, just give it a minute... Who be right? Or not? i dunno, ah just wave muh arms & pump gas (grunt) Shocked
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Oct 18, 2007 - 05:23 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2198
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
Cooling the engine with an A/C will not warp or damage anything. A good cold day (below 0) back in the US would have the same effect on cooling the engine.

As for blowing air "the wrong way" I've seen windy days pushing more air through and engine backwards, than any A/C hose could ever dream.

Best method is using a hose at both ends, place intake/exhaust covers, then hang a hose under the engine panels with safety wire so that the air blows into and around the bottom side of the engine bay. Very Happy

Sucks working on any engine hot, but sometimes it just has to be done to meet the next sortie... Cool Rolling Eyes
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic