| Author |
Message |
|
bdn12
|
Posted: Jul 20, 2007 - 05:56 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Posts: 38
Status: Offline
|
| Which of these would win in a race across the Atlantic? The fastest commercial aircraft or the fastest production bomber? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2008 - 12:22 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lightndattic
|
Posted: Jul 20, 2007 - 07:09 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Oct 06, 2005
Posts: 218
Status: Offline
|
| Concorde since it wouldn't have to slow down to refuel. The B-58 wouldn't be able to maintain it's dash speed long enough to cross the Atlantic. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
bdn12
|
Posted: Jul 21, 2007 - 12:04 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 38
Status: Offline
|
| Well, the B-58 did go from New York-Paris in 2 hours and 19 minutes, which is an average speed of over 1000 mph, so I think it would be close. I also think if it was a longer race, the B-58 would probably definitely win, because the Concorde can't refuel in midair while the Hustler can. Also, the SR-71 had to refuel to cross the Atlantic, but could still arrive a full hour before the Concorde could. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SixerViper
|
Posted: Jul 21, 2007 - 04:34 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Jun 05, 2007
Posts: 354
Status: Offline
|
Did you know that Convair (a division of General Dynamics back then) once boasted that they had the fastest bomber (B-58 ), fastest fighter (F-106) and fastest airliner (CV-880) in the world? I remember seeing a picture of all three flying in formation back when I was a kid. I remember flying from Lackland to Chanute on a CV-990 airliner.
[Edited by moderator to fix the B-58 and issue] |
_________________ F-106A/B '69-'73
F-105D/F '73-'81
A-7D/K '81-'91
F-16C/D '91-'05
SCUBA bum '05-Present
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SixerViper
|
Posted: Jul 21, 2007 - 04:34 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Jun 05, 2007
Posts: 354
Status: Offline
|
| Hmmmm--that was supposed to be B-58! |
_________________ F-106A/B '69-'73
F-105D/F '73-'81
A-7D/K '81-'91
F-16C/D '91-'05
SCUBA bum '05-Present
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jeff
|
Posted: Jul 22, 2007 - 12:12 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Apr 01, 2005
Posts: 121
Status: Offline
|
SixerViper,
I hope you don't mind, I went ahead and fixed that little issue in your post . Just remember (and your're by far not the first or only one to do it) that 8 + ) right together makes  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
Posted: Jul 25, 2007 - 02:48 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 372
Status: Offline
|
| Those are all planes that are just plain fast, but the Blackbird is stupid fast. |
_________________ James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
bdn12
|
Posted: Jul 25, 2007 - 03:48 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 38
Status: Offline
|
|
sprstdlyscottsmn wrote:
Those are all planes that are just plain fast, but the Blackbird is stupid fast.
That is so true. It's unbelievable that we made a plane that:
1. looks like something out of star wars
2. made from titanium bought from our enemy, the ussr
3. cruised for hours at speeds faster than a bullet
4. and of course, was designed over 45 years ago with a slide rule
It is definitely one of the greatest, if not the greatest, accomplishment in aviation history. Still by far the fastest of all time. (unless there is something out in the Nevada desert flying at Mach 6, which recent articles hint at.) |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
johnwill
|
Posted: Jul 25, 2007 - 02:42 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 24, 2007
Posts: 441
Status: Online!
|
|
sprstdlyscottsmn wrote:
4. and of course, was designed over 45 years ago with a slide rule
Well, not quite. There were computers then, I assure you. Large, very slow relative to today, no screens (paper output) etc. And before those computers, calculators were used extensively. They were not the hand held variety, but were electro-mechanical desk top units. They could do four-function math and a few could do square roots, although very very slowly. Slide rules weren't really used much, mostly for equations with trig functions. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SixerViper
|
Posted: Jul 31, 2007 - 09:31 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Jun 05, 2007
Posts: 354
Status: Offline
|
Jeff--thanks for the fix. I must have fat-fingered something.
sprstdlyscottsmn wrote:
Those are all planes that are just plain fast, but the Blackbird is stupid fast.
I read a pilot report in Avation Week & Space Technology once that led me to believe that flying the SR-71 at high mach numbers was a real bitch. There is a lot of engine management going on and the pilot is quite busy. This seems to be borne out by the online version of the 1SR-71A-1 T.O. that is available online at www.sr-71.org . I was blown away when I saw it available, but it looks like every dash one I've ever seen as far as layouts go.
Those engines have lots and lots of sucker doors, bleeder doors, spike management options, etc, etc, etc. |
_________________ F-106A/B '69-'73
F-105D/F '73-'81
A-7D/K '81-'91
F-16C/D '91-'05
SCUBA bum '05-Present
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sferrin
|
Posted: Aug 05, 2007 - 05:41 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 1089
Status: Offline
|
|
SixerViper wrote:
Did you know that Convair (a division of General Dynamics back then) once boasted that they had the fastest bomber (B-58 ), fastest fighter (F-106) and fastest airliner (CV-880) in the world? I remember seeing a picture of all three flying in formation back when I was a kid. I remember flying from Lackland to Chanute on a CV-990 airliner.
[Edited by moderator to fix the B-58 and issue]
I've seen that same picture  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
parrothead
|
Posted: Oct 17, 2007 - 08:42 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 10, 2004
Posts: 3098
Status: Offline
|
I'm just sad that both aircraft here are now only seen in museums.
Funny, at the Road Runners reunion I was talking with Jim Eastham who flew the YB-58 (Snoopy - the one with the long nose that was used for launch testing of the AIM-47 missiles), A-12, YF-12, and SR-71. I asked him how flying the Hustler compared to flying the Blackbirds. He said that after flying the Hustler, anything was a piece of cake ! |
_________________ No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|