Forum: F-22A Raptor

F-22A / EF-2000 / Rafale versus Su-35BM



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Beazz
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2008 - 09:02 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Sep 15, 2007 - 08:19 PM
Posts: 460

Status: Offline
geogen wrote:
checksixx wrote:
bluewolf20 wrote:
What makes this worse is that both Chavez and Ahmadinejad sabre rattle every couple of weeks to force the oil price up. They both know they could not survive a conflict with the US but the underlying tactic is to damage the US by high oil prices and get rich in the process. With the US exporting $400 billion for oil each year it is working which will be a greater threat to the F-22 than any other aircraft.


The real crime is right here at home...we get VERY little oil from the Arabian area and little oil from Chavez.


Checksixx, of course: Saudi Arabia and Venuzeula are 2nd and 4th biggest import sources of oil. In relative terms today, it would be a catastrophic blow for US to lose that, just as it would be for them to lose it.

Hence the biggest issue for the US over the past 5 years at least: Energy policy/security.

As far as long-term US plans go, I would argue that the main crime domestically is that we still do not have a National Strategic plan to drastically reduce dependence on oil (whether domestically or foreign produced).

To simply say we can increase 2-3 million net bbl/day production over the next 10 yrs is not a national Energy policy. It's playing Russian roulette, sorry.

And only a mobilized national transformation will correct the 'crime.'


Why is the US not developeing these reserves now?? This is possibly TWICE the oil that SA has and is certainly economical to drill now. http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/nex ... 2.13s.html
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 27, 2012 - 4:43 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
checksixx
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2008 - 12:53 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 20, 2005 - 05:28 AM
Posts: 1179

Status: Offline
We have a HUGE oil reserve, they just won't release any of it.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
geogen
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2008 - 07:16 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2500
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Online!
Again, within a 10-12 yr mass investment in new domestic oil production, eventually peaking at about 2-3 million bbl/day net addition to domestic supply, results would be nominal if left as the main plank of a strategy. It would not be a national energy policy as is. It would have to be tied to a comprehensive domestic mission. And thus, sustaining the US's oil-dependent economy, regardless of a nominal decrease in % imports, we won't truly secure anything but sustained USgovt gas tax coffers.

Without getting into a full blown 'hypothetical should-be US energy policy' discussion, I'd just want to drive home the above basics. But I will conclude by noting externalized costs of sustaining the oil-economy as is, such as further contracting the consumer sector of economy, dollar weakness, increased health care costs/health afflictions and geo-political volatility/insecurity to name a few.

_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2012 F-16.net