| Author |
Message |
|
Tinito_16
|
Posted: Aug 07, 2007 - 02:12 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 248
Status: Offline
|
| Sensor integration is all the rage these days. So which has the best sensors, which allow the pilot better situational awareness? |
_________________ "Like the coldest winter chill, heaven beside you...hell within" Alice In Chains
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2008 - 12:48 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
Posted: Aug 07, 2007 - 12:39 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 372
Status: Offline
|
| F-22 as is vs F-35 envisioned? With the exception of radar the Lightning takes the cake. There are plans to upgrade the raptor sensor suite to that of the F-35 though |
_________________ James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
PhillyGuy
|
Posted: Aug 07, 2007 - 01:05 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006
Posts: 204
Status: Offline
|
| Thing is, theoretically the F-35's sensors and avionics should give it's pilot better SA seeing as how they are more integrated and overall more "advanced". However despite this the F-22 pilot will almost always enjoy better SA and have an advantage in combat due to the total package (i.e. entire aircraft) capabilities that the F-22 offers. |
_________________ "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Corsair1963
|
Posted: Aug 08, 2007 - 04:09 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 809
Status: Offline
|
|
PhillyGuy wrote:
Thing is, theoretically the F-35's sensors and avionics should give it's pilot better SA seeing as how they are more integrated and overall more "advanced". However despite this the F-22 pilot will almost always enjoy better SA and have an advantage in combat due to the total package (i.e. entire aircraft) capabilities that the F-22 offers.
In what "aspect" does the F-22 have better Situational Awareness over the F-35??? Especially, considering many of the F-35 features will be back fitted to the F-22..............  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
PhillyGuy
|
Posted: Aug 08, 2007 - 04:40 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006
Posts: 204
Status: Offline
|
| The F-22 has more LO technology integrated into the airframe, a more capable radar in terms of aerial combat, better operating capabilities ensuring the engagement takes place from an advantage and what is the F-35's ALR-94 equivalent? |
_________________ "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
checksixx
|
Posted: Aug 08, 2007 - 12:48 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1035
Status: Offline
|
|
Corsair1963 wrote:
Especially, considering many of the F-35 features will be back fitted to the F-22..............
Errr...no, thats not going to happen. Whoever told you that was slightly misinformed. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
snypa777
|
Posted: Aug 08, 2007 - 01:23 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 26, 2005
Posts: 1455
Status: Offline
|
I can see both fighters enjoying great SA. As Philliguy says, I can envision the F-22 having a better overall "picture" operating in the environment it was built for, Ie, A2A versus the environment the F-35 will do it`s work in-A2G.
The F-35 should be better suited and therefore have a better "picture" of the tactical picture on the ground. You have to remember that the F-35 main sensor is optimized for mud moving V the F-22`s radar which is the A2A king. I know other systems contribute to SA but it should be excellent for both fighters.
NB: Checksixx` I was also under the impression that the F-22 would receive advances made in the F-35 program, particularly concerning T/R module technology APG-81 to APG-77? I can`t recall where I read this...could be wildly wrong! |
_________________ "I may not agree with what you say....but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Aug 08, 2007 - 02:18 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2862
|
|
Corsair1963 wrote:
PhillyGuy wrote:
Thing is, theoretically the F-35's sensors and avionics should give it's pilot better SA seeing as how they are more integrated and overall more "advanced". However despite this the F-22 pilot will almost always enjoy better SA and have an advantage in combat due to the total package (i.e. entire aircraft) capabilities that the F-22 offers.
In what "aspect" does the F-22 have better Situational Awareness over the F-35???  Especially, considering many of the F-35 features will be back fitted to the F-22..............
Growth room. The 77 is a big aperture radar that has a longer A2A range than what one would expect from the limits of a small aperture 81. Extra empty space in the F-22 means more sensor upgrade options over the life of the program.
An EOTS like system can be funded for the F-22. There is space for it. It wasn't put in because of cost.
Side looking cheek arrays on the F-22, space for that too, not put in because of cost ( or cooling? or more blue screen of death worry? ).
F-22 has better battle space mobility meaning it can move that larger radar footprint around the battlefield faster for what ever use you want including more ISR data (ESM flavor anyway) per hour.
Ground moving target modes (someone correct me) are part of the F-22 block upgrade path. There are a lot more things that can be done with F-22 but the current funding climate is poor.
F-35, DAS and comes with a helmet and EOTS stock trim. Both F-22 and F-35 have good RWR/ESM stuff for targeting and ISR. The radar is the best (exportable) multimode radar you can get for the price. Growth room. Yeah it is open software which should mean excellent long term maintainability ( i.e. years from now you shouldn't have to do the space shuttle thing and go to a computer fair to look for 25 year old computer parts, open software hopefully means you can always use new computer hardware in future updates... less software updating for the purpose of running in a certain box.), I would expect everything is shoehorned in there and any attempt to beef it up may involve more cooling needs. Don't see where you would find the space to help that effort. What you see is what you get. Including, like the Super Hornet, and F-22, any insane crazy over-hype of electronic attack with the AESA has to consider that the current hardware and cooling may be near their limits just to do the original specified mission . The over-hyped portions of future electronic attack with the existing AESA hardware will have to be proven. And to a point a lot of that even if it is successful, you won't hear too much about it's real combat ability with electronic attack for obvious reasons. Most public info will be speculation by sales people and engineers.
F-35 is meant to be low price. Once Block III software is in place and running without crashing ( radar computers not the jet ) I think you will know more. On paper F-35 sensors aren't too bad and if everything works (tons of software) you get a pretty good total sensor package out of the box. Note part of situational awareness includes NCW ability to share info from off-board sensors so to be better informed about your battlespace. Currently, over the horizon coms are a red block in the plan meaning Team JSF hasn't made it public for what ever reason. Either that reason is OPSEC or it is the fact that they don't want to commit to putting in a system that has to be compatible with some of our older junk currently used in the NCW framework and have yet to decide what they want to put in the aircraft. |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|