F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: NKAWTG - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-8918-sid-617c0389474e3a63cd60caa52aba39b4.html
Printed on: 18 November 2008

Forum: Other Military Aircraft

NKAWTG



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
ATC
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2007 - 02:08 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Nov 17, 2005
Posts: 239

Status: Offline
I don't get it. What does it mean? Has something to do with tankers?

_________________
Lord bless Charlie Mops
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Nov 19, 2008 - 12:58 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





   
 
elp
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2007 - 01:47 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2862

Nobody_Kicks_Ass_Without_Tanker_Gas.

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
Elliboom
PostPosted: Aug 25, 2007 - 03:58 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Apr 05, 2006
Posts: 255

Status: Offline
Being a tanker toad myself, I personally hate this stupid slogan. All it is, is a rallying cry of those who finished at the bottom of their UPT classes. While it may be true that most current military operations could not happen without our support, it's still ok to know your place in life. And for the tanker clowns we are a support asset, not a combat asset.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
shiz302
PostPosted: Aug 25, 2007 - 07:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 25, 2003
Posts: 677
Location: Long Island NY
http://youtube.com/watch?v=kVmaLgK79sg

_________________
Ex 16 CC workin 'hawks.
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
TC
PostPosted: Aug 25, 2007 - 08:36 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 14, 2004
Posts: 2814

Status: Offline
Hell, don't worry Elliboom. All of the stud Boomers that I've known say it too. Of course, Loads and Boomers have this "odd couple" sort of relationship/rivalry anyway. They usually use NKAWTG just as a term to stick in our faces. We just tell them that they're jealous, because when they get out on the ramp with the 135s and the C-17s, we know what plane they really wish they were flying! Wink


http://www.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/ ... 0B-001.jpg

_________________
"If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 MPH, you're gonna see some serious $hit!"
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
INO
PostPosted: Aug 25, 2007 - 10:31 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Apr 07, 2006
Posts: 65

Status: Offline
Quote:
We just tell them that they're jealous, because when they get out on the ramp with the 135s and the C-17s, we know what plane they really wish they were flying!


One of these!



Family Boat Day 047.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  570.45 KB
 Viewed:  1175 Time(s)

Family Boat Day 047.jpg


 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Elliboom
PostPosted: Aug 26, 2007 - 11:38 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Apr 05, 2006
Posts: 255

Status: Offline
TC, I take it you are a loadsmasher in the C-17A. It's a great plane no doubt, but I seriously doubt that any boom secretly wishes that he was on the C-17 instead of the -135. It's a completely different job and if they wanted to be a load, then they should have been a load. If I was a load and not a boom then I would for sure try to get on the C-17. But for now I will take my 40+ year old jet and my job. The video posted was also great, I will be back at the Deed in about 8 weeks, and I almost forgot how much fun it will be.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TC
PostPosted: Aug 27, 2007 - 01:23 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 14, 2004
Posts: 2814

Status: Offline
Heh heh! Yeah, I know especially the Gucci Boys in the KC-10s want to stick with their jet. I do have a feeling though that we may have a combined AFSC here within the near future. It's been talked about 1A0s, 2s, and 6s merging. Dunno if it's true, or just rumors/propaganda. They will, however, have the same school house here within the next couple of months, so it will be interesting to see.

Oh yeah, and I'll take Barney over the Super Bug any day!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Aug 27, 2007 - 02:33 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2862

INO wrote:
Quote:
We just tell them that they're jealous, because when they get out on the ramp with the 135s and the C-17s, we know what plane they really wish they were flying!


One of these!



Good choice for this thread seeing as the Rhino is also a tanker Laughing Very Happy

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
Elliboom
PostPosted: Aug 27, 2007 - 04:33 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Apr 05, 2006
Posts: 255

Status: Offline
TC I also have heard the rumors of the AFSC's merging. I am not really sure what that will do other that eliminate a couple of numbers. It's not like a Boom Operator and a load have even remotely the same school or job, and neither one of us have any resemblence to a flight attendant. To me if you are going to merge AFSC's then that means that I should be able to act as a load and you should be able to act as a boom operator, which we both know will never happen. Looks to me like some O-6 in DC is bucking for a star and this is his way of getting it.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Aug 27, 2007 - 05:11 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2862

The USAF knows more about tanking than god. Why try and fix things that aren't broken?

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
TC
PostPosted: Aug 29, 2007 - 12:28 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 14, 2004
Posts: 2814

Status: Offline
With you word for word Elliboom! If I had to be a 1A0, that would mean about 5 more months of training on sims, and practicals up in the air, actually flying the boom. Foxtrot that! It would actually be easier to teach a Boom the Load's job than vice versa. Booms already have the fundamentals of Loading down. Alpha 2s know nothing about tanking. I agree Elp. If it ain't broken, don't fix it...but then again, the AF may break something just to fix it the way they want it to be fixed...only to rebreak it a couple of years down the road, and fix it back to the old way. Kind of like the situation that Maintenance is facing right now.

_________________
"If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 MPH, you're gonna see some serious $hit!"
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel