Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2811
Location: Australia
LMAggie wrote:
Beazz wrote:
Come on, if American defense contractors were paid anymore, we would have to literally *contract* out our national defense as we could NOT afford it ourselves!! We're bout to go broke now as it buying all this * chump change* hardware!! I realize by an large it is the best in the world!! But to say they aint gettin paid GOOD money for it is ridiculous IMHO!!
LM practically designed the F-22 as a favor to a government.
It competed with the YF-23 and a down selected MacAir product.
If it wasn't for the F-35 win, LM would be left to survive on F-16 exports and might even sell that to Boeing. The fact that the country is broke has NOTHING to do with aviation defense contractors, but it has EVERYTHING to do with government politics.
Yes but it has always been that way. No "politics" = no shiny toys. Including political graft and political campaign contributions from said companies. The fact that the country is broke has a huge affect on what money is left to spend on defense. Look at the lack of USAF contracts over the years. E-10 dead. B-52SOJ dead, JCM, both those coming back in different forms. C-5 upgrades going bad. C-130 fleet needing more money for upgrades. What has the USAF purchased this year? Well some C-17s forced on it that aren't in a plan by political lobby. Fortunately a handful of JSF. Some C-130s. Reapers ( hello persistent strike in GWOT dirt operations) and a shiny new new generation 737-700 with winglets for the fatbastard congress to ride home in over the holidays for the VIP fleet. THAT is our recapitalization.
You think LM saw any part of the increased defense spending for the war? Hell no. In fact, they tightened the leash. Meanwhile, LM has to figure out a way to design a state-of-art fighter jet, and still buy the best quality hardware to protect the nation. So what happens? The engineering workforce is reduced and the remaining engineers must do double the work for the same amount of money to keep the blissfully ignorant taxpayer from complaining to their local congressmen. But it's ok, F-35 flybys sooth the soul .
It also flies by doing a lot of guess work in SDD that should have already been figured out in the previous engineering phase under a world business plan that had no options but to hold to the original production schedule to make an "affordable" fighter. Now that many of the Team JSF partners are not buying early, there is a cost problem. Sorry, it isn't all happy face. Yes there are a lot of Team JSF working hard and doing good work. However this program is so complex that a happy face press release isn't going to keep costs from going into a cruise climb. Orders are needed now. Lots of them. If that was to happen costs would come down. However, anytime things are extended out over years from the original plan, example USAF pulling 48 jets off of their order and then extending production out to 2040, costs of material and manpower are going to rise. F-35 may prove itself to be an excellent tactical aircraft and maybe the best of all time. I doubt we will see the "affordable" end of it show up any time before 2020.
Go boilermakers and yes watch the news this week.
...
_________________ - ELP -
Sponsor
Posted: Jul 24, 2008 - 10:53 PM
F-16.net Sponsor
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
dwightlooi
Posted: Dec 04, 2007 - 03:30 PM
Elite
Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Posts: 909
Status: Offline
elp wrote:
If it wasn't for the F-35 win, LM would be left to survive on F-16 exports and might even sell that to Boeing. The fact that the country is broke has NOTHING to do with aviation defense contractors, but it has EVERYTHING to do with government politics.
A few things...
(1) The deficit and national debt is a problem, but no the USA is not really broke. At least we are less broke than Japan, France, Germany, Italy and most industrialized nations. The US national debt is ~65% GDP, Japan is ~176% GDP, France is ~66% GDP, Germany is ~67% GDP, Italy is ~107%... etc.
(2) The US national debt has really less to do with defense or foreign wars than it has to do with the creeping socialism that has plagued this country. Defense is about 17% of the budget, social spending is about 61%, and the latter has grown by about from about 50% in the early nineties whereas defense is down from about 20%. In fact, all the red flag items which threatens to "break the bank" are social entitlement schemes such as social security, medicare, etc. This is not just a US problem, socialism is also rearing its ugly head in Europe as well which has even more egregious socialist burdens which, if not addressed, will ruin nations... and now moronic pinkies like Hillary are touting national healthcare! If that passes I am buying gold!
elp
Posted: Dec 04, 2007 - 06:56 PM
F-16.net Editor
Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2811
Location: Australia
You are forgeting operations Useless Dirt I & II that are sucking up 13-15 billion a month,... all on Chinese credit.
_________________ - ELP -
Smithsguy
Posted: Dec 04, 2007 - 07:17 PM
Regular User
Joined: Mar 08, 2005
Posts: 47
Status: Offline
On topic - return to flight perhaps today? Any news from FW?
LMAggie
Posted: Dec 04, 2007 - 09:22 PM
Veteran
Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 271
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
It almost happened today. No word yet on what spooked the flight test guys.
_________________ “Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
elp
Posted: Dec 07, 2007 - 05:43 PM
F-16.net Editor
Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2811
Location: Australia
Just as long as they are safe is all that counts. No rush.
Given the landing profile of the last flight, I wish they were out at Edwards now where your landing options are less stressful.
_________________ - ELP -
LMAggie
Posted: Dec 07, 2007 - 07:42 PM
Veteran
Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 271
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
...and she's up!
_________________ “Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 271
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
CATBird was supposed to return to flight also today, but I'm not sure if it did or not. I saw it do a high-speed taxi test, but I didn't watch after that.
_________________ “Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
Last edited by KeithTCU82 on Dec 08, 2007 - 12:41 AM; edited 1 time in total
Maxtype
Posted: Dec 07, 2007 - 11:58 PM
Regular User
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: 42
Location: Pueblo West CO
Status: Offline
Congrats,guys! That is a pretty sight.
elp
Posted: Dec 08, 2007 - 12:52 AM
F-16.net Editor
Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2811
Location: Australia
Classy move with getting the CATB up too. Congrats.
_________________ - ELP -
LMAggie
Posted: Dec 08, 2007 - 01:54 AM
Veteran
Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 271
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
elp wrote:
Classy move with getting the CATB up too. Congrats.
I was driving away from the AA:1 hangar after it took off, and not 1 minute later CATbird did it's taxi test. The CATbird team wanted to beat AA:1 to return to flight to show off and they got pretty close! Its going to be a good month for LM, I expect another press release in a few weeks .
_________________ “Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
VarkVet
Posted: Dec 09, 2007 - 06:08 AM
Elite
Joined: Oct 30, 2006
Posts: 609
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
Well done
_________________ My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline