F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: F-16 Stores vs F-35 Stores - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-8695-sid-7744cf7e486e9e957dd29eb519a9aa37.html
Printed on: 12 October 2008

Forum: F-16 Armament & Stores

F-16 Stores vs F-35 Stores



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Parkeran
PostPosted: Jul 20, 2007 - 08:59 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Posts: 144
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Can the F-16 store as many weapons as the F-35? I have been looking at a poster and the F-35 can store quite alot of things. It would be great if you let me know.

Cheers

Parkeran
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Oct 12, 2008 - 9:41 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
sprstdlyscottsmn
PostPosted: Jul 20, 2007 - 12:39 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 352

Status: Offline
to the best of my knowlege the F-16 is cleared for any air to ground weapon the weighs less than 3000 lbs. And IIRC the B-52 is cleared for everything bigger than a Maverick except the cargo plane dropped weps (ie daisy cutter, Moab)

_________________
James,

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Loomis
PostPosted: Jul 20, 2007 - 07:25 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 31, 2005
Posts: 69

Status: Offline
Are you asking if the F-16 can carry as many stores at one time as the F-35 or if the F-35 has integrated as many weapons as the F-16?

sprtsdlyscottsmn: "cleared" is ambiguous. Every store configuration on the F-16 must be certified as safe to carry by Seek Eagle (in a couple of FMS cases, LM Aero did the certification). This certification will include carriage and deployment envelopes that should not be exceeded. Not every A-G weapon configuration has received such a certification. In addition, weapons must be integrated on the F-16, which usually entails a change in the aircraft software. Again, not every A-G weapon has been integrated on the F-16. You are correct in the larger sense that there's a rule-of-thumb saying the F-16 can support any store less than 3000 lbs, but Have Lite is the only weapon I can think of off the top of my head that approaches that figure.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sprstdlyscottsmn
PostPosted: Jul 21, 2007 - 12:09 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 352

Status: Offline
I was refering to the certifications youre talking about. I know that certain weps can only be used in conjuction of certain other weps.

_________________
James,

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
F16wedge
PostPosted: Oct 24, 2007 - 02:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jul 14, 2006
Posts: 18

Status: Offline
Don't be fooled by pictures. The first operational (Air Force) F-35 will carry less than a hand full of air to ground ordnance types. Like everything, it costs money to integrate weapons onto an aircraft. As it matures, more will be added. A lot of ordnance will never be integrated (dumb bombs) because they wouldn't be tactically useful. The first Marine Corp F-35 will carry even less in order to be fielded sooner.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Oct 24, 2007 - 02:50 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2848

F16wedge wrote:
Don't be fooled by pictures. The first operational (Air Force) F-35 will carry less than a hand full of air to ground ordnance types. Like everything, it costs money to integrate weapons onto an aircraft. As it matures, more will be added. A lot of ordnance will never be integrated (dumb bombs) because they wouldn't be tactically useful. The first Marine Corp F-35 will carry even less in order to be fielded sooner.



Good reading all. Welcome to the forum F-16wedge.

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
end
PostPosted: Dec 19, 2007 - 12:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Sep 28, 2006
Posts: 59

Status: Offline
What I worried is how F-35 can load as big as this

if F-35 have to load big externally like this, where would stealth being?

_________________
I think therefor I am
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel