F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: X-44 MANTA project - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-8661-view-next-sid-cd3996400960081f73f15b5a0228a8fd.html
Printed on: 18 November 2008

Forum: F-22A Raptor

X-44 MANTA project



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
mil_hobbyist
PostPosted: Aug 11, 2007 - 02:18 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 50

Status: Offline
Anyone know what has been happening lately with the X-44 project? Has it been cancelled?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Nov 19, 2008 - 12:10 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





   
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Aug 16, 2007 - 03:04 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Posts: 765

Status: Offline
This is the only reference to the X-44 program on Jane's site. It appears just this once in an article concerning the FB-22.

Jane's wrote:
"An experimental tailless version of the F-22, known as the X-44 Manta (Multi-Axis No-Tail Aircraft) has been studied by NASA and the USAF Laboratory. Tailless technology could sharply reduce the bomber's side-on radar cross section (RCS)."


A brief mention in "Code One Magazine" 2nd Qtr 2001 - http://www.codeonemagazine.com/archives ... e_x44.html (Photo Below)

Code One Magazine wrote:
X-44
Mission: The X-44 is a proposed vehicle designed to fly without the aid of aerodynamic controls of any kind. All control inputs will be through the aircraft’s multi-axis vectorable exhaust nozzles.

Manufacturer: Lockheed Martin
Number Built: 0
Sponsor: USAF
Fastest Flight: NA
Highest Flight: NA
First Flight: NA
Last Flight: NA
Total Flights: NA
Length: unknown
Wingspan: unknown
Height: unknown
Gross Weight: unknown


From NASA's site - http://history.nasa.gov/monograph31.pdf - I've extracted the X-44's page (posted below) and it says...

NASA wrote:
"The X-44 designation is reportedly reserved for a possible full-scale USAF/NASA manned tailless flight control
demonstrator. The X-44 has been referred to as the MANTA, or Multi-Axis No-Tail Aircraft.

The plan is to convert an early prototype Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor with a large delta wing (similar to that proposed for the FB-22) and advanced thrust vectoring nozzles for flight control. Thrust vectoring—the ability to turn the jet exhaust—allows an aircraft to create forces with its engines similar to the forces created by aerodynamic surfaces such as flaps, rudders, and stabilators. The result would be a structurally simple, light airframe, with increased fuel volume and better “stealth” characteristics since there would be no movable aerodynamic control surfaces. An X-44 feasibility study is in progress, with a team including AFRL, NASA, Lockheed Martin, and Pratt & Whitney. The X-44 is unlikely to fly before 2007, although the F-22 program will retire the first and second flying prototypes long before then. The X-44 technology, combined with fluidic nozzles and supersonic-cruise aerodynamics, could lead to a generation of high-performance, very stealthy aircraft, with exceptionally high aerodynamic efficiency."


Note: reportedly reserved not assigned and the word possible. There are also no dates for program's progress or goals. Simply "unlelikely to fly before 2007" and we're 3/4 through the year.

With NASA's dwindling funds, the USAF/Lockheed/P&W may be the project's best hope, especially if the USAF/DOD is serious about the FB-22's development. With the ongoing war and lack of DOD funds, I doubt we'll see the FB-22 any time soon; if ever. Two Cents

On another note; one of the prototype aircraft mentioned above is currently at the USAF Museum being restored for display there. http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsh ... sp?id=8389

So I guess the answer would be either
1. No one seems to know much
2. Can't say
3. Won't say

Shrug
.



xplane_x44.jpg
 Description:
Lockheed "Code One" Magazine Photo
 Filesize:  41.62 KB
 Viewed:  5799 Time(s)

xplane_x44.jpg



x44.jpg
 Description:
Lochheed Photo
 Filesize:  20.43 KB
 Viewed:  5799 Time(s)

x44.jpg



x-44.pdf
 Description:
NASA's Fact Sheet for the X-44 Designation "Reservation"

Download
 Filename:  x-44.pdf
 Filesize:  37.58 KB
 Downloaded:  165 Time(s)

 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Master-of-Disaster
PostPosted: Aug 16, 2007 - 11:44 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 08, 2005
Posts: 69

Status: Offline
Kinda reminds me of the F-16XL project.

_________________
When flying, always make sure the pointy end goes forward.
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Aug 17, 2007 - 06:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Posts: 765

Status: Offline
Master-of-Disaster wrote:
Kinda reminds me of the F-16XL project.

Yes, the addition of a large delta wing gives several advantages. The F-16E tried to use some of these same traits.

Larger internal volume for additional fuel (resulting in range)
Larger wing area to increase max take off weight (needed for extra weight)
More hard-points for extra munitions

The tail-less design reduces drag/weight to gain even more over the delta alone. (There was also a tail-less version of an F-16 delta that never flew.)

The talk for the FB-22 also mentioned F135 engines from the F-35 program. The F135 would allow more power for the heavier aircraft, and possibly a reduced fuel burn at optimum cruise.

All in theory.... Two Cents
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel